Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Political Animals

Channel

Political Animals

@politicanimalis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,917subscribers

+151 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965399134
TypeChannel
Username@politicanimalis
DescriptionАвторский канал Евгения Бермана https://boosty.to/politicanimalis Связь — в директе YT: https://www.youtube.com/@politicanimalis РКН: https://clck.ru/3N5X4U
Created17 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/politicanimalis

Growth

17,75117,91717,8346 August 2026 — 17,766 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,765 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,770 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,763 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,767 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,769 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,755 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,751 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,759 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,917 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,726–17,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:3917,917+11
16 Aug 2026, 02:5617,906+147
14 Aug 2026, 11:3817,759+8
13 Aug 2026, 00:3417,751-4
12 Aug 2026, 03:0817,755-14
11 Aug 2026, 06:1617,769+2
9 Aug 2026, 08:1417,767+4
8 Aug 2026, 05:5617,763-7
7 Aug 2026, 08:0617,770+5
6 Aug 2026, 11:1017,765-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:2117,766first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 17,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,100
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 June 202615 August 2026)
Views total24,410
Reactions total494
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,440
Videos
8
Links
2,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,414 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍84935.2%
38215.8%
😢28111.6%
🔥24710.2%
🤔1717.08%
👎1496.17%
😁1204.97%
🌚451.86%
❤‍🔥321.33%
🕊311.28%
🤯271.12%
🤷‍♂220.911%
custom 5269439497937916498170.704%
👏110.456%
😭110.456%
🤷‍♀70.29%
😈40.166%
🍾30.124%
😎20.083%
10.041%
2 further kinds20.083%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @politicanimalis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈3,310 views80 reactionsread 18 August 2026

«Я кое-что пообещаю, но ты ни в коем случае не верь» Склонность Дональда Трампа делать потешные заявления на Ближнем Востоке — о том, что США объявят Ормузский пролив своей территорией или что они поддержат восстание иранского народа против кровавого режима аятолл — является, на самом деле, фишкой американской дипломатии, уходящей корнями ко времени иракского вторжения в Кувейт. Когда войскам Коалиции удалось вытесн

👍55🤯107😁4🤷‍♂3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈6,230 views116 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Как палестинцев к Менгеле переселяли Видел, что сейчас Парагвай рекомендуют, как идеальное место для релокации россиян. У меня с этой страной в центре Южной Америки связаны другие воспоминания: во времена диктатуры Стресснера там нашел прибежище Йозеф Менгеле, а до этого — сестра Ницше, которая туда отправилась, чтобы вместе с мужем создать арийскую колонию Nueva Germania. Пока читал книгу журналиста Энтони Левеншт

👍57🤔21😁1410🌚7🔥3👎2🕊2

4 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈7,990 views142 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Деглобализация экономики и глобализация войн У Эдварда Люттвака — военного стратега, консультировавшего Совет национальной безопасности США и Пентагон, — есть парадоксальное наблюдение: современные войны тянутся годами, значительно дольше войн прошлого. Гражданская война в Судане или арабо-израильский конфликт — яркая иллюстрация этого тезиса. Причём общее число войн в мире за последние десятилетия скорее снижалось

👍87🔥20🤔1610🤷‍♀7😭2

1 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈6,880 views156 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Логика успешной суверенизации Стремление государств обезопасить себя от уязвимостей, появившихся через глобализацию, достигает значительных масштабов. Европа отказывается от американских цифровых систем: французская контрразведка (DGSI) не стала продлевать контракт с Palantir и ушла к отечественному поставщику ChapsVision, а в Великобритании прорабатывают национальную альтернативу Visa и Mastercard под рабочим назва

🔥83👍4621🌚3👏2😁1

17 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC≈11,000 views284 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Друзья, в связи с некоторыми обстоятельствами я, Тропаревский Арсентий, временно беру паузу с публикациями. Телеграм-канал, Boosty, Patreon, Youtube и Gapi теперь ведет Евгений Берман. Все дальнейшие публикации будут делаться от его имени — до тех пор пока я лично не сообщу о своем возвращении. А.Т. ❤️ Подпишись на Political Animals

😢207❤‍🔥28🤯11🌚9😭96👍4custom 52694394979379164984

16 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC≈11,300 views191 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Если вы можете сделать это бесплатно, то, значит, вы можете это сделать за деньги В 2016 году в свет вышла работа политического философа Майкла Сэндела «Что нельзя купить за деньги: моральные ограничения рынка». В ней он попытался показать, как проникновение рыночной логики в отношения людей может оказывать на них негативное влияние. Сэндел приводит довольно много примеров вещей, которые нельзя продавать. Например,

79🤔57👍28👎16🌚6🔥5

15 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC≈9,660 views55 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Почему Иран инициировал новый виток конфликта в Ормузском проливе Интересно, почему автор считает, что Иран руководствуется именно такой логикой? У меня немного другое мнение. Здесь надо иметь в виду две детали: ▪️ Исламабадский меморандум — это очень двусмысленный документ с нечеткими формулировками относительно контроля над Ормузским проливом. В пятом пункте говорится, что Иран приложит все усилия, чтобы обеспеч

29🤔13👍6🔥3🌚2👎1👏1

11 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC≈12,000 views77 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Стоит ли мейнстримным партиям подражать правым популистам? Сейчас европейские политики, как на уровне Европейского союза, так и на уровне национальных правительств, постепенно стали переходить от поощрения к ограничению миграции. В Германии канцлер Фридрих Мерц, придя к власти в начале 2025 года, вынес на утверждение законопроект об ужесточении миграционного контроля, который поддержала «Альтернатива для Германии».

38👍18😁14👎3🔥2👏1💅1

6 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈7,720 views109 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Автор прекрасного канала «За четыре моря» после долгого перерыва вернулся к читателям, что радостно. Он, как раз, написал пост о злополучных кондиционерах. Мне многие писали в ответ на мои мысли о влиянии зеленых, что тут, возможно, дело не только в них, а в жутко забюрократизированной системе — чтобы получить разрешение на установку кондиционера, нужно пройти множество инстанций и получить разрешения , вплоть от со

58👍25👎8🤔8🔥4😁3😎2🌚1

5 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈58,100 views211 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Инцельская революция 1979 года Моя подписчица (у меня прекрасные и умные подписчицы!) поделилась со мной цитатой из книги историка Майкла Аксворти по истории Ирана. Она проливает свет на один из движущих факторов Исламской революции 1979 года. И это те, кого мы сегодня называем «инцелы»: В иранском обществе наблюдалась и другая напряженность. Южный Тегеран был полон молодых людей, недавно прибывших из консервативн

👍12433😢18🤔13😁10👎9👏3🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,770 views43 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В чем причина текущего политического кризиса западных либеральных демократий? На этих графиках дается довольно красноречивое объяснение, почему современные западные демократии переживают кризис и взлет популизма. Запас доверия избирателей, который держался на послевоенном консенсусе, исчез, а западные элиты новых привлекательных альтернатив гражданам не предложили. Усугубляет проблему и новые вызовы в виде потока бе

🔥227custom 52694394979379164987👏3😁2👍1👎1

3 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC≈6,280 views38 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Под словом «империя» понимают множество разных вещей. От государств древности до популярных брендов, от формы политического устройства до состояния сознания. Имперскими бывают территория, культура, марш и даже взгляд. Но что же это слово в конце концов значит? О сложностях с формулировкой определения, и о том, почему — со строго научной точки зрения — в мире никогда и не было ни одной империи, обсудим на бесплатной л

🤔20👍8❤‍🔥43🕊2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @politicanimalis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,933 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 125,330
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Political Animals” (@politicanimalis), 17,917 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politicanimalis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.