Не монархия, а бьютиархия!
Популяризируем науку, красоту, велнес и сохраняем молодость
by Ксения Бейнарович — врач антивозрастной медицины, нутрициолог и жена пластического хирурга
PR/AD: @ksb_pr
( по личным: @beautyarchy )
РКН https://clck.ru/3ExBaN
Created
30 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +674. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,746–23,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:15
23,521
+167
12 Aug 2026, 21:57
23,354
+66
12 Aug 2026, 00:22
23,288
+124
10 Aug 2026, 22:36
23,164
+55
9 Aug 2026, 21:52
23,109
+45
9 Aug 2026, 00:52
23,064
+97
7 Aug 2026, 23:34
22,967
+49
7 Aug 2026, 00:57
22,918
+71
6 Aug 2026, 03:47
22,847
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 23,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,660
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
17 (31 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
62,170
Reactions total
3,132
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,090
Videos
≈620
Links
≈822
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,982 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,374
46.1%
❤🔥
1,055
35.4%
custom 5307606342561705418
435
14.6%
💔
118
3.96%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beautyarch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,880
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,890
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqv3eEzX
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Соберусь с мыслями-силами, и напишу на днях пост про этот, простигосподи, pizdation.
Причём, у меня нет никакого негатива в сторону агонистов GLP-1 (препаратов), это клинический прорыв, помогающий миллионам людей (я даже свою маму сейчас веду лично на таком препарате, и то, как качественно и с какой скоростью мы выровняли её показатели и состояние, избежав диабета — это вау!).
Негатив именно к культуризации больной…
‼️ 🆘 Я надеюсь, здесь никто не пропустил, что уже скоро завершится наш ОГРОМНЫЙ розыгрыш кучи косметики и сертификатов в ЗЯ?
Всё, что нужно сделать — это нажать кнопку в этом посте
t.me/beautyarch/7039
И, конечно же, читать лучшие каналы в телеграм:
/ Настю Бесит всё — королеву мемов и амбассадорку банок от прыщей на спине. Плохое она ругает так, что аж страшно, собирает энциклопедию находок для жирной кожи (ту…
Если вы думаете, что полезных постов в последние дни стало меньше, потому что я решила успевать наслаждаться летом… увы, нет. Я выбрала страдать — я выбрала ✨переезд✨ в другой город, первый в моей жизни.
И, к сожалению, он ещё и выпал на ‘коридор затмений’, которым всех пугают сейчас. Видимо поэтому всё это так тяжело тянулось, вещей как будто не становилось меньше при разборе-сборе. При том, что ко мне приезжали др…
Хочется уже тот уровень жизни, когда тебя начинают волновать слишком худые (?) пальцы на ногах, и ты идёшь искать врача, кто уколет в них гиалуронку 😆😆😆 а не вот это вот всё…
Небольшие сплетни-скандалы сегодня на повестке.
Allies of Skin отзывает весь свой спф THE ONE invisible sunscreen gel!
Не одну неудачную партию, а вообще весь продукт и все поставки. Формулировка самого бренда предельно откровенная: средство не обеспечивает надёжно ту защиту SPF 50, которая указана на этикетке. Были жалобы, люди получали с ним солнечный ожог.
Отзыв добровольный, проводится с ведома FDA. И учитывая,…
Не спите? А вы ведь ещё не видели, какие коробки косметики я собрала вам для нашего с девочками розыгрыша…
Кстати, напоминаю, что победителей будет ВОСЕМЬ, так что шансы на победу действительно велики! Скорее жмите кнопку в посте для участия 🫶🏼 t.me/beautyarch/7039
— 1 БОКС, чисто корейский эксклюзив, очень многие позиции просто не продаются в РФ:
гидрофильное масло Be the skin, пенка Ma:nyo, рисовый тонер I’m from…
Есть категория пациентов, которых узнаёшь ещё до того, как откроешь их анализы. Приходят с папкой чуть ли не всех существующих обследований, где всё хорошо: ферритин в норме, щитовидка спокойна, витамин D подтянут итд. И при этом им не спится нормально, где-то что-то болит / тянет, ЖКТ живёт своей жизнью. Врачи честно ищут хоть какую-то патологию, а находят тревогу, которая просто выбрала телесный язык.
Так вот, к ч…
В посте-разборе аутоиммунного гастрита (им болеет Брайан Джонсон, и его врачи за >2 млн долларов не могли за все эти годы вычислить процесс), я упоминала о том, что сама поддерживаю свой уровень железа добавкой с мягкой дозировкой в биодоступной форме. В комментариях поделилась, что у меня добавка бренда BIODOC.
Я ранее уже рассказывала, что это отличный, максимально рабочий наш бренд БАДов с хорошими составами, цен…
Как я обожаю такие новости! Учитывая, что я врач, мне 30, и я ещё хочу защититься (стать к.м.н.) в ближайшие годы 😂
Но, справедливости ради (и что лично для меня не умаляет позитивности новости), Кэмерон, по сообщениям источников, в первых родах обращалась к суррогатному материнству после нескольких лет попыток зачать самостоятельно, а по второму и третьему ребёнку они с мужем вообще не раскрывали никаких деталей и …
Там что-то в запретграме фитмосту наваливают. Ну я тоже вставлю свои пять копеек, так и быть, но не на языке эмоций, а на языке фактов и права.
Я являюсь клиентом фитмост чуть ли не с самого начала. Тогда ещё было крайне мало студий, входящих в их абонемент, прям единицы, но я была терпелива и наблюдала за расширением компании с радостью. Потому что это супер удобно — единый абонемент для посещения разных студий и з…
Помните эту загорелую женщину из поста про сумку? Забудьте 🥵😁 моё лицо теперь такое же белое, как будто я и не жила на море ещё 10 дней назад…
А все потому, что по приезде начала умываться с этой новой энзимкой от Skinjestique. Думала, просто следы от бывших прыщей шведского стола поскорее сведу… ага, свела ))) и теперь мы знаем, что ей реально можно осветлить вообще всё 🥹, так что если вам есть, где осветляться — с…
❤🔥118❤69custom 530760634256170541824
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @beautyarch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 205,736 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Правьте балом!” (@beautyarch), 23,521 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautyarch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
