Channel
@legitimniy
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,016,832subscribers
-384 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001242259852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legitimniy |
| Description | Инсайды, слухи, аналитика, технологии, рассуждение и прогнозы будущего нашей страны! Не живи в иллюзиях - будь в курсе реальности! Контакт: legitimniy@protonmail.com Бот реклама: @Legitimniy_rec_bot |
| Created | 20 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legitimniy |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,016,832 | -7,235 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,024,067 | -3,241 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,027,308 | +8,055 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 1,019,253 | +3,060 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1,016,193 | -5,579 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 1,021,772 | +5,265 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 1,016,507 | -709 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 1,017,216 | first reading |
860 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 135 of 144 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 860 (5 February 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,053,800 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 8 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 3of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.1 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 27.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 64.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 256,500 views — 25.1% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 265,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /229937 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC | 625 minutes – 3.3 hours old | 129,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 76,192 interp. → 3.0 hours: 123,433 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 42 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /229927 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC | 79 minutes – 3.6 hours old | 138,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 79,651 interp. → 3.0 hours: 128,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /229917 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC | 751 minutes – 4.3 hours old | 154,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 82,040 interp. → 3.0 hours: 133,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /229907 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC | 1418 minutes – 8.5 hours old | 202,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 81,100 → 3.0 hours: 124,000 → 6.0 hours: 179,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /229896 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC | 3230 minutes – 23 hours old | 268,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 88,500 → 3.0 hours: 137,000 → 6.0 hours: 158,000 → 12 hours: 211,000 → 24 hours: 268,000still climbing at last reading | 268,000measured | 2.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /229886 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC | 3827 minutes – 27 hours old | 266,000 views ~0 reactions | 60 minutes: 55,747 interp. → 3.0 hours: 119,000 → 6.0 hours: 179,000 → 12 hours: 206,000 → 24 hours: 258,000still climbing at last reading | 258,000measured | 3.7 hours |
| /229876 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC | 392.0 hours – 29 hours old | 269,000 views ~0 reactions | 3.0 hours: 134,000 → 6.0 hours: 184,000 → 12 hours: 218,000 → 24 hours: 255,000still climbing at last reading | 255,000measured | 3.1 hours |
| /229866 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC | 372.7 hours – 29 hours old | 262,000 views ~0 reactions | 3.0 hours: 133,143 interp. → 6.0 hours: 179,000 → 12 hours: 217,000 → 24 hours: 250,000still climbing at last reading | 250,000measured | 2.9 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @legitimniy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 860 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 860 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Закрыл ипотеку за год Игорь больше десяти лет проработал на стройке — тяжёлый труд, постоянная нагрузка, ни дня покоя. В какой-то момент начались серьёзные проблемы со спиной, и стало ясно: физически больше не потянуть. Работы нет, денег тоже, дома напряжение, семья почти распалась. Однажды он наткнулся на канал Влада Белова. Подумал, что всё равно терять нечего, подписался и начал с самых базовых вещей. Инструкции…
#эскалационная_авантюра Очередной результат Зе авантюры. В Броварах почти уничтожен склад компании FM Logistic, класса А. Стоимость этих складов 60 млн $ без учета продукции. Эта фирма поставляла много иностранных товаров в супермаркеты Ашан, Metro, Сильпо, АТБ, Новус и тд. Продуктовый кризис только начинается. Рост цен на продукты только начинается. Его пик будет в конце осени. Закупайтесь! Зеленский готовит вам…
#раскладка Черная зима 2.0 будет в этом году в 3 раза хуже предыдущей, так как: ✔️ инфраструктурная война усилилась, а с ней и разруха. ✔️денег в стране стало меньше. Доходы экономики падают, растёт безработица, банкротства, растёт нагрузка на бюджет. ✔️спонсоры урезают кредитную линию. ✔️ власть не успела и не смогла восстановить/защитить энергетическую инфраструктуру. При этом Украина ежедневно несет потери в газов…
#слухи Наш источник сообщает, что западными спонсорами принято решение Зеленского «постепенно сливать», как отработанный инструмент в игре. Зеленский это прекрасно понимает, вот почему повышает ставки, усиливает эскалацию, таким образом пытаясь сорвать планы сценаристам по его замене. Он пытается спасти себя, а не страну. Явный и публичный разворот Джонсона, который публично открестился от Зеленского и того факта, …
Многочасовые отключения света, дефицит ПВО и ситуация с мостом в Маяках. Что происходит с энергетикой, насколько серьезной становится проблема с ПВО, и к чему может привести ситуация с мостом? В «Политразгоне» разбирают главные события и их последствия. Добро пожаловать в «Политразгон».
#слухи Наш источник сообщает, что каждый массовый налёт БПЛА ВСУ (1000 штук) обходится от 40 до 60 млн $ (цена дрона сейчас составляет от 40 до 60к $, мы писали почему выросли цены). Это было бы сверх выгодно, если бы все производства были в Украине и на этом зарабатывала внутренняя экономика и смежные предприятия, поставщики и тд, как это сейчас в России. Но, так как 80% производства сейчас в Европе, а на 70% дрон …
#раскладка #эскалационная_авантюра Ночью были атакованы предприятия «Метинвеста» в Запорожье, металлургический комбинат Запорожсталь полностью остановил работу. Разрушены доменные печи, которые не подлежат восстановлению. Только отстраивать с нуля. Украина фактически остается без своего металла, а это: - удорожание строительства гражданского сектора. - удорожание строительства фортификаций. - Удорожание строительс…
#раскладка #эскалационная_авантюра Мост в Маяках будут бить постоянно, мы об этом говорили. В какой-то момент он будет критически поврежден, а ремонт будет невозможен, так как русские продолжат удары по ремонтным бригадам, как это делали ВСУ в Крыму. Сейчас Банковая отправила туда много МОГов, но они не смогут противостоять массированному налету, который уже готовится. Как минимум один человек погиб в результате нов…
#раскладка Вот такая проблема у ВСУ кругом и была она уже давно. Просто раньше эти негативные кейсы замалчивались из-за страха бойцов, что их за такое «обнулят», сделают предателями, запишут в СЗЧ, а теперь всплыли, так как солдаты поверили в перемены. Мы сразу инсайдили, что Сырский оставил Драпатому не армию победы, а «потемкинские деревни», где за красивой искусственно созданной картинкой, хорошо спрятаны масштаб…
Al Jazeera опубликовала в своих соцсетях ролик с подборкой видео насильственной мобилизации в Украине. «Вот момент, когда на мужчину нападают, пока он, предположительно, сопротивляется мобилизации, несмотря на то, что говорит, что освобождён от неё. Одесский ТЦК заявил, что не обнаружил доказательств причастности своих сотрудников, но передал дело для дальнейшего расследования. Некоторые украинцы говорят, что подобн…
#раскладка Заметьте как многие из тех кто привёл к этому пздцу, начинают «прозревать», что оказывается страна движется к Совку и Концлагерю. Зеленский не тот за кого себя выдавал!!! В реальности Украина уже давно концлагерь и худшая версия «Совка». СССР в классической форме, в которой жили наши предки - это ещё рай по сравнению с нынешней Европейской Украиной. И знаете почему они прозревают? Они прозревают в тот мом…
#слухи #прогноз Наш источник сообщает, что если до конца сентября картонный Майдан и Федоров ничего не смогут добиться, (а они на 85% не смогут), то Зеленский одержит политическую победу, а весь протест против решений Зе будет свёрнут под месседжем «не начаси», так как кругом будет много проблем, которые необходимо будет решать, да и сама актуальность митингов спадет, многих лидеров зачистят и дискредитируют и тд. Вс…
Showing the 12 most recent of 860 posts we hold for @legitimniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 3,962 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 59 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 206 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Легитимный” (@legitimniy), 1,016,832 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legitimniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.