Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,701–110,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:14
109,739
-28
11 Aug 2026, 15:13
109,767
-35
10 Aug 2026, 15:11
109,802
-38
9 Aug 2026, 18:25
109,840
-31
8 Aug 2026, 17:30
109,871
-56
7 Aug 2026, 14:20
109,927
-55
6 Aug 2026, 12:51
109,982
-12
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
109,994
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:03
109,994
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 109,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,100
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.905%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
47 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,152,450
Reactions total
10,426
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,050
Videos
≈2,040
Links
≈21,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 09s
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,194 reactions across 45 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,311
52.1%
👍
2,078
20.4%
🤣
1,092
10.7%
🙏
616
6.04%
😁
295
2.89%
🔥
242
2.37%
👌
109
1.07%
👏
86
0.844%
🤮
61
0.598%
🕊
57
0.559%
😢
49
0.481%
💯
47
0.461%
🥰
36
0.353%
🦄
19
0.186%
🎉
18
0.177%
🍾
17
0.167%
😘
12
0.118%
😡
12
0.118%
🤔
11
0.108%
🎄
10
0.098%
3 further kinds
16
0.157%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 46 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SBelkovskiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Правда ли, что из Великобритании будут выгонять русских и евреев? И при чём здесь большие деньги / европейские (драго)ценности.
Обсуждаем - в late night sit down show ДОБРОЙ. НОЧИ. МАЛЫШИ. Самом гуманистичном late night show периода Смены Эпох. Засыпаем безошибочно – ибо бессонница разума рождает чудовищ.
https://youtube.com/shorts/Zx4M-XkiEx4
И. Радикальный август 2026, когда Кремль усугубляет гонения на всё (ещ…
Верный признак по-настоящему Великого Вождя (ВВ) – личная скромность. Подчёркнутая и нарочитая. Кому принадлежат абсолютная власть над огромной страной + право ставить на уши весь мир – (из)лишние цацки / побрякушки не нужны. Чай (и кофе), не Л. И. Брежнев и даже не Дональд Трамп.
При В. В. Путине тысячи его соратников сделались Героями РФ (в большинстве случаев – непонятно, за какой героизм), генералами и фельдмарш…
Кто-из нас родился при тоталитаризме. И там-тогда понятия «независимая журналистика» не было и быть не могло.
Это всё возникло - имеется в виду, на русской почве - в конце 1980х. Чтобы вскоре выяснилось, что журналисты не только будут свободно фиксировать жизнь и делать из неё свои частные выводы. Нет, они собираются устанавливать моральные стандарты и даже профессиональные – для других специальностей – нормы.
Пото…
Рубрика «Не проходим мимо».
Город: Брянск
Дата: 12.08.2026
Статус: поиск дома
Срочно нужен дом для крошечного котёнка!
Этот малыш всего 1 месяц от роду — настоящий комочек нежности и тепла. К сожалению, его выбросили, и теперь он отчаянно нуждается в заботе и любви. Обработан от блох, чистый. Очень нежный, любит лежать на коленях, на руках.
Давайте вместе подарим котёнку шанс на счастливую жизнь!
Телефон: 89637826…
Вниманию В. В. Путина и Ко. И вообще - всем постам.
Бывает и правильный Колобок – Колобок здорового человека.
Вот здесь – см. видео – полно и точно, причём сжато и ёмко описан жизнетворческий путь нынешнего РФ-правителя. Бабушка и дедушка – семья Б. Н. Ельцина, приведшая его к власти. Ну и конечно, отдельных аплодисментов заслуживает эффектный катастрофический финал, источник особой тревоги / страхов г-на Путина.
…
В чём разгадка нынешней странной истории доктора Джекилла и мистера Хайда с партией «Яблоко»? И при чём здесь Агата Кристи.
Рассудим - в late night sit down show ДОБРОЙ. НОЧИ. МАЛЫШИ. Самом демократичном late night show периода Смены Эпох. Засыпаем под Ф. М. Достоевского – ибо бессонница разума рождает чудовищ.
https://youtube.com/shorts/kYcjp8zfQTo
И. Томлёный август 2026, когда Кремль продолжает себе закручивать…
Кто виноват? – Евреи виноваты (с). Антисемитские + антиизраильские настроения объединяют разные крылья американской политики, ещё недавно казавшиеся несовместимыми / непримиримыми.
10 августа 2026 всеизвестный Такер Карлсон и сын 46го президента США Хантер Байден провели подробную беседу в эфире The Tucker Carlson Show. Сам факт такого эфира ещё годик назад казался бы труднопредставимым – а тут вот. В интервью обсуж…
Рубрика «Не проходим мимо».
Город: Москва и МО
Дата: 11.08.2026
Статус: поиск дома
Молоденькую кошечку спасли с улицы. Откормили, стерилизовали, от паразитов обработали. К лотку приучили. Очень ласковая и добрая. Находится на передержке. Хорошо ладит с собаками. Очень ищем заботливые ручки. Передержка, это не дом. Доставим
Телефон: 89031283533 Елена
18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЁН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И …
Скоро – выборы ректора легендарного ГИТИСа (Российской академии театрального искусства – РАТИ). Оптимальный кандидат – разумеется, К. Ю. Богомолов, художественный руководитель московского Театра на Малой Бронной.
Недавно он был уже (почти) назначен руководителем Школы-студии МХАТ. Но злобные интриганы, в театральном мире и вокруг, заблокировали его кандидатуру. Главный формальный аргумент был: г-н Богомолов не училс…
Известно, что «Колобок» - любимый нарратив В. В. Путина. Ассоциирует ли себя РФ-правитель с Колобком? Какова глубинная (взаимо)связь между «Колобком» и «Бандитским Петербургом»? Можно ли сказать, что ключевой страх г-на Путина – закончить, как Колобок; то есть: стать жертвой притворной любви врага (она же - «дух Анкориджа»)? Не этим ли продиктованы гиперамбиции авторов нового РФного трэш-триллера «Последний богатырь.…
Кремль пошёл против РПЦ МП? И при чём здесь братья Карамазовы.
(Об)говорим - в late night sit down show ДОБРОЙ. НОЧИ. МАЛЫШИ. Самом (при)открывательном late night show периода Смены Эпох. Засыпаем на свободе – ибо бессонница разума рождает чудовищ.
https://youtube.com/shorts/ribbA1UNt3E
И. Репрессивный август 2026, когда Кремль даже «Яблоко» отстранил от т. наз выборов, - верное время (при)обрести наши, эксклюзивн…
Воспетый известным советско-еврейским анекдотом принцип «Бьют не по паспорту, а по морде физическому лицу» - действует далеко не совсем, не со всеми и не всегда.
По мере десакрализации и девальвации самого института просвещенческого Государства казалось, что паспорт той или иной страны уже не говорит о человеке как всесторонне развитой личности ничего особо существенного. Паспорт – типа свидетельство о принадлежност…
👍85❤47😁5🤮4👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @SBelkovskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@SBelkovskiy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сегодня, в наш Всемирный день, приводим в действие важный опрос. Надо ли приостановить на 100 дней работу ЭТК БЕЛКОВСКИЙ? Многие за, но вот коты, в основном, - против. Опрос продлится неделю, и по результату его - примется верное решение. Спасибейше.
Приостановить8%
Не приостанавливать72%
Отложить решение11%
Не имеет никакого значения12%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 17,391 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Екатерина Шульман @eschulmann · 306,735 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Тут картины показываем @artgallery · 196,566 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
aavst2022 @aavst2022 · 177,308 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Город Глуповъ @gorodglupov · 158,386 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Генерал СВР @generalsvr · 281,028 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Михаил Ходорковский @khodorkovski · 155,666 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Arestovich / Official @O_Arestovich_official · 246,734 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
НЕВЗОРОВ @nevzorovtv · 1,008,244 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
Усы Пескова @Sandymustache · 212,977 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Дабл Ять @otsuka_bld · 161,752 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Соловьиный Помёт @slvn_pomet · 286,594 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Сталингулаг @stalin_gulag · 302,871 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Можем объяснить @mozhemobyasnit · 459,923 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Новая газета @novaya_pishet · 200,342 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
Блумберг @bloomeconomy · 370,112 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
BBC News | Русская служба @bbcrussian · 388,515 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Ватное болото @vatnoeboloto · 386,025 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Vladimir Pastukhov @v_pastukhov · 153,971 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Накипело. Майкл Наки @Nackepelo · 212,790 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Настоящее Время @currenttime · 146,481 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Давыдов.Индекс @davydovin · 1,907,697 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер @voinasordoy · 202,747 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белковский” (@SBelkovskiy), 109,739 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SBelkovskiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.