Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Другая жизнь | Инал Белгороков

@insidebelgorokov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,494subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111413763
TypeChannel
Username@insidebelgorokov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/insidebelgorokov

Growth

1,4931,4961,494.56 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,496 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,494 subscribers1,4946 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,493–1,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:281,494-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:131,496+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:511,493no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:491,493first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 1,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
272
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (17 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,707
Reactions total549
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

549 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27149.4%
❤‍🔥9918.0%
🔥6511.8%
😍448.01%
🤣213.83%
😁203.64%
👍173.10%
👏71.28%
💯20.364%
💔10.182%
🤗10.182%
🤝10.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 549reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 21 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insidebelgorokov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для нас также примечательно, что Эрих Фромм выделял понятие гуманистической совести, опять же в противовес совести авторитарной. Последняя, по Фромму, хоть и является неким внутренним голосом человека, но это голос внешний, изначально исходящий от иррациональных авторитетов и со временем проникающий человеку «под кожу» таким образом, что он осознаёт его своим. А вот гуманистическая совесть - это совесть иного свойств

🔥3

Signed Инал Белгороков

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC126 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

С биологической точки зрения совесть существовать не может. Исследуя все свойственные человеку биологические программы, мы не обнаружим среди них совесть. К тому же совесть слишком сложна, чтобы быть инстинктом, или рефлексом, или даже чувством. Если мы представим совесть, как что-то биологическое, она тут же потеряет своё значение. Чтобы существовать она должна быть явлением метафизическим, надбиологическим. А это,

10❤‍🔥3😍2

Signed Инал Белгороков

4 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC174 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Продолжение Совесть и вина Когда разговор заходит о совести мы чувствует растерянность. Чувство вины нам знакомо, но существует ли совесть? В действительности, если совесть существует, то она непосредственно связана с чувством вины, однако не тем образом, который подсказывает нам здравый смысл и устоявшаяся привычка. Чувство вины вовсе не является выразителем совести. Скорее, наоборот, чувство вины и совесть состоя

🔥95❤‍🔥4😍1

Signed Инал Белгороков

1 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC351 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Роберт Рождественский - «Лирическое отступление о школьных оценках». Успейте остановиться.

14🔥4❤‍🔥3🤗1😍1

Signed Инал Белгороков

30 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC276 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Продолжение В природе нет ленивого человека, живущего в соответствии со своими личностными влечениями. Как раз наоборот, человеку требуется много психических усилий для того, чтобы не забыться полностью в такой деятельности, остановить себя и уж тем более отдалить себя от неё. Занимаясь деятельностью, которая органична его личности, человек испытывает ощущение полёта, он ловит поток своего таланта, своего потенциала

12🔥6❤‍🔥2😍1

Signed Инал Белгороков

30 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC467 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Если мы хотим жить в здоровом обществе, требование цельности должно побеждать требование успеха. Человек для того, чтобы «спасти свою душу» должен быть свободен от страха социального неодобрения, его ценность для самого себя не должна быть привязана к социальной значимости. Любопытно и то, что однажды реализация Я, если быть ей верным, в результате регулярного накопления обретает такую силу, с которой обществу приход

13🔥7❤‍🔥2💯1🤝1

Signed Инал Белгороков

28 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC296 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Из разговора с женой. Уложили сына и лежим в обнимку. - Зарина: Хочу, чтобы мы старели вместе… - Я: Мы как раз этим и занимаемся.

😁2013🤣7

Signed Инал Белгороков

27 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC303 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это я, уверенно иду к следующей цели - 1400 подписчиков!

🤣14🔥118

Signed Инал Белгороков

27 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC300 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Заблуждение 2: Человек ленив от природы, его необходимо вынудить к деятельности и дисциплинировать. Дисциплина - это замена естественных желаний и потребностей. Другими словами, человеку не требуется дисциплина, чтобы быть собой. Она становится необходима только тогда, когда человеку необходимо быть кем-то кроме себя. Когда Я может беспрепятственно выражать себя, действие становится неизбежным, оно изначально наполн

10❤‍🔥3🔥3💯1😍1

Signed Инал Белгороков

26 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC300 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Чуть далее Мэй пишет: Мужество быть и доверять самому себе, несмотря на собственную конечность (имеется в виду ограниченность человеческих возможностей - моё примечание); оно означает уметь действовать, любить, мыслить, созидать, даже если человеку не дано узнать окончательные ответы на стоящие перед ним вопросы и даже если он знает, что может ошибаться*. Но только вследствие мужественного принятия «конечности», а т

❤‍🔥126😍3

Signed Инал Белгороков

25 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC248 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Продолжение моего эссе «О сущности психологического здоровья» Последний эпизод Сторонники академического образования (я осознаю, что академическое образование может быть разным, однако веду речь про тот вариант, который присутствует в нашем нездоровом обществе) прикрываются аргументом, что человек, не пропущенный через «образовательный конвейер» и решивший мыслить самостоятельно, это потенциальный преступник - тот,

18❤‍🔥3😍3

Signed Инал Белгороков

25 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC219 views58 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Я дописал книгу! Сейчас вношу некоторые корректировки. А затем останется лишь её издать. Надеюсь, меня не постигнет участь Мартина Идена. Но даже если постигнет, я готов. Я писал эту книгу в обе стороны: и в сторону читателя, и в свою. Мне хотелось услышать голос своих собственных мыслей, прорывающийся сквозь всё, что я знаю. Мне хотелось не знать, а мыслить. Начать с пустоты. Поставить под сомнение незыблемое, что

34🔥12👏6❤‍🔥5😍1

Signed Инал Белгороков

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @insidebelgorokov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 294,066 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Другая жизнь | Инал Белгороков” (@insidebelgorokov), 1,494 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insidebelgorokov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.