Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Седьмая печать

@sevseal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,712subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201657935
TypeChannel
Username@sevseal
DescriptionКанал здорового скептицизма Автора можно поддержать пожертвованиями на yoomoney.ru/to/4100117914379473 По вопросам размещения рекламы обращаться к @shredtheline
Created8 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sevseal

Growth

23,71223,74923,730.56 August 2026 — 23,749 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,749 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,735 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,733 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,725 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,716 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,714 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,712 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,706–23,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:5223,712-2
11 Aug 2026, 04:0623,714-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:1123,716-9
9 Aug 2026, 03:1123,725-8
8 Aug 2026, 03:0123,733-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:1823,735-14
6 Aug 2026, 02:0323,749no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4323,749first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.3%
avg views ÷ 23,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,000
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held44 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total440,910
Reactions total5,723
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,530
Videos
190
Links
5,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,467 reactions across 35 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,77239.7%
😁1,27728.6%
👍3327.43%
🔥2084.66%
👎1773.96%
😱1673.74%
🙉1593.56%
👏972.17%
🤔861.93%
😢781.75%
🤨701.57%
350.784%
🤯90.201%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,940 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Особенности национальной охоты. На водителей. Характерно, что та же Baza пишет, что ГИБДД предлагает для решения вопроса явиться лично и с чеком оплаченного штрафа. Пятилетней давности. Без бумажки ты букашка... https://t.me/moscowach/42286

🤬40😱13🤯3👎2👍1🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,990 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ни для кого не секрет, что врачи по всему миру используют ИИ для решения самых разных задач — от ведения записей до поиска ответов на вопросы. Согласно последним данным, в США около двух третей врачей используют OpenEvidence, чат-бот с ИИ специально разработанный для клиницистов. Эта технология уже широко распространена и глубоко интегрирована в работу медиков. Но вот незадача. Новое исследование, опубликованное в

🙉27🔥13😱8👏4🤬41🤨1

12 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈49,500 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В Штатах местный активист борьбы с умными комплексами видеонаблюдения и по совместительству специалист по кибербезопасности Билл Суэринген разрабатывает различные способы обмануть такие камеры. Он создал специальный компьютерный рисунок, который, будучи нанесенным на автомобиль в виде пленки, не позволит камерам распознать его как машину. Изобретение уже было продемонстрировано на конференции по кибербезопасности

👍100🔥63👏13🤔5😁1

11 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈3,670 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, тотальная цифровизация была нужна Почте России исключительно, чтобы клиенты могли медитировать в ожидании перемещения посылок. Сторонние сервисы уговаривают, что пять дней отсутствия информации - это ни о чём . Беспокоиться надо после 14

😁68🤬22🤔6

11 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈3,820 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На днях стало известно, что материнская компания издательской компании USA Today- USA Today Co -: сотрудничает с компанией Palantir, занимающейся разработкой систем слежения на основе ИИ. Для монетизации "полезной информации" о своей аудитории. По словам генерального директора USA Today Майка Рида, цель состоит в том, чтобы "создать общий интеллектуальный слой" на основе данных о читателях, чтобы "монетизировать

🤬42😱14🤨4🙉3😁2👏1

10 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈4,120 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Электронное голосование - наше всё. Народ, похоже , решили не развлекать и не завлекать на избирательные участки всякими плюшками и Яблоками.

😢48😁24🤬22🤔6🤨3👏1

10 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈4,240 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Самостоятельность всё больше входит у ИИ -агентов в привычку https://t.me/investingcorp/41083

😁44🙉20🤬5🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈4,460 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026

За последние два года жертвами северокорейских хакеров стали 1640 компаний из 57 стран, утверждает греческий исследователь. Вангелис Стикас, по его словам, всё это время читал их переписку, получив доступ к командным серверам. Наиболее серьезно за указанное им время пострадали 700–800 компаний. Хакеры Кима получали доступ к их серверам, облачным аккаунтам и криптовалютным кошелькам. В списке пострадавших - криптов

😁45🔥14👍7🙉6👏3

10 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈62,600 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Полицейская база данных иностранцев, живущих в Китае, обнаружилась не так давно в открытом доступе в интернете. В ней были зафиксированы сведения примерно о 700 иностранных гражданах, постоянно живущих в городе Чжанцзякоу. Вся база включала почти 12 тысяч записей. База содержала даты рождения, пол, семейное положение, адреса, профессии, места работы и гражданство. В отдельных анкетах указывалась религия. Платформа

🤬77🙉12😁7😱5🤨21👎1

9 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈4,160 views174 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shevchenkomax_1Photo

The Atlantic пишет, что ИИ становится «дешёвым фастфудом» для детей из бедных семей. Исследование показало, что подростки из малообеспеченных семей чаще используют чат-ботов для выполнения домашних заданий. Авторы проводят параллель с органическими продуктами, которые когда-то стали маркером высокого статуса. Точно так же детство без нейросетей станет привилегией богатых. Состоятельные родители нанимают живого репе

👍79🤬57😢17🤔7😁74🔥2🙉1

9 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈4,240 views236 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zakupki_timePhoto

Френдли фаер.

😁201🔥23👏12

9 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈4,750 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В Штатах всё большую популярность набирают роботы-собаки с ИИ. Их активно используют вместо охранников-людей в индустрии безопасности для патрулирования дата-центров, плантаций и стадионов. Неожиданным образом обнаружилось, что несмотря на дороговизну роботов-собак, их использование для обеспечения круглосуточной охраны экономит от 80 до 130 тысяч долларов в год по сравнению с охранниками-людьми. При этом охранник

🤬51👍16🔥7😁6👎2🤔21

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @sevseal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 82,828 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Не про политику...😄
@lkormacheva · 10
7 posts
НОВОСТИ 📰
@russica2 · 814,904
4 posts
Dauphinois
@le_dauphinois · 6,746
2 posts
☀️ Травник/ традиционная медицина/ Фитотерапия/ Аюрведа/Траволечение/ Народная медицина 🐝 Трепетник /Лекарственные растения 🍄
@travnik_sbornik · 13
2 posts
Хроники Древесного Хаоςа
@xaosdrevo · 102
2 posts
КРИЗИС // crisis-state.com »
@crisis_state · 9
1 post
☀️ ЕДА ИЗ ДЕРЕВНИ☀️ Сельские фермерские натуральные экопродукты ☀️ Вредная еда в магазинах
@eda_derevni · 27
1 post
Анатолий Гагарин. Dum spiro spero.
@gagarin_anatoly · 351
1 post
Люблю Осетию
@iloveosetia · 629
1 post
ИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ
@imotvet · 60,668
1 post
Картина Мира
@kartinamura · 150
1 post
Курганский сплетник
@kurgan_spletnik · 974
1 post
Новости — Legalburo.pro — #юридическиодобрено
@legalburo · 92
1 post
Туринская лошадь
@ludtrud · 5
1 post
Невидимая битва. Сокрытая история цивилизации
@n_bitva · 199
1 post
СИСТЕМНЫЕ БИЗНЕС РАССТАНОВКИ №1. ТЕРЕНТЬЕВА ОЛЬГА
@nastavniknamillion · 342
1 post
Не Платон
@ne_platon · 14
1 post
ran
@nii_ran · 452
1 post
Видео Топор Война Крипта Москва Новости 18+
@novostigaza · 20
1 post
Однако ECOM
@odnakoecom · 222
1 post
Православный апологет
@PravoslavnijApologet · 388
1 post
Сергей Скворцов в Телеграме
@sergey_skvortsov · 972
1 post
Соборность
@sobornost_rus · 54
1 post
STAVER
@staver_stv · 157
1 post
СВОеПраво
@SVOePravo · 3,832
1 post
Tetragrammophon
@tetragramm · 6
1 post
trainview
@trainview · 512
1 post
☀️ СЧАСТЬЕ В ДЕРЕВНЕ
@v_derevnju · 35
1 post
В мире неспокойно
@v_mire_nespokoino · 242
1 post
ВСЕВЕДА🕊
@VseWeda · 13,114
1 post
Завтрак для чемпионов
@Zavtr4 · 201
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мария Шукшина
@mariashukshina · 153,984
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Седьмая печать” (@sevseal), 23,712 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevseal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.