Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Житель последних времен

Channel

Житель последних времен

@DmitTar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,229subscribers

+510 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001582578792
TypeChannel
Username@DmitTar
DescriptionД. Т.
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DmitTar

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7197,3597,0396 August 2026 — 6,719 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,719 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,726 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,951 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,005 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,122 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,111 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,257 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,240 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,219 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,224 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,359 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,341 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,316 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,296 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,282 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,287 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,299 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,282 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,275 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,250 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,246 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,229 subscribers7,2296 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net +510. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,623–7,455 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:157,229-17
5 Nov 2026, 02:267,246-4
2 Nov 2026, 00:077,250-25
29 Oct 2026, 23:587,275-7
27 Oct 2026, 01:487,282-17
23 Oct 2026, 22:547,299+12
20 Oct 2026, 17:487,287+5
17 Oct 2026, 21:557,282-14
14 Oct 2026, 23:087,296-20
11 Oct 2026, 19:597,316-25
5 Oct 2026, 10:017,341-18
27 Sept 2026, 03:187,359+135
17 Sept 2026, 21:597,224+5
13 Sept 2026, 13:417,219-21
9 Sept 2026, 19:367,240-17
4 Sept 2026, 21:377,257+146
31 Aug 2026, 21:347,111-11
25 Aug 2026, 18:437,122+117
22 Aug 2026, 20:027,005+33
19 Aug 2026, 14:436,972first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 7,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,820
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held64 (12 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total80,250
Reactions total2,119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
4
Links
443

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7,748 reactions across 64 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,67634.5%
👍1,66521.5%
👎93512.1%
😁5396.96%
❤5096.57%
🤔4285.52%
🔥2823.64%
😢2132.75%
👏1742.25%
😐951.23%
🤨460.594%
🤬360.465%
🤯320.413%
❤‍🔥230.297%
🙏230.297%
😱220.284%
👌170.219%
🕊110.142%
🤩80.103%
⚡70.09%
3 further kinds70.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,748 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 64 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DmitTar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (52.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,430 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вообще есть две позиции: первая - я как все, стыдно быть не таким как все и вторая - стыдно быть таким как все. У второй есть разные аспекты и нюансы, но, те, кто ее занимают вряд ли станут адептами любого вида тоталитаризма.

👍53💯21👏10❤2🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,480 views102 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Штраф за дискредитацию традиционных ценностей...А можно себе представить, что Иисус вводит денежный штраф за дискредитацию заповеди о Любви? Значит, речь идёт о советских же ценностях, слегка перелицованных.

💯73👍13😁10❤2❤‍🔥2👏1🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,670 views98 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Наблюдая за ситуацией пресса в отношении нефоров, прежде всего задумаемся над происхождением самого этого слова. Это же результат длящегося вербального диктата совка. Это в его финале возник термин "неформальные молодежные объединения" для маркировки нас - панков, хиппи, металлистов, для стигматизации и отделения от правильных "формальных объединений" - пионеров и комсомольцев. То есть, современные зумеры даже и знат…

👍57💯12🔥8😁7👎6🤔4😢2❤1

8 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,260 views173 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Кстати, в чем проблема с педерастами? Вы когда-нибудь слышали вообще про счастливого педераста? Не, я например, никогда. И не могут они быть счастливы. Вы скажете, мол, счастье это субъективно, и вообще, кто мол, счастлив? Да, ни хрена подобного. Счастье - это "Gaudium cum pace» - мир и радость. То есть, это состояние такой внутренней гармонии, которое невозможно без любви к Богу и людям. Но проблема педерастов в то…

💯76👎36😐19🤔12❤8😁8🔥5🤨5

8 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,230 views91 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Пока кто-то бредит про проникнутость нашего народонаселения традиционными ценностями, Собчак берет интервью у откровенных пидоров каких-то, которые оказывается имеют немерянные объемы просмотров. Ну, чо, когда вы боретесь с педерастией симулякрами, по другому и быть не может. А население в массе аморально вполне, в том смысле, что и не знает, что такое хорошо и что такое плохо. Но, когда ему это собираются объяснять …

💯52😁18🔥9👎5❤3👍2🤬1🥰1

8 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,260 views88 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Три мушкетёра" самый экранизируемый роман в истории кинематографа. Но в чем на самом деле суть противостояния мушкетёров и Ришелье. Ведь это столкновение либерального сознания и государственнического. Поясню: мушкетёры и другие аристократы той поры отстаивали свое право на дуэль, утверждая тем самым, максиму классического либерализма (не путать с левацкой подделкой): "моя жизнь принадлежит мне". А Ришелье настаивал…

👏45🤔18👍9😁8❤4👎2💯1🥰1

7 Nov 2026, 20:45 UTC≈2,620 views119 reactionsread 11 November 2026

7 ноября ежегодно важно повторять: Непримиримость. Большевизм абсолютное зло. Увидел сегодня у одного из лидеров либеральной журналистики (иноагента) вопрос: кем был Робеспьер - Идеалистом, мечтавшим о справедливости, или архитектором революционного террора? Постановка вопроса вполне идиотская - идеалист, мечтающий о справедливости обязательно придет к террору. Это неизбежно - во имя торжества "добра" здесь и сейчас…

❤46👍26💯23👎13😁5👏4🕊1🥰1

7 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,580 views113 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ну всему есть предел....И обозвать Колчака "коллаборационистом" - это хуже чем беспредел, это безграмотность. Коллаборационист - это тот, кто сотрудничает с врагами страны своего гражданства. Колчак был подданным Российской империи и гражданином Российской республики. И для первой, и для второй Великобритания была страной-союзницей. А врагом она была для национал-предателей большевиков. Поэтому будучи убежденным стор…

💯74👍17👎10❤7😁4😱1

4 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC≈3,900 views67 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ситуация с Трампом может в итоге оказаться сходной с казусом Гитлера. Без харизмы, уверенности в собственном мессианстве и популизма лидера определенная группировка никак не может прийти к власти, однако ровно те же его качества, которые в начале приводят их к победе, в финале оборачиваются для них катастрофой.

👍29💯15🤔10😁6👎4❤2😢1

2 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC≈4,250 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Да, тут очень ёмко и точно описано рождение и становление воукизма. Но вот, что нужно иметь ввиду. Французские философы-деконструкторы кто угодно, но не идиоты. А вот проповедники воукизма, использующие их инструментарий именно идиоты. Ведь они совершенно необоснованно и произвольно приняли как не деконструируемую истину, что свобода - это добро, а власть, понятая, как угнетение - зло. Но эта установка, разумеется са…

👍24😁11👎5❤2🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈3,880 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Не только на примере США, но целого ряда других стран (последний пример Польша) мы видим, что либеральные демократии уже вполне очевидно не являются справедливыми политическими системами, функционирующими в соответствии с волей абсолютного большинства. Они стали системами подавления одной половины общества другой, причем, часто при очень небольшом численном преимуществе. Самый яркий пример - это, конечно противостоя…

❤23💯19👎14👍4😢4😁3🤔2

1 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC≈3,430 views143 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В основе противостояния правое-левое помимо политического и экономического и превыше их - эстетическое измерение. Правое - это всегда мечта о прекрасном, утверждение того, что красота - это объективное понятие. Левое всегда - это не просто защита уродства, но утверждение, что объективной красоты и не существует.

👍67👎39😐10❤5🔥5😁5👏4🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @DmitTar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTCAnonymous Poll1,300 voters approx.

Кстати, а давайте выясним, кто для вас Сталин?

  1. Эффективный менеджер16%
  2. Отец-родной6%
  3. Реинкарнация ассирийского царя Ашшурнацирапала26%
  4. Просто преступник60%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тени Руси
@tenirusi · 24,847
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
МИРОНОВ ДЕ-ФАКТО
@mironov_de_facto · 18,844
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,403
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Интуиция подскажет
@intuition2036 · 37,583
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,922
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Житель последних времен” (@DmitTar), 7,229 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DmitTar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.