dragon-dances pinned «Геймчейнджер дальних ударов В октябре русская официалка отчиталась Путину как у них всё прекрасно с НПЗ. Как всё починили, восстановили добычу, появился бензин, а сами НПЗ теперь защищены экранами из говна и палок, не имеющим аналогов ПВО и родина под надёжной…»

Channel
dragon-dances
@dragon_dances
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,669subscribers
-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001248778209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dragon_dances |
| Description | Немножко разбираемся в военке и аналитике важнейших политических процессов. Для конструктивных коммуникаций: @StanData |
| Created | 24 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dragon_dances |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:51 | 9,669 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:27 | 9,678 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:40 | 9,675 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 9,683 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 9,698 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 9,701 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 9,707 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 9,710 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 9,720 | +1 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 9,719 | +6 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:02 | 9,713 | -18 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 9,731 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 9,741 | +30 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 9,711 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 9,720 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 9,730 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 9,740 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 9,741 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 9,740 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 9,731 | first reading |
Engagement
109 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 41.7%
- avg views ÷ 9,669 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,030
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 109 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 109 (27 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 96,720 |
| Reactions total | 2,928 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,700
- Videos
- ≈3,490
- Links
- ≈4,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9m 29s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,215 reactions across 94 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,508 | 28.7% | |
| 💯 | 3,290 | 26.9% | |
| 😁 | 1,827 | 15.0% | |
| 🔥 | 630 | 5.16% | |
| ⚡ | 375 | 3.07% | |
| 💩 | 321 | 2.63% | |
| 👀 | 284 | 2.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 229 | 1.87% | |
| 👏 | 214 | 1.75% | |
| 😨 | 191 | 1.56% | |
| 👻 | 178 | 1.46% | |
| 🤯 | 168 | 1.38% | |
| 😡 | 120 | 0.982% | |
| 🥰 | 112 | 0.917% | |
| 🎉 | 109 | 0.892% | |
| 😈 | 106 | 0.868% | |
| 🤨 | 85 | 0.696% | |
| 🥱 | 80 | 0.655% | |
| 🍓 | 69 | 0.565% | |
| 🆒 | 68 | 0.557% | |
| 11 further kinds | 251 | 2.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ПВОшники Воронежа в очередной раз подтвердили свое высокое звание самых крутейших ПВОшников страны. Малаццы! Хохлы, ну вы поняли. https://t.me/bomber_fighter/26924 Занятный момент, кстати. Теоретически у русских сотни штурмовых вертолётов. Которые могут достаточно быстро преодолевать расстояние в 100 км, сбивать дроны-тихоходы в течении пары часов и если растянуть имеющиеся подразделения, они смогли бы закрывать весь…
🎉39😍22👍9🍾7⚡1👏1💯1
Арахмия: Русские пришли со строгими указаниями. Жёсткая дискуссия. У нас есть хороший импульс для того, чтобы найти решение до конца года. Мединский: Каждая пядь русской земли будет россией возвращена так или иначе. Россия и Украина приблизились к миру после переговоров, многое зависит от позиций Украины и США, а также от того обретёт ли разум Европа. Русских вообще уже пора переименовывать в северный халиват. Или се…
👍41💯17🔥5😁3👨💻2💩2🍓1
Геймчейнджер дальних ударов В октябре русская официалка отчиталась Путину как у них всё прекрасно с НПЗ. Как всё починили, восстановили добычу, появился бензин, а сами НПЗ теперь защищены экранами из говна и палок, не имеющим аналогов ПВО и родина под надёжной защитой. Попутно лучшие друзья русского мира в Америке вроде Трампа и Маска приложили усилия, чтобы снизить результативность украинских дальних ударов. Делало…
👍28👏4🥰4👀2
США и Китай не могут согласовать формат возможной встречи президентов Дональда Трампа и Владимира Путина с председателем КНР Си Цзиньпином, который должен пройти в ноябре в китайском Шэньчжэне. Об этом сообщает The Wall Street Journal со ссылкой на собеседников, знакомых с подготовкой переговоров. По их словам, Пекин хочет провести встречу по заранее прописанному сценарию, согласно которому каждый из лидеров зачитае…
💯58🔥26👍10😁6👻2🤨2🥱2🦄2
Первый день переговоров с участием России, США и Украины в Абу-Даби был конструктивным, но с «русскими тяжело». Об этом заявил лидер Украины Владимир Зеленский. Переводится это как тупые, необучаемые гопники. Гопники хорошо обучаются, когда их бьют. Но только физически. Если Путина били бы за каждую ошибку, ломали кости, выбивали зубы — он быстро сообразил бы, что можно делать, а что нет. Но он сам физически в полной…
👍67💯51👀11😁4👻2😈2💩1🥰1
dragon-dances pinned «Анатомия русских военных потерь Вообще, история русских потерь в войнах лучше всего воплощена в паре строчек: Русый серый волос, мордочки мышей. Сколько полегло вас, дети алкашей. В реальности когда встаёт вопрос русских потерь убитыми, автоматом встаёт…»
Трамп призвал главу UFC стать пресс-секретарем и взять в помощники Хабиба. Президент США Дональд Трамп предложил главе UFC Дэйне Уайту стать «пресс-секретарем Соединенных Штатов». Сенатор США Элизабет Уоррен: Конгресс имеет право привлечь Трампа и его приспешников к ответственности за обман, который они совершают ради собственного обогащения. Я обращаюсь к вам – генеральным директорам крупных технологических компаний…
😁89💯45👍5😍5⚡2🔥2🤨2🥱2
Русские забавным образом пытаются объяснять украинские реалии. И надо заметить, иногда попадают относительно точно. Хотя и в оскорбительной форме. В Украине уже много лет на двоевластие, а многовластие. Украина сегодня - это слоёный пирог, внутри которого на разных территориальных уровнях действуют всевозможные параллельные структуры власти. Это если называть их академически. А если называть по-простому - шайки и бан…
💯133👍18❤🔥9⚡8🤮4🥱4👻2🥰1
Анатомия русских военных потерь Вообще, история русских потерь в войнах лучше всего воплощена в паре строчек: Русый серый волос, мордочки мышей. Сколько полегло вас, дети алкашей. В реальности когда встаёт вопрос русских потерь убитыми, автоматом встаёт встречный вопрос: "А их вообще кто-то считает??" Достаточно вспомнить историю великой дидовской, в которой цифры потерь росли от десятилетия к десятилетию и в итоге…
👍48🍾5👻4🍓3💩2💯2🤮2😁2
Русские будни на "освобождённых" территориях. Портрет тех, кто "живёт" в таких условиях исчерпывающий.
😁62👻7❤🔥5💯3👍2😍2⚡1🍓1
У русских победа на днях. Они смогли отразить украинское наступление в районе Лимана. И даже без потерь. ВСУ в свою очередь понесли потери в 28 единиц. НРК. НРК с автоматическими гранатомётами Mk-19, с АТ-4, НРК-камикадзе. Русские отбились FPV-дронами и Мавиками со сбросами. Событие без преувеличения беспрецедентное. Пока русские в последние дни доказывают, что у Украины нет солдат, никто не хочет воевать, Украина у…
💯111👀17👍11⚡2👻2🫡2🍓1🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @dragon_dances. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bomber_fighter · 525,1306 postsВоенный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 614,4883 postsartjockey
@artjockey · 81,9111 postМиша Жуховицкий
@juhovitskiy · 47,8461 postДмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,8321 postКнига Носовича
@nosovichchannel · 7,6231 postРОГОЗИН
@rogozin_do · 90,8401 postСергій FLASH | Про технології
@serhii_flash · 171,6261 postВатфор | Автострадный think tank
@vatfor · 32,3221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@btvt2019 · 24,172
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
@cynic2020 · 19,727
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
@intuition2036 · 37,583
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@donbasscase · 54,948
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@kopytkoav · 26,674
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@progrevg1 · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
@neoreshkins · 28,822
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
@arrowsmap · 72,499
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
@tenirusi · 24,847
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@apwagner_real · 42,098
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
@sytosokrata · 160,507
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@volyamedia · 47,133
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
@wind_sower · 40,291
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@zvizdecmanhustu · 67,740
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@TyskNIP · 29,434
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@mortisaeterna · 19,281
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
@serhii_flash · 171,626
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@tolk_tolk · 126,403
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@infografo · 21,310
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dragon-dances” (@dragon_dances), 9,669 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dragon_dances.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.