Channel
@Alsakrandrr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,149subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243772097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alsakrandrr |
| Description | إحدى قنوات مشروع المنار الهادي، تهدف لرصف ونضد نفائس وفرائد الشيخ إبراهيم السكران المكتوبة والمسموعة والمرئية. - للتواصل مع المشروع: @almnaralhady_bot |
| Created | 23 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alsakrandrr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 33,149 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 33,153 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 33,155 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 33,160 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 33,175 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 33,184 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 33,193 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 33,190 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 33,194 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (3 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,234 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
•• تجد بعض شداة العلم في مبتدأ الطريق يولعون بشراء الكتب، وذهنه يعيش قصة مشروع علمي مع كل كتاب يمد يده إليه ليقتنيه، فيتخيل نفسه كيف سيقرؤه؟ وماذا يستخرج منه؟ وماذا سيضيف إليه؟ ثم لا يلبث بعد زمن أن يرى كتبه التي اشتراها من معرض الكتاب السابق لم يمسها إلى الآن بينما هو يدفع عربته في معرض الكتاب الحالي! فتضطرم في صدره أحاسيس اللاجدوى ومخاوف خداع الذات، فتجد بعضهم لا يعترف لنفسه بالعجز عن الجدية في القراءة وسعة الاطلا…
•• أقام المتنبي في بيت من عيون الشعر علاقة عكسٍ وتضاد بين النفس والبدن، وأن النفس إذا كانت همتها عالية أتعبت البدن، وإذا انخفضت الهمة ارتاح البدن!، كما يقول المتنبي: وإذا كانت النفوس كبارًا.. تعبت في مُرادها الأجسامُ وفي بيت آخر نسج المتنبي هذا المعنى بتشبيه أخاذ، وهو أنه برغم أن النحل يدافع عن بيوته بلسع من يقترب منه فإن الناس تغامر لتجني العسل وتتمتع بحلاوته، وهكذا طموحات الحياة، كما يقول المتنبي: تريدين لقيان الم…
•• قد شاع بين أهل العلم ربط كمية المنجزات بكمية العناء، ومن ذلك العبارة المتداولة بين أهل العلم التي يقولون فيها: «بقدر ما تتعنى تنال ما تتمنى». - مسلكيات (صـ٢٠) ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Alsakrandrr
•• وفرة المصادر تتيح لمن يروم الكتابة والتأليف النقول التي يحتاجها، ويظهر أثر ذلك في كتابه، كما قال ابن حجر عن الأذرعي: «وجمع الكتب حتى اجتمع عنده منها ما لم يحصل عند غيره، وظفر من النقول ما لم يحصل لأهل عصره، وذلك بين في تصانيفه». - مسلكيات (صـ٤٣) ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Alsakrandrr
Photo, posted without a caption
•• تمر بالمرء قرارات كثيرة في حياته.. في حياته العلمية والعملية.. تحديد تخصص دراسي، قبول عرض وظيفي، شراء مسكن أو مركب، الخ.. وقد يكون أحد الوالدين رافضًا للقرار.. فيشعر الابن أن أباه أو أمه ليس لهما اطلاع كافٍ يخولهما فهم الأمر ورفضه.. فيدير مقود شأنه باتجاه ما قرر ولا يفكر في استرضاء والديه أولًا.. وغالب هذه القرارات يُنزع منها البركة.. والعاقل الحصيف هو الذي يسترضي والديه قبل أن يقدم.. فإن لم يرضيا فمن يتق الله يج…
•• إذا تأملت العلاقة بين احتياجاتنا العلمية الواقعية الماسة، والكوادر المتميزة القادرة على البحث والكتابة رأيت هناك نوعًا من الفتور في التجاوب السريع ونشر الأبحاث والأوراق العلمية ومناقشة الأبحاث والدراسات المنشورة، وإشعال الوسط العلمي بالإنتاج والتداول والتتميم والنقد والاعتراض والتعزيز، برغم وجود قدر مشكور طبعًا من الدراسات، فأنا لا أرتاح لمسلك القسوة في تصوير الواقع، والإسراف في النقد الذاتي، ونكران المنجزات. وال…
Photo, posted without a caption
•• لقد أثبتت التجربة أن التصورات العامة للكتاب ليست موجودة في (المفردات) بل في (الروابط) بين المفردات، وهذه الروابط لا تتضح للذهن إلا إذا تم وصلها بسرعة، فأما مع الانفصال الزمني بينها فإن الذهن يشرد. - مسلكيات (صـ٧٠.٦٩) ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Alsakrandrr
•• معاناة العلم تثمر الخبرة به، ولذلك ترى الإمام ابن تيمية يستعمل مصطلح الخبرة في تقييم العلم كثيرًا، كقوله من له خبرة بالسنة علم كذا، أو من له خبرة بنصوص احمد، أو فلان لم يكن له خبرة بمذهب أهل السنة، وهكذا، فالخبرة فيها قدر زائد على مجرد العلم المحض، وهي الناتجة عن معاناة العلم وتقليبه وإدمان النظر فيه وتفحصه وتمعنه. - مسلكيات (صـ٤٢) ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Alsakrandrr
Photo, posted without a caption
•• كانت رياضة الذهن وتمرينه وبناء القدرات العقلية مسألة حاضرة لدى المتقدمين من السلف كما قال ابن تيمية: «كان كثير من علماء السنة يرغب في النظر في العلوم الصادقة الدقيقة كالجبر والمقابلة وعويص الفرائض والوصايا والدور: لشحذ الذهن». - مسلكيات (صـ٣٧) ••┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈•• ✦ T.me/Alsakrandrr
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Alsakrandrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 159,246 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“درر الشيخ السكران” (@Alsakrandrr), 33,149 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alsakrandrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.