9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,237–60,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 06:42
60,252
-5
11 Aug 2026, 10:12
60,257
-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:42
60,264
-27
9 Aug 2026, 12:37
60,291
-24
8 Aug 2026, 09:32
60,315
-13
7 Aug 2026, 08:28
60,328
-14
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
60,342
-9
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
60,351
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:41
60,351
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.24%
avg views ÷ 60,252 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
36 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
86,878
Reactions total
3,605
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,200
Videos
≈1,790
Links
≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 54s
Average length
2m 25s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,579 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,763
49.3%
🔥
840
23.5%
❤🔥
520
14.5%
👍
163
4.55%
😁
98
2.74%
👏
47
1.31%
💯
34
0.95%
🥰
29
0.81%
😍
28
0.782%
🙏
19
0.531%
😢
15
0.419%
😱
9
0.251%
🎉
5
0.14%
🤣
5
0.14%
🤔
3
0.084%
🤩
1
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,605reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я НЕ ЛЮБЛЮ МУЖЧИН-НАРЦИССОВ
Фраза, которая за последние годы стала очень модной 🤌
Стоит мужчине любить внимание, быть уверенным в себе, амбициозным, требовательным или болезненно реагировать на неуважение, как ему моментально приклеивают ярлык «нарцисс» и советуют бежать от такого.
А я, наоборот, очень люблю мужчин-нарциссов.
Более того, я и сама нарцисс, поэтому прекрасно понимаю, как устроен этот тип личности. …
КТО УКРАЛ ВАШУ ЛИЧНОСТЬ?
🎭Иногда человек настолько хорошо играет свою роль, что полностью забывает, кто он на самом деле.
И это одна из самых недооцененных причин, почему жизнь перестает приносить удовольствие.
Быть мамой - это роль.
Быть женой - это роль.
Быть руководителем, врачом, предпринимателем - тоже роли.
С ними всё в порядке.
ПРОБЛЕМА НАЧИНАЕТСЯ В ТОТ МОМЕНТ, КОГДА РОЛЬ СТАНОВИТСЯ ВАЖНЕЕ ЛИЧНОСТИ.
Когд…
КОГДА ЖИЗНЬ ТРЕЩИТ ПО ШВАМ
Здравствуйте-здравствуйте!
Недавно ко мне пришла женщина. Успешная. Деньги, бизнес, квартира в центре, машина. Всё, о чём мечтают многие. И она сидит передо мной и плачет: «Я не понимаю, что со мной. У меня всё есть, а я чувствую себя никем. Я не хочу просыпаться. Я не хочу жить».
И так как я очень много работаю с такими проблемами, я знаю с чего стоит начинать, поэтому задала ей простой…
Тем временем август неумолимо приближается к своей середине. Эх, так много всего еще хочу успеть, чтобы запомнить это лето таким…ветреным, переменчивым, меняющим ✨
На свидании с любимым городом N*❤️
Болезненные трансформации 2026 года
Фишка кризиса в том, что это необратимый процесс. Если он начался, он должен и будет продолжаться.
И процесс это болезненный.
Это принятие того, что ничего не вечно.
Все заканчивается и находит свой предел.
Поэтому первое, что обязательно нужно запомнить:
Бей, беги, замирай
Делай что хочешь!
Но!!!! Не тормози, не останавливай, не препятствуй процессу разрушений и отмираний, кото…
Традиционное воскресное оцветочивание дома 🙏🏻🤍
Один из важных и любимых мною способов расслабиться, вдохновиться и просто медленно прожить воскресное утро ✨
ЛЕГКО РАССУЖДАТЬ О ЛЕГКОСТИ, КОГДА ЗАКРЫТЫ БАЗОВЫЕ ПОТРЕБНОСТИ
Ваши мысли?
Разбираем на доске!
Поддерживайте формат огнями🔥🔥🔥
вам нравятся длинные разборы с доской?
Важная информация для тех кто давно хотел попасть ко мне на консультацию ✨
Сейчас мы с вами всем миром проживаем множественные кризисы.
Обстановка в мире, отсутвие безопасности физической и финансовой, сокращения, потери, перестройки, вынужденные перемены, которых никто не просил
Вроде принял ситуацию, расслабься!
Но нет с думающим человеком это
так не работает.
Сейчас в консультации с КАЖДЫМ человеком я веду 3 в…
МНОГО СЛОЖНЫХ СОБЫТИЙ ПРОИСХОДИТ В ЭТОМ ГОДУ! КАК СПРАВИТЬСЯ? КАК НЕ ПОТЕРЯТЬ СЕБЯ В ТРЕВОГЕ, НАПРЯЖЕНИИ, ПРЕССИНГЕ И ТОЙ ОБСТАНОВКЕ, В КОТОРОЙ СЕЙЧАС НАХОДИТСЯ МОЯ СЕМЬЯ И Я?
Собираю схему как пройти сложное время!
Поддерживайте разборы огнями!🔥
Вопросы для разбора оставляйте в комментариях👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
🔥140❤111👍27❤🔥8💯5👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @TatFeodoridy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TatFeodoridy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 743,438 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вика Дмитриева @vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 269,869 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Гимнастика для лица @anyclass_faceonline · 471,249 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 256,480 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тата Феодориди” (@TatFeodoridy), 60,252 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TatFeodoridy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
