Channel
@sharefmg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,826subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001028678459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharefmg |
| Description | ما أوسع الكلمة .. ما أضيق العالم |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharefmg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 14,826 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 14,833 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 14,841 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 14,855 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 14,852 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 14,844 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 14,852 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 14,853 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (21 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,084 |
| Reactions total | 1,136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,015 reactions across 23 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 847 | 83.4% | |
| 👍 | 168 | 16.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من الصور المعاصرة للإخفاء من كتاب الله تعالى ما يفعله من يزعمون أنّهم يدعون إلى كتاب الله تعالى ولا يُعلّمون الناس مقتضيات قوله تعالى في حقّ رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلّم: {وَأَنزلْنَا إِلَيْكَ الذِّكْرَ لِتُبَيِّنَ لِلنَّاسِ مَا نُزِّلَ إِلَيْهِمْ}، ومقتضيات قوله تعالى: {كَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا فِيكُمْ رَسُولا مِنْكُمْ يَتْلُو عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِنَا وَيُزَكِّيكُمْ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمْ مَا لَم…
❤6👍3
ما الذي أصاب الشعر العربي في أيامنا هذه؟ استمعتُ إلى قصائد متنوّعة لبعض الشعراء في مهرجان دمشق الدولي للشعر العربي، فوجدت أمرًا عجيبا: أكثر الشعراء حداثةً وتجديدًا هم أكبرهم سنًّا، أما الشباب، فهم بين محاكاة مشوّهة للشعر الأموي والعباسي، يكتبون بلغة ليست لعصرهم، أو نظم مباشر أشبه باللغة العادية، أو زخرفات وبهارج مصطنعة في الألفاظ والعبارات، مع تكلّف التراكيب وكثرة الالتواء، ونادرًا ما أجد بينهم تجربة شعرية مدهشة، وك…
❤22👍9
الدرس الثاني في سلسلة "مباهج الإيمان في القرآن" صار جاهزا في يوتيوب. وسلسلة "مباهج الإيمان في القرآن" هي سلسلة إيمانية قرآنية أبثّها كل ليلة جمعة في الحادية عشرة على قناتي في تلغرام. وهي ترنو إلى بثّ دلائل الإيمان المذخورة في كتاب الله عزّ وجلّ، والإجابة عن أسئلة الفطرة وما يتفرّع عنها تأسيسًا على القرآن وهداياته. وفي هذا الدرس نستكمل مبحث الشكّ، فنقف عند صورة الشكّ في العصر الحديث وأبعاده النفسية والمعرفية واللغوي…
❤9👍2
هناك كذبة كبيرة يرددها أتباع محمد شحرور وذبابهم الإلكتروني مفادها أننا نتصدى لرجل يدعو الناس إلى كتاب الله! وهي كذبة كبيرة سمجة؛ لأنّ مشكلتنا مع شحرور وجميع أتباعه ومقلديه هي معاندة كتاب الله عز وجل، وتعطيل شرائعه، وكل ردودنا عليهم نابعة من كتاب الله وبيان مخالفتهم لمحكماته وقطعياته. وشحرور والشحارير من بعده يخالفون كتاب الله إما بتحريف لغوي عبر اختراع معان حديثة متكلفة تخالف قواعد النحو والصرف والمعاجم وتدل على جه…
❤8👍5
Live stream finished (43 minutes)
Live stream started
بعد دقائق سأكون معكم هنا بإذن الله في بث السلسلة الأسبوعية: مباهج الإيمان في القرآن لنستكمل مبحث الشك والهدايات القرآنية في هذا الباب
❤12👍4
يمكنني أن أجمع بين الأوزاعي وأبي حنيفة، وبين محمد بن عبد الوهاب وابن عابدين، وأن أجد المشترك بينهما أكبر من المختلف فيه. هنا سيقفز متنطع ليقول: هذه نظرة توفيقية عاطفية تتجاهل الخلافات العلمية. والواقع أنني أنطلق في هذا التوجه من منطلقات علمية شرعية واضحة. أول هذه المنطلقات هو النصوص القرآنية والسنية الواضحة التي تدعو إلى تآلف المسلمين وأخوّتهم، وإلى اعتصامهم بحبل الله وتعاضدهم والإصلاح بينهم. يقول الله تعالى: {واع…
❤40
هذه محاضرة جديدة لي، أحب لكل مهتم بظاهرة محمد شحرور وخلفائه، بل ولكل متأثر بهذه الظاهرة، أن يستمع إليها. ناقشت في المحاضرة الظاهرة الشحرورية على مستوى كلي تأسيسي؛ فهي لا تتناول محمد شحرور وحده، بل تقدم تفكيكًا للظاهرة التي كان أبرز منظريها، والتي ما تزال مستمرة اليوم في موجتها الثانية. وقد قسمت المحاضرة إلى ثلاثة محاور: - محور المنطلقات: تناولت فيه المنطلقات الفكرية والدوافع التي أدت إلى نشوء هذه الظاهرة. - محور …
❤25👍5
ثمة حاجة كبيرة إلى أُطر تعالج هذا العقل العربي المسلم من العطب الذي ألمّ به وجعله نهبًا لهذه الأطروحات الخائبة المحشوّة جهلًا وسفهًا. وينبغي لتلك المعالجة أن تنطلق من القرآن، من منطقه الفريد الجامع الشامل، الذي لا يغفل شأن القيم والأخلاق وهو يعلّم مسالك الاستدلال العلمية، والذي يربّي على الإنصاف والعدل والصدق إلى جانب تفتيح الآفاق والاطلاع والقراءة وأخذ الدروس والعبر. ومن السنّة النبوية وآثار الصحابة التي تنقل العقل …
❤30
عن عطبنا الفكري والأخلاقي.. هذه بعض المشاعر والأفكار التي أحب مشاركتها مع الشباب الناشئ تحديدًا، تتعلّق بالاشتغال في الدعوة أو الكتابة في الشأن الشرعي أو نقاش مختلف التوجّهات المنتسبة إلى الإسلام. هناك شعور لدى نخبة أعرفها جيّدا، عازفة عن الواقع وما يجري فيه، مفاده أنّ هؤلاء الذين نناقشهم أحيانًا (كالشحارير من جهة والحدادية من جهة أخرى) هم همج رعاع عقولهم صدئة، وما يتفوّهون به لا يستحقّ مجرّد النقاش لأنّه صادر عن ش…
❤20
تبدو فكرة استخدام العقل بدلا من الاعتماد على عقول الآخرين جذابة لأجيال منقوعة في عصر فرداني، لكنها لا تلبث أن تغدو هباء تذروه الرياح حين ندرك أنه لا وجود لذلك العقل الذاتي الذي لا يعتمد على البشر السابقين وما راكموه من معرفة وعلوم، وما نقلوه من أخبار لم يشهدها، وتجارب تثريه. بل هي فكرة تخترع تعارضا وهميا بين التفكير الذاتي والإبداع وبين الاعتماد على إنتاج العقول السابقة، فلا يمكن الإبداع بلا مادة سابقة يهضمها الإنسا…
❤64👍20
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @sharefmg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 169,751 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شريف محمد جابر” (@sharefmg), 14,826 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharefmg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.