Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дерипаска. Backstage

@deripaskabackstage

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,127subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003395850646
TypeChannel
Username@deripaskabackstage
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deripaskabackstage

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 20% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

3,470 average views per post against 1,123 subscribers — an engagement rate of 308.7%. Across the 54,238 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.6% and 35.7%, with a median of 20.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled69,340
Mature posts only315.9% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,123 measured 9 August 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 54,238 channels · p10 5.34% · p25 10.6% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.7% · p90 57.3%
Position in cohort99.784th percentile · 15.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.258% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,1091,1271,1186 August 2026 — 1,109 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,109 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,123 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,106–1,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:341,127+4
9 Aug 2026, 09:521,123+12
6 Aug 2026, 18:031,111+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:171,109no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:061,109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
307.6%
avg views ÷ 1,127 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.359%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total69,340
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6927.7%
👍6927.7%
💯5421.7%
🔥2811.2%
👏93.61%
🤣62.41%
👀52.01%
😐31.20%
😁20.803%
😎20.803%
😇10.402%
🤔10.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,300 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Глядя на план мероприятий фонда «Вольное Дело» Олега Дерипаски на эту неделю, понимаешь, что не всякий благотворительный фонд может похвастать таким жёстким повседневным планированием и исполнительской дисциплиной, скорее напоминающей деловую среду. Просто факты. Только на этой неделе - содержательные мероприятия по пяти большим направлениям: образование, городская среда, спорт, здравоохранение и традиционная культу

7😎2

5 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC≈3,180 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня большинство международных экономических организаций, центральных банков и участников рынка сходятся во мнении, что какой-то единственной “главной” проблемы в мировой экономике нет… Однако, это не так. Она есть. Это рост геополитической нестабильности, который вызывает энергетические шоки, сохраняет инфляцию и замедляет мировой экономический рост, что проявляется сразу в нескольких направлениях. Энергетика. Л

💯51👍1

4 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,260 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вот все у нас так: рассуждаем о том о чем понятия не имеем. Депутат Вассерман поддержал идею подготовки студентов к семейной жизни в рамках вузов. Студенчество - лучшее время для получения таких знаний, рассказал Вассерман: «Если им покажут, какие есть сложности в семейной жизни и как с ними можно справляться, то, скорее всего, они будут реагировать на деторождение спокойней». Самое смешное, что депутат Вассерман п

🔥6🤣5

4 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈3,250 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Япония, похоже, попала в ловушку, из которой почти нет хорошего выхода. На поддержку иены уже потрачено около $160 млрд. Но даже интервенции с участием США не решили проблему. Сценарий повторяется: интервенция → иена укрепляется → проходит несколько дней → падение продолжается. Потому что проблема глубже и валютных интервенций недостаточно. Чтобы действительно развернуть иену, Банку Японии придется резко повышать пр

💯6

3 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈3,260 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про страну, где качество знаний всё сильнее зависит от почтового индекса. Часть четвертая Пока карта российского образования выглядит так: на вершине, - Москва и Санкт-Петербург; следом - несколько мощных региональных центров Татарстан, Томск, Новосибирск, Екатеринбург и ряд других крупных университетских городов и регионов. Именно их наличие принципиально важно: они показывают, что качественное образование вне Мос

👍11💯5🔥31

3 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈3,230 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про страну, где качество знаний всё сильнее зависит от почтового индекса. Часть третья Университеты особенно хорошо показывают масштаб проблемы. Более 70% региональных вузов по бюджетному приёму сегодня находятся в диапазоне среднего качества - 56-69 баллов ЕГЭ. С одной стороны, откровенно слабых вузов становится меньше. С другой - элитный сегмент всё сильнее концентрируется в крупнейших центрах. Получается парадок

💯123

3 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,230 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про страну, где качество знаний всё сильнее зависит от почтового индекса. Часть вторая Наряду с двумя столицами, исследователи относят к ведущим университетским центрам также Татарстан, Томскую, Свердловскую, Новосибирскую и Калининградскую области: там качество бюджетного приёма остаётся устойчивым или растёт. Объясняется это тем, что в столицах этих регионов сформирована образовательная экосистема. Казань - круп

👏92

3 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈3,260 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про страну, где качество знаний всё сильнее зависит от почтового индекса. Часть первая Формально любой российский школьник из Москвы, Томска и небольшого города в отдалённом регионе получает одно и то же образование. Есть федеральные стандарты, одинаковый ЕГЭ, утверждённые программы и диплом государственного образца. Фактически это всё больше похоже на фикцию. Фикцию равенства. Главная проблема российского среднег

👍9

3 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈3,250 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, пазл с японской иеной складывается. Мы писали, что США могут поддерживать иену, чтобы не допустить распродажи своего госдолга. И вот ключевая цифра: Япония за три месяца сократила вложения в Treasuries на $96 млрд — до $1,14 трлн. Если сообщения о совместных валютных интервенциях США и Японии подтвердятся, логика становится ещё интереснее. Китай давно сокращает роль американского долга в резервах. Россия пра

7👍1

2 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈5,890 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Благотворительный фонд Олега Дерипаски «Вольное Дело» уже много лет поддерживает проекты по защите уникальной природы России, и Байкал занимает в них особое место. Ведь это не просто самое глубокое озеро планеты, а живая экосистема, чьё будущее зависит от каждого нашего шага. Поэтому заботиться о онем нужно всегда. В этом году экспедиция аквалангистов, несмотря на штормы, холод и плотные туманы, прошла более 200 ки

10

1 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC≈3,380 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

США готовятся покупать японскую иену. Зачем? 31 июля во время заседания кабинета Дональда Трампа в Кэмп-Дэвиде министр финансов США Скотт Бессент оставил на виду любопытную запись: покупка японских иен на $5–10 млрд. Если запись действительно отражает готовящуюся операцию, возникает вопрос: зачем Минфину США понадобилось поддерживать иену? Одна из возможных причин - американский долговой рынок, где Япония крупнейши

7

1 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,310 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну, а чтобы все-таки не было бы уж совсем печально (тут все должны вспомнить про корову), то вот на что жалуются в 2026 году в интернете американцы. Спойлер: политика не на первом месте. 💸 Стоимость жизни - 26% 🏥 Медицина - 17% 🏠 Жильё - 14% 💼 Работа - 11% А дальше — чаевые, бесконечные подписки, авиакомпании, знакомства и необходимость буквально везде ездить на машине. Самое интересное: большинство жалоб сводитс

👍81

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deripaskabackstage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,469 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дерипаска. Backstage” (@deripaskabackstage), 1,127 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deripaskabackstage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.