Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Полковник Трифонов

@polkovnikt

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,875subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416748314
TypeChannel
Username@polkovnikt
DescriptionПолковник полиции в отставке Алексей Трифонов, член Общественного Совета при МВД России, эксперт РОЦИТ. Связь @atrifonovbot Чат @policechat
Created30 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/polkovnikt

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

34,200 average views per post against 20,875 subscribers — an engagement rate of 164.0%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (1 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled479,237
Mature posts only164.0% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,875 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,171 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.51% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.5% · p90 42.3%
Position in cohort99.836th percentile · 14.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.163% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

20,87520,91820,896.55 August 2026 — 20,918 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,918 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,912 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,910 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,902 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,894 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,892 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,885 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,875 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,869–20,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:2320,875-10
11 Aug 2026, 16:4220,885-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:1320,892-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1220,894-8
8 Aug 2026, 14:4720,902-8
7 Aug 2026, 12:2020,910-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:0220,912-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:0520,918no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:4520,918first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
164.4%
avg views ÷ 20,875 subscribers
Avg views / post
34,300
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.062%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (2 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total480,530
Reactions total299
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,330
Videos
1,310
Links
2,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 08s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

498 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20040.2%
9819.7%
🫡8917.9%
😢5511.0%
🤔448.84%
👏122.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 512reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈11,200 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Полицейские почтили память Героя России капитана милиции Евгения Шнитникова. Памятный митинг, посвященный 30 годовщине со дня гибели Евгения Петровича, состоялся сегодня в Автозаводском районе Нижнего Новгорода около дома, где он проживал. Память Героя почтили начальник ГУ МВД России по Нижегородской области генерал-лейтенант полиции Юрий Арсентьев, руководство и личный состав главка, представители органов власти и

👍17🫡61

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,050 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gillotina

Наш уважаемый коллега и соратник, полковник полиции в отставке, основатель проекта «Всё для фронта» Алексей Трифонов вместе с инициативной группой, в которую вошли друзья, одноклассники и родственники бойцов, погибших в зоне проведения СВО, подал заявку в губернаторский проект инициативного бюджетирования «Вам решать!» - о благоустройстве в селе Арефино Нижегородской области сквера памяти односельчан, павших в Велико

10

5 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈261,000 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На моей малой Родине в селе Арефино Нижегородской области, мы с инициативной группой, в которую вошли друзья, одноклассники и родственники ребят, погибших в зоне проведения СВО, подали заявку в проект инициативного бюджетирования "Вам решать!" губернатора региона Глеба Никитина о благоустройстве сквера памяти павших в ВОВ односельчан и установке памятника погибшим в зоне СВО землякам. Всего их 12, и многих из них я з

9🫡5👍3

4 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC940 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IrinaVolk_MVDVideo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Друзья! Сегодня моему папе исполнилось бы 87 лет... 🎶 ❤️ Эта песня - посвящение всем папам на земле. И, представляя её на ваш суд, я хочу обратиться к тому, кто вдохновил меня рискнуть. Рискнуть в очередной раз в жизни и взять в руки микрофон: «Папа, родной! Иногда мне кажется, что вся моя жизнь озарена светом твоего тёплого сердца. Я помню свои маленькие шаги по полу и твои большие, надёжные руки, которы

11

2 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,230 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ru_rocit

Самые важные посты из Telegram-каналов экспертов РОЦИТ на этой неделе ▪️Антон Горелкин @webstrangler Финны решили снести вышки ЛЭП, а заодно уничтожить размещенные на них оптоволоконные линии связи, ведущие в Россию. Они говорят, что линия электропередач больше не используется по прямому назначению, поэтому обслуживать её стало невыгодно (при этом деликатно умалчивают, что это случилось после их же демонстративного

👍4

1 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,210 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сегодня была шикарная рыбалка. Да по-другому с таким гидом, как Константин Горбаченко и не бывает. Объездили половину реки Волга, но свою рыбу добыли. Рекомендую Костю всем рыбакам (профессионалам и любителям) и тем, кто только хочет научиться ловить. Он знает каждую корягу на Чебоксарском водохранилище, привезёт вас а рыбе, ткнёт в нее пальцем (на экране эхолота) и заставит рыбу клюнуть. Приманок у него для этого

👍122

31 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,340 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @webstrangler

МВД отчиталось о снижении количества киберпреступлений. По данным министерства, количество преступлений, совершенных с использованием социальных сетей и мессенджеров, за полгода сократилось на 58%. Уверен, что мы наблюдаем эффект от принятых Госдумой антифрод-пакетов. Они стали основой для системной борьбы с мошенниками: правоохранители, банки и операторы связи теперь слаженно реагируют на сигналы о киберпреступления

6👏1

30 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,500 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @opersvodkiPhoto

⚡️ Павла Дурова внесли в перечень террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга. 🎯 @opersvodki 💬 ОС в MAX

😢9

29 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC≈106,000 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️ Основатель Telegram Павел Дуров объявлен в международный розыск. Ему предъявлено обвинение в рамках расследуемого уголовного дела по статье о содействии террористической деятельности. Поводом послужило использование мессенджера украинской стороной для вербовки россиян. Судя по логике, такие действия в перспективе повлекут признание мессенджера экстремистским с возможностью запрета ведения в нём публичных каналов

👍50🤔35😢105

19 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,020 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ru_rocit

Самые важные посты из Telegram-каналов экспертов РОЦИТ на этой неделе ▪️Антон Горелкин @webstrangler Мы ожидаем, что отечественная ИИ-индустрия будет опираться на верифицированные данные, бороться с галлюцинациями своих моделей и в целом стремиться к их прозрачности. Но и в обществе нужно воспитывать взвешенное отношение к возможностям нейросетей. Ответы, которые дает искусственный интеллект, всегда нужно подвергать

🤔32👍1

17 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC≈39,000 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вот, собственно, и санитары подоспели. Только на этот раз не в белых халатах. Блогера Илью Ремесло задержали в Петербурге по делу о фейках о российской армии. Кто-то сомневался, что его демарш закончится по-другому? Я нет.

👍17👏111

15 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC≈3,340 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Из свидетеля в обвиняемые. Очень жаль парня, совсем молодой был. Семье и коллегам соболезнования.

😢23🫡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @polkovnikt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 179,487 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полковник Трифонов” (@polkovnikt), 20,875 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polkovnikt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.