Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пряников о пряниках

@ppryanikov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,404subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180680018
TypeChannel
Username@ppryanikov
Created9 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ppryanikov

Growth

7,3787,4047,3916 August 2026 — 7,378 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,378 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,390 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,404 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,374–7,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:157,404+14
9 Aug 2026, 15:137,390+12
6 Aug 2026, 12:317,378no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:167,378first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.3%
avg views ÷ 7,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,950
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total77,320
Reactions total1,104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,113 reactions across 15 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍47842.9%
🔥21119.0%
18416.5%
😭585.21%
😢554.94%
🥰393.50%
🤔141.26%
🤣131.17%
🤨110.988%
😁100.898%
😱90.809%
🤬80.719%
🆒50.449%
🦄30.27%
🌚20.18%
🌭20.18%
🐳20.18%
🥱20.18%
🥴20.18%
❤‍🔥10.09%
4 further kinds40.359%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,940 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В татарстанском бумажном журнале «Казань», №7, 2026 прочитал большую статью о том, чем и как питались бурлаки на Волге в XIX веке. И так можно догадаться, что пища была очень калорийной сообразно огромным физическим нагрузкам: много хлеба, пшённой каши со свиным салом. Обязательно при каждом приёме пиши был зелёный лук. Интересный факт и про фаст-фуд того времени – сушёные, солёные судаки. В статье выдвигается верси

👍42🔥13🆒3🤓1🤩1🥱1

6 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈22,600 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Удивительно, но даже в разгар сезона цена на картошку в Москве так и держится на уровне 90-100 руб. за кг. Сфотографировал сегодня у нас во Вкусвиле в Замоскворечье. Пока сбывается мой давний прогноз о том, что более или менее качественная картошка в супермаркетах среднего уровня будет стоить $1 за кг. Постепенно люди будут считать такие цены нормой. Плохая картошка промышленного типа, которую выращивают на крахмал

😭43🔥9🤨32🌚2🆒2

3 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈4,460 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Казани в одном ресторане татарской кухни поел конину. Вкусное постное мясо, мягкое. Жалко, что в Москве в ресторанах трудно найти конину. (также трудно найти в Москве гусятину – тоже в Казани традиционно беру её в ресторанах)

👍64😭14🤬8😢8🔥5🦄3❤‍🔥1🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈5,090 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой «татарский букет для мужчин» из чеснока, острого перца и душицы подарили мне сегодня после моей исторической лекции в Национальном музее Татарстана.

🔥106👍58🥰18🤣137😁3🥴2🤯1

24 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈5,790 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(к предыдущему репосту) На мой вкус, Лорх один из самых вкусных сортов картошки. Но промышленным способом его больше почти не выращивают в России, всё заполонили западные гибриды типа Гала. Опять же на мой вкус, все промышленные сорта картошки – невкусные, максимум куда я их использую – в суп. Но самый мой любимый сорт по вкусовым качествам – Синеглазка. Он остался только у малых хозяйств и дачников, потому что при

👍65🔥2219😁7

24 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈4,200 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruseed_ruPhoto

🥔 «Лорх»: как фамилия селекционера стала народным сортом картофеля В средней полосе уже подходит время выкапывать первую молодую картошку для обеденного стола. Подходящий повод вспомнить, с чего начинались отечественные сорта и почему один из самых известных носит фамилию своего создателя, Александра Георгиевича Лорха. Появился сорт не от хорошей жизни: до революции своих устойчивых генетических линий у России почт

52👍38🔥18

23 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,310 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня заехал в питомник у нас в Загорянке. Наш стародачный посёлок по благосостоянию большинства жителей – выше среднего. По ассортименту растений понял, что пользуется наибольшим предложением в этой страте Московской агломерации. Наибольшая площадь питомника отдана под хвойники разных видов. На втором месте – метельчатые гортензии. На третьем – розы. Такой Топ-3 растений. Из плодовых растений на первом месте – го

👍4313🤔5

23 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈3,810 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня День дачника, с чем поздравляю всех причастных!

46👍21🐳2😢2

22 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,270 views115 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Весной показывал в канале, как засеял грядку салатом. https://t.me/ppryanikov/1008 Как сегодня выглядит этот салат.

👍58🔥3225

21 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈4,320 views115 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Но лисички сегодня на ужин всё же будут.

👍80🥰2114

21 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈4,710 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Уж август близится, а грибов всё нет.

😢42😱9🤔8🌭2🤨1😎1😭1

20 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC≈8,050 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Какие продукты в России чаще всего не соответствуют норме? Данные из государственного доклада «О состоянии санитарно-эпидемиологического благополучия населения в Российской Федерации в 2025 году. Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека, 2026». «Наибольший удельный вес проб, не соответствующих требованиям по микробиологическим показателям (например, сальмонелла, кишечная

🤨75😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ppryanikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,632 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пряников о пряниках” (@ppryanikov), 7,404 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppryanikov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.