Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Smart | Медиа про психологию

@smart_inc_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,382subscribers

+199 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364407627
TypeChannel
Username@smart_inc_psy
DescriptionИздание о психологии, профессии и людях. Разбираем, как устроена психика и что за этим стоит. Медиа института психологии Smart. 🎓 Приёмная комиссия: https://clck.ru/3RYAs7 📚 Более 30 000 студентов Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3EiMrw
Created29 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/smart_inc_psy

Growth

23,18323,38223,282.56 August 2026 — 23,183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,270 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,276 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,280 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,283 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,323 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,381 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,382 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +199. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,153–23,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:3623,382+1
13 Aug 2026, 13:0423,381+58
12 Aug 2026, 10:4723,323+40
11 Aug 2026, 09:3323,283+3
10 Aug 2026, 13:0223,280+4
9 Aug 2026, 16:0223,276+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:4123,275+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:3023,270+31
6 Aug 2026, 22:2123,239+56
6 Aug 2026, 10:0323,183first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.68%
avg views ÷ 23,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
861
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held30 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total25,838
Reactions total847
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,110
Videos
227
Links
1,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

847 reactions across 30 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31637.3%
👍17720.9%
🔥17620.8%
😁637.44%
🤔374.37%
🎉344.01%
😢242.83%
💯141.65%
🙏60.708%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 847reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC480 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Обычно такие предложения прячут, а мы отдаём в один клик 😏 Забирайте скидку на программу «ICF-коучинг» и курс по профайлингу в подарок. Ссылка для тех, кто заглянул под спойлер и готов действовать: https://smart-inc.ru/action1408

4🔥4👍2

14 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC649 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

10 минут рисования в день спасают от стресса и перезагружают нервную систему 🎨 Исследование The Washington Post доказывает: монотонные линии и каракули включают парасимпатическую систему (ту, что называют режим «восстановления»), замедляют сердцебиение, снижают мышечное напряжение и возвращают уровень кортизола в норму. Уметь рисовать не нужно. Главное правило — никакого перфекционизма: забудьте про ластик и оценку

9👍6🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC737 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

18👍4💯3🔥3😢1

13 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC729 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как перестать откладывать всё на потом: 5 шагов от психологов The New York Times Прокрастинация — это не просто лень. Психологи в материале The New York Times поделились простыми шагами, которые помогут сдвинуться с мёртвой точки и не скатиться в депрессию и тревогу. Начните с лёгкой победы Если задача кажется огромной, спросите себя: «Какой маленький шаг я могу сделать прямо сейчас?». Не требуйте от себя немедлен

10👍6🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC844 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Самое время прислушаться к словам Эриха Фромма, пока лето не закончилось: «Одержимость только лишь работой так же точно может свести с ума, как и полное безделье. Только сочетание труда с радостным отдыхом позволяет выживать» Из книги «Иметь или быть», 1976 год. Труд был, настало время для отдыха. Так что закрываем ноутбуки и отправляемся искать тот самый баланс — пока календарь ещё позволяет. ❤️ — Фромм ерунды н

23🔥8💯5

11 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,030 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Самая опасная книга Карла Юнга 50 лет пролежала в банковском хранилище 📕 История «Красной книги» (Liber Novus) началась в 1913 году, когда Юнгу было 38 лет. Переживая тяжёлый кризис после конфликта с Фрейдом, психиатр решился на смелый эксперимент. Он намеренно погружал себя в галлюцинаторные состояния (метод «активного воображения») и фиксировал свои видения, сны и фантазии. Сам каллиграфически переписывал текст и

12🔥11👍6🤔3😁1

11 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC994 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

100% успеха строится на 1% маленьких действий 👍 Глобальные планы требуют огромного ресурса, которого в моменте может просто не быть. Вместо того чтобы пытаться сделать всё за один день, гораздо эффективнее внедрять изменения по чуть-чуть. В карточках разобрали способ, который помогает двигаться к целям, даже когда на масштабные планы совсем нет сил. А увидеть, как это работает на практике, можно на открытой коуч-с

🔥94👍3

10 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC958 views43 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Почему в мире заговорили об опасности «цифровой» любви? Китаянка Ян Юнци обменялась со своим ИИ-парнем 280 тыс. сообщений за год. Он был идеальным: всегда слушал, не спорил и дарил безусловную любовь, которой она не находила в реальной жизни. А 15 июля он исчез навсегда. «Я чувствовала, будто не могу больше жить. Каждый день я только плакала», — призналась девушка. Её история — лишь одна из тысяч. В июле в Китае в

20😁14🤔9

10 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC864 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Хватит расстраивать княгиню Ольгу! 😅 Пить магний при тревоге — это, конечно, прекрасно, но проблему навязчивых мыслей он не решит. Чтобы убрать саму причину, важно работать с мышлением. На открытом уроке «Как побороть стресс и тревогу» вы разберётесь, как когнитивные искажения усиливают тревожность, научитесь замечать разрушающие установки и менять их на поддерживающие. ⏭ Получить доступ и забрать 3 техники КПТ дл

8😁7🔥4👍2

9 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Тесты по психологии, которые помогут понять себя, — пользователь сети собрала в один список: от реакций на стресс до способов достигать целей. ➡️ Тест Бравермана Предлагает определить, какой нейромедиатор (например, дофамин, серотонин или другой) влияет на особенности личности. Воспринимать результаты как диагноз не стоит, но многие описания оказываются точными и дают пищу для размышлений. ➡️ Личная эгограмма Тес

10👍7🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @smart_inc_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,872 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Smart | Медиа про психологию” (@smart_inc_psy), 23,382 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smart_inc_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.