Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 102 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @starts_thoughts — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
32 measurements spanning 97 days, net -32,882. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 10:16
5
+1
4 Nov 2026, 13:01
4
-40
15 Sept 2026, 03:21
44
-32,770
13 Sept 2026, 13:58
32,814
-30
11 Sept 2026, 17:42
32,844
-10
9 Sept 2026, 03:54
32,854
-29
5 Sept 2026, 23:20
32,883
+27
2 Sept 2026, 11:38
32,856
-3
1 Sept 2026, 08:05
32,859
-9
31 Aug 2026, 09:24
32,868
-6
30 Aug 2026, 07:49
32,874
-11
29 Aug 2026, 06:13
32,885
+9
28 Aug 2026, 05:35
32,876
+54
27 Aug 2026, 06:06
32,822
+49
26 Aug 2026, 07:58
32,773
-7
25 Aug 2026, 08:08
32,780
+30
24 Aug 2026, 06:08
32,750
+45
22 Aug 2026, 16:58
32,705
-16
21 Aug 2026, 09:24
32,721
-8
20 Aug 2026, 11:08
32,729
first reading
Engagement
123 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 123 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 08s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 111 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,569 reactions across 120 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,069
40.5%
👍
1,655
21.9%
🔥
1,462
19.3%
💯
646
8.53%
❤🔥
213
2.81%
🙏
153
2.02%
👏
132
1.74%
😁
117
1.55%
🥰
78
1.03%
🕊
19
0.251%
🤔
7
0.092%
🤨
6
0.079%
🤗
4
0.053%
🤝
3
0.04%
😍
2
0.026%
😎
2
0.026%
🤷♀
1
0.013%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 123 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @starts_thoughts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 123 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Практика благодарности:
Благодарите за каждый свой и чужой успех и достижение.
Если ваша мечта исполнилась у кого-то другого, а вы испытали негативные эмоции, вряд ли оно исполнится у вас! Ведь вы послали сигнал, что это событие вызывает у вас неприятные чувства.
Благодарите, когда ваша мечта исполняется у кого-то другого, искренне радуйтесь, и скоро это желание воплотится и в вашей реальности.
@starts_thoughts
«Если вы общаетесь с 4 миллионерами, то будете пятым» — раскрыл секрет финансового благополучия миллиардер Уррон Баффет
И пока дурачки говорят про дисциплину и мотивацию, умные ищут окружение богатых людей и забирают лакомый кусочек.
А чтобы найти людей с деньгами, не нужно посещать советы директоров — просто добавьте в подписки канал Ставка на успех.
Это сообщество миллионеров, которые рубят правду-матку про день…
Я бы никогда не променял своих больших друзей, свою прекрасную жизнь, мою любимую семью на менее седые волосы или более плоский живот.
По мере того, как я старел, я стал более дружелюбным и менее критичным к себе.
Я не виню себя за то, что съел лишнее печенье, не застелил постель или купил что-то глупое, в котором я не нуждался.
У меня есть право на беспорядок и экстравагантность.
Я видел, как многие дорогие друзья …
Где продлить лето осенью?
Конец летнего сезона — это не повод откладывать чемодан в дальний угол!
Осенью путешествовать даже приятнее: жаркий сезон позади, туристов меньше, а море всё ещё тёплое и гостеприимное.
Мы собрали пять стран с идеальным климатом для осеннего отдыха. В них легко добраться из России (часто прямыми рейсами), а в большинстве случаев — ещё и без виз.
Вьетнам
Во Вьетнам едут за пляжным отдыхом …
У меня был школьный учитель — человек, который в значительной степени повлиял на мою жизнь и на мою картину мира, который сегодня уже не является учителем — он принял монашество. Вот он сказал удивительную для меня вещь.
Когда я был ещё подростком, для меня стоял очень острый вопрос: "Что такое мужчина? Что такое быть настоящим мужчиной?", потому что мое становление как мужчины только начиналось тогда.
Я обратился …
❤50💯10👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @starts_thoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 23 posts on @starts_thoughts as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вселенная счастья | Саморазвитие @happiness_universe · 29,946 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
body_ianguage @body_Ianguage · 8 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
5 умных мыслей @worldthought · 174,940 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Приступ вежливости @etiquette_pv · 29,198 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Мудрые строки @mudr_str · 84,251 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Основы жизни @life_osnov · 100,671 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
Во вкусе не откажешь @vo_vkus · 59,277 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Счастливый Мир | Цитаты @happymir · 113,161 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Правила приличия I Саморазвитие @prav_etiketa · 43,006 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
Мгновение Мудрости @tsitatyu · 41,720 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
Мысли великих | Литература | Саморазвитие @mysli_literature · 65,457 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
МУДРЫЙ ВЕК | ФИЛОСОФИЯ @tsitaty_mudroe_slovo · 36,411 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Книга в 7 утра | Бизнес | Cаморазвитие @readSinceMorning · 47,629 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 26 August 2026
Где твои манеры? • Этикет @etiketmaneri · 75,525 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 August 2026
Ты и Я I Наука отношений @otnoshenia_psi · 62,474 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
Будда @prosvetlennyj · 44,940 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
Меняйся @mmenyasa · 42,535 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
Наталья Грэйс @nataliagrace · 33,348 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
Совершенный организм @sov_org · 86,956 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Сила Слов (Мотивация | Саморазвитие, Книги) @silaslovv · 109,465 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 August 2026
Осознание счастья @oknoVmir · 62,432 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
master_yoga @master_yoga · 8 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Коэффициент Продуктивности @productivity_Q · 26,511 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Психология саморазвития @SilaSlov · 117,492 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“starts_thoughts” (@starts_thoughts), 5 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starts_thoughts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
