Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хазин

Channel

Хазин

@khazinml

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

242,575subscribers

-3,554 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332178867
TypeChannel
Username@khazinml
DescriptionКомментарии Михаила Хазина Запись на консультацию: Елизавета @economic_khazin Регистрация: https://t.me/khazinml/9757 https://max.ru/khazinml https://khazin.ru https://youtube.com/@khazinml https://rutube.ru/u/khazinml https://vkvideo.ru/@khazinml
Created20 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/khazinml

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pyatnica_vecher/13774 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC@khazinml/13469 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC1.002 minutes
@khazinml/13469 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC@oper_goblin/395904 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC1.007 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MIrvMomente42 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41–1)
@clubpravda26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (24–2)
@pyatnica_vecher7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@pyatnica_vecher (7–0)
@oper_goblin12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutesthis entry (9–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 373 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

242,252246,139244,195.5242,5755 August 202612 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -3,554. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241,669–246,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 01:26242,575-56
10 Nov 2026, 00:20242,631+64
8 Nov 2026, 14:06242,567+31
7 Nov 2026, 09:37242,536+138
6 Nov 2026, 12:19242,398+86
5 Nov 2026, 10:57242,312+24
4 Nov 2026, 07:28242,288+32
3 Nov 2026, 03:49242,256+4
2 Nov 2026, 05:08242,252-15
1 Nov 2026, 07:37242,267-64
31 Oct 2026, 07:29242,331-40
30 Oct 2026, 05:06242,371-46
29 Oct 2026, 03:21242,417-31
28 Oct 2026, 01:57242,448-30
27 Oct 2026, 01:17242,478-36
26 Oct 2026, 01:47242,514-87
25 Oct 2026, 03:08242,601-79
23 Oct 2026, 23:35242,680-40
23 Oct 2026, 02:49242,720-38
21 Oct 2026, 22:50242,758first reading

Engagement

663 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 242,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
36,700
260 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
260
of 663 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held663 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total9,538,100
Reactions total123,909
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,000
Videos
≈1,100
Links
≈8,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 56s
Average length
1m 55s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

329,016 reactions across 642 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍131,17839.9%
🤔45,84913.9%
🤣43,88713.3%
🔥39,83012.1%
❤34,66610.5%
🤯12,6393.84%
😢7,4542.27%
👏5,7681.75%
🙏3,3391.01%
🤝2,3430.712%
😎1,4440.439%
🫡4780.145%
🥰1410.043%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 653 of the 663 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337,081 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 663 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
205
across the posts below
Posts paid on
105
of 653 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @khazinml. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 663 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 58 of 260 posts held from the last 30 days (22.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 19:30 UTC≈15,400 views341 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Германия развивается: https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/82167 .

🔥196👍82🤣36🤯14👏9❤2🥰1😢1

12 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈22,900 views241 reactionsread 13 November 2026

https://t.me/KUP2019/204?single Леонид Иванович Холод рассказывает про сельское хозяйство

👍197❤29🤣7🔥3😢3🤯2

12 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC≈24,400 views211 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Финансовые рынки США пока держатся, а вот это: https://t.me/markettwits/393178 ... А вот это — очень неприятно.

🤔153🔥31❤16🤣5👏3😢3

12 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈32,600 views159 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Большое моё рассуждение вокруг Уиткоффа и Кушнера: https://t.me/hazinOpen/3731 .

🤔99🤣23👍18❤13😢4🔥2

12 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC≈25,500 views373 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Хуанга добили: https://t.me/bbbreaking/242153 . Теперь вопрос: было ли это связано по времени с попыткой обрушить американские рынки на прошлой неделе?

🤔275👍52❤14🤝12🤣9😢5🔥4🤯2

12 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC≈28,600 views503 reactionsread 13 November 2026

7. Отступление: исторические корни украинской ситуации Я считаю, что нынешние нравы на Украине не новость, так было всегда, и ссылаюсь на собственные поездки и рассказы людей, живших там в конце 1950-х — начале 1960-х. Города на Украине были русско-польско-еврейскими, а при Хрущёве на новые фабрики стали массово завозить сельскую молодёжь, что, по этим рассказам, изменило городскую среду. Владимир Соловьев эту версию…

👍366❤63🔥34😎17🤔11🤣7🤯4😢1

12 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC≈27,200 views349 reactionsread 13 November 2026

6. Атаманщина на Украине приведёт к распродаже компромата Компромат в Киеве важен и европейцам, и американцам, чтобы он не всплыл, а Трамп в своё время просил его и не получил. Владимир Соловьев допускает, что теперь им могут торгануть с Трампом в обмен на какие-то гарантии. Моя версия другая: у западников есть иллюзия, что Украина — нормальное государство со странными руководителями и что одного террориста можно зам…

👍253❤44🔥27🤯11🤔6🤝4🤣3😢1

12 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC≈25,500 views329 reactionsread 13 November 2026

5. Война нужна на бумаге — как предлог для диктатуры Европейские элиты очень хотят устроить с нами войну, но, мне кажется, устроить её они могут только на бумаге, то есть в интернете. Цель у них не воевать и тем более не выиграть, а любой ценой остаться у власти. Для этого Западную Европу надо превратить в Украину, с пыточным подвалом в каждом дворе, а для этого нужен «ужас-ужас» в виде российской угрозы, который они…

👍214🔥40❤30🤔14🤯12🤣11🤝5😢3

12 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC≈24,700 views321 reactionsread 13 November 2026

4. Главная пакость американцев: Европу лишили механизма стерилизации Владимир Соловьев спрашивает, почему европейцам просто не нарисовать денег сколько надо. Отвечаю: чтобы печатать деньги, нужен инструмент стерилизации избыточной ликвидности, иначе начинается высокая инфляция. Своего суверенного механизма у европейцев никогда не было, они выбрасывали капиталы на американские финансовые рынки, а для этого нужны долла…

👍241❤30🔥25🤔18🤣3🤝2🤯1😢1

12 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC≈24,200 views307 reactionsread 13 November 2026

3. Восстание контрэлит на фоне импотенции власти То, что происходит в Западной Европе, описано во всех учебниках политологии: это классическое восстание контрэлит при полной импотенции действующей власти. Импотент, как я объяснял школьникам, — это существо, вся жизнедеятельность которого выражается глаголами несовершенного вида: копать и строить может, а результата не бывает никогда. Трампа можно любить или ругать, н…

👍227❤38🔥31🤯5🤔4🤣1😢1

12 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC≈24,800 views336 reactionsread 13 November 2026

2. Два главных страха: вложенные деньги и компромат в Киеве Американцы гоняют европейцев в хвост и в гриву: денег больше не дают, требуют возврата, а за кулисами говорят, что с этим безобразием пора заканчивать. У западноевропейских политиков натуральная истерика, и боятся они даже не столько потери Украины. Первое, что их пугает: денег вложено немерено, и за них надо отвечать. Второе: все понимают, что в Киеве лежит…

👍247🔥42❤30🤔13🤣2🤯1😢1

12 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC≈26,100 views331 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Тезисы беседы с Соловьёвым от 11 декабря 2026 года в текстовом варианте. 1. Европейская элита мечтает только об одном — остаться Не надо путать Европу со старыми камнями и соборами и современную политическую элиту Европы: фон дер Ляйен, Мерца, Макрона и прочих. У них у всех одна мечта — остаться у власти. Поэтому они хоть тушкой, хоть чучелом рвались в Абу-Даби: подозревают, что американцы с русскими собираются дели…

👍238❤38🔥31🤔13😎5🤣2🤯2😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 663 posts we hold for @khazinml. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@khazinml edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTCAnonymous Poll4,940 voters approx.

Не следует ли вернуться к прежней политике и сократить число материалов в телеграм каналах?

  1. Да, не успеваю всё читать13%
  2. Нет, нужно оставить всё, как последние дни57%
  3. Надо добавить!33%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTCFinal Results5,820 voters approx.

Как закончатся промежуточные выборы в США

  1. Республиканцы оставят за собой и Палату представителей, и Сенат15%
  2. Демократы возьмут Палату представителей, но "на тоненькую", Сенат останется у республиканцев35%
  3. Демократы серьёзно выиграют Палату представителей, но Сенат взять не сумеют13%
  4. Демократы серьёзно выиграют Палату представителей и возьмут Сенат8%
  5. Победа демократов в обеих палатах будет разгромной5%
  6. Неожиданный результат, демократы возьмут обе палаты, но обе — еле-еле.17%
  7. Выборы отменят 🤫🫣🤯13%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,870 voters approx.

Опрос для участников вебинара, который состоялся в этот четверг. Меня интересует ваше мнение.

  1. Мне вебинар понравился, получил новую информацию и идеи21%
  2. Вебинар для меня полезен и часть информации из него я буду использовать17%
  3. Вебинар нормальный, но для меня много общей информации. Хочется более конкретных тем37%
  4. Вебинар не понравился, нужной информации я не получил25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 663 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Мир в Моменте
@MIrvMomente · 73,048
75 posts
Клуб Русской Правды🇷🇺
@clubpravda · 86,947
43 posts
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение
@KamilAskerkhanov · 27,872
18 posts
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 205,226
6 posts
FYTW
@fuckyouthatswhy · 24,055
3 posts
Марк Р.
@MRR_O8 · 4
2 posts
АВРОРА ДЛЯ БИЗНЕСА
@aurora_for_business · 116
2 posts
Группа "Финансовая конспирология"
@finconsp · 14,166
2 posts
марковонлайн
@markovonline · 3
2 posts
BEERS
@BEERSTABLE · 20
1 post
Gladkov
@DA_Gladkov · 4
1 post
Глазьев экономика
@Gluazev · 784
1 post
КонстантинСК
@KarpovK · 17
1 post
Первый Харьковский
@Kharkov_Perviy · 51,960
1 post
Гильманов Павел Продажи
@ProdajiKakObmen · 240
1 post
Risk.today
@RiskToday · 17
1 post
САЙТ ВАЛЕРИЯ CУРИКОВА
@VVSURIKOV · 12
1 post
Белый дым
@WeiserRauch · 27
1 post
Новый Век
@Wek_ru · 18,498
1 post
AiM
@aim_marko · 8,558
1 post
Альдиев PRO
@aldiyev · 90
1 post
АрхиПрофессионалы
@arhi_pro_ru · 3,237
1 post
Басурин о главном
@basurin_e · 91,055
1 post
Chronicles of Covidla
@covidlarus · 8
1 post
Crypto santiment
@crypto_santiment · 4
1 post
CryptoNewsWorld Z - Крипторынок, инвестиции, финтех - особый взгляд. Авторский канал.
@cryptonewsworld · 228
1 post
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,603
1 post
МИР ТВ
@fEOmOtKSaMQwZGEx · 7
1 post
Сливки(инфо)
@informzimes · 12
1 post
Креативные потенции
@kreatiffpotc · 86
1 post
Крейсер
@kresik001 · 9,508
1 post
Mr. MAGISTR
@magistr_law · 42
1 post
мнение Петрова
@mneniePetrova · 968
1 post
НА’ДЕВАЙСЕ
@nadevaiceya · 56
1 post
Авиатизация Наше небо
@nebo_nashe · 122
1 post
О политике и не только
@opolitikeinetolko · 37
1 post
Атмосферное электричество и крепости-звёзды
@pro_efir · 198
1 post
Экономика. Разбор полетов
@razborpoletoveconomy · 4,646
1 post
Красный альбатрос
@rhfcysqfkm · 2,902
1 post
Роксана Z
@rusroksana · 307
1 post
Дмитрий Сарматов
@sarmatoff · 1
1 post
shturmankai
@shturmanEI · 85
1 post
Сипров. Факты и комментарии
@siprov_comments · 124
1 post
Тема.Главное
@temaglavnoe · 8,296
1 post
Стратегия среднесрок
@tretya_volna · 69
1 post
Журнал Ценовик
@tsenovik · 120
1 post
Укризис
@ukrainesis · 4
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Михаил Хазин
@hazinOpen · 50,002
44 posts
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,167
35 posts
Пятница, вечер! (+ Вторник)
@pyatnica_vecher · 17,780
28 posts
ХАЗИН
@khazinlive · 12,058
24 posts
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение
@KamilAskerkhanov · 27,872
18 posts
Клуб Русской Правды🇷🇺
@clubpravda · 86,947
17 posts
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,603
5 posts
Мир в Моменте
@MIrvMomente · 73,048
5 posts
Клименко cоветует
@germanklimenko · 5,925
4 posts
Фадеевщина | ffad.ru
@ffadru · 25,757
3 posts
"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым
@OilGasGame · 24,820
3 posts
АНО "Мы ЗА перемены".Телеграм канал. Инфо об общественной деятельности, направленной на улучшение качества жизни и безопасности.
@ANOMyiZAperemenyi · 80
2 posts
Китайская угроза
@daokedao · 98,703
2 posts
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,403
2 posts
Стратегия среднесрок
@tretya_volna · 69
2 posts
Новый Век
@Wek_ru · 18,498
2 posts
Твоё второе сердце
@alinka_tradition_spirit · 114
1 post
Ассоциация Семей России. Развитие Образования
@assoziaziasemeyrossii · 576
1 post
DOFA
@ddofa · 203,439
1 post
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,994
1 post
Одет аккуратно. Борода черная
@oabch · 311,097
1 post
Первое концептуальное медиа
@pervoe_concept_media · 2,767
1 post
RED BINDER
@redbinder · 192,197
1 post
Зупини фейк про UA
@zupinifake · 111
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Михаил Хазин
@hazinOpen · 50,002
103 posts
МХ - Моё мнение
@mx_opinion_bot · 10,376
26 posts
Мир в Моменте
@MIrvMomente · 73,048
21 posts
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,202
20 posts
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение
@KamilAskerkhanov · 27,872
19 posts
Тема.Главное
@temaglavnoe · 8,296
15 posts
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,167
13 posts
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,113,787
11 posts
Рамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 150,882
10 posts
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,393
8 posts
ЧАДАЕВ
@chadayevru · 100,847
6 posts
Группа "Финансовая конспирология"
@finconsp · 14,166
6 posts
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 205,226
5 posts
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,603
5 posts
Банкста
@banksta · 439,852
3 posts
DELYAGIN's special
@delyagin · 137,848
3 posts
Дисперсия Каргинизма / Ближний Восток
@karginizm · 38,087
3 posts
ParsToday Russian 🇮🇷
@parstodayrussian · 29,989
3 posts
Избранный Девятов
@APDevyatov · 7,525
2 posts
Буровая
@Burovaia · 40,807
2 posts
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ
@DDrobnitski · 78,953
2 posts
Яковлев Андрей про жизнь
@JecobLevi1960 · 854
2 posts
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 443,771
2 posts
Владимир Левченко
@VlULevchenko · 22,002
2 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 205,226
#1
Михаил Хазин
@hazinOpen · 50,002
#2
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ
@DDrobnitski · 78,953
#3
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,393
#4
Михаил Хазин предупреждал
@mikhailkhazin · 58,619
#5
DELYAGIN's special
@delyagin · 137,848
#6
#МОНТЯН!
@montyan2 · 294,958
#7
Михаил Хазин Публикации
@khazinmikhail · 51,413
#8
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,546
#9
Владимир Левченко
@VlULevchenko · 22,002
#10
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,661,091
#11
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,113,787
#12
Клуб Русской Правды🇷🇺
@clubpravda · 86,947
#13
Каринэ Геворгян. Избранное.
@gevorgyankarine · 108,355
#14
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,202
#15
Мир в Моменте
@MIrvMomente · 73,048
#16
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,167
#17
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 420,007
#18
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 962,361
#19
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,736,455
#20
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,036,538
#21
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 484,806
#22
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#23
МИГ России
@mig41 · 476,345
#24
Китай — Вавилов
@shuohuaxia · 143,293
#25
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко
@mikle1on · 483,540
#26
Банкста
@banksta · 439,852
#27
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,558
#28
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 663,755
#29
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 209,168
#30
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,122
#31
МАРДАН
@mardanaka · 208,266
#32
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,994
#33
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,839
#34
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,063
#35
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 423,348
#36
Артамонов: Оборона России
@nationaldef · 114,736
#37
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 275,861
#38
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 692,737
#39
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,451,986
#40
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 443,771
#41
Саня во Флориде
@sanya_florida · 905,731
#42
ГЕОСТРАТЕГ
@geostrategrus · 123,575
#43
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,200
#44
Захар Прилепин
@zakharprilepin · 221,300
#45
ИноСМИ
@inosmichannel · 142,817
#46
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 469,228
#47
МЕТАМЕТРИКА
@Metametrica · 123,795
#48
Рамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 150,882
#49
КазакоV
@ale_kazakov · 47,108
#50
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 971,105
#51
Юрий Баранчик
@barantchik · 90,600
#52
Дисперсия Каргинизма / Ближний Восток
@karginizm · 38,087
#53
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 493,876
#54
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 737,693
#55
Перспектива
@perspektyva369 · 30,904
#56
Голос Мордора
@golosmordora1 · 147,808
#57
Александр Ходаковский
@aleksandr_skif · 313,254
#58
Дорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,014
#59
Дмитрий Никотин
@dmitrynikotin · 695,684
#60
КРИСТАЛЛ РОСТА
@crystal_book · 58,398
#61
Осташко! Важное
@ostashkonews · 426,398
#62
Говорит Фурсов
@govoritfursov · 129,098
#63
Андрей Девятов. Небополитика
@andrejdevyatov · 25,306
#64
Семен Уралов
@su2050 · 80,288
#65
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 569,137
#66
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 477,766
#67
Это ещё не конец
@nonetutto · 142,478
#68
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 605,158
#69
Маргарита Симоньян
@margaritasimonyan · 505,247
#70
БЕСОГОН
@nikitabsg · 386,994
#71
ШАХНАЗАРОВ
@iikhu · 152,438
#72
Ольга Ускова | Cognitive Life
@cognitive_life · 119,038
#73
Институт Русской Политической Культуры
@fvuchannal · 28,721
#74
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 912,968
#75
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев
@dtlive · 67,287
#76
Орда
@orda_mordora · 161,125
#77
Шейх Тамир
@sheyhtamir1974 · 359,733
#78
Русский Демиург
@rus_demiurge · 114,897
#79
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 750,635
#80
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 330,919
#81
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,130
#82
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,015,419
#83
ГАСПАРЯН
@ASGasparyan · 172,893
#84
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,603
#85
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 428,911
#86
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 192,533
#87
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 567,778
#88
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 503,516
#89
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,556,528
#90
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 658,288
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Владимир Левченко
@VlULevchenko · 22,002
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Алексей Бобровский
@alexbobrowski · 36,950
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Академик для думающих людей
@glazieview · 46,007
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Михаил Хазин
@hazinOpen · 50,002
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Михаил Хазин Публикации
@khazinmikhail · 51,413
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Михаил Хазин предупреждал
@mikhailkhazin · 58,619
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ
@DDrobnitski · 78,953
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
DELYAGIN's special
@delyagin · 137,848
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,393
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 205,226
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Белый Филин
@whitefilin · 22,801
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
Книжный день
@knijnij_den · 45,999
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Институт Русской Политической Культуры
@fvuchannal · 28,721
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Андрей Девятов
@AndreyDevyatov · 35,356
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
ГЕОСТРАТЕГ
@geostrategrus · 123,575
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
ПРАЙМ
@prime1 · 44,026
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
Говорит Фурсов
@govoritfursov · 129,098
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Чёрный Лебедь
@swaneconomy · 140,900
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
ФКТ
@fctaltai22 · 27,578
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Abzalov
@AbzalovD · 43,371
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Константин Сивков official
@Sivkov_K · 23,287
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Константин Двинский
@Kdvinsky · 29,769
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Перспектива
@perspektyva369 · 30,904
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Каринэ Геворгян. Избранное.
@gevorgyankarine · 108,355
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 236 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q1968160 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelMikhail Khazin
DescriptionRussian economist
Official sitehttps://khazin.ru/

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Хазин, Михаил Леонидович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…(18 апреля 2023 он объявил, что доступ к блогу им [https://t.me/khazinml/5993 утрачен]) и являлся создателем и постоянным автором интернет-сайта…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хазин” (@khazinml), 242,575 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khazinml.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.