Channel
@olgavollkova_exp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,750subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001414672578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olgavollkova_exp |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olgavollkova_exp |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 1,750 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 1,756 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 1,762 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,765 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 1,766 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 1,770 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 1,769 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,773 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 1,777 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,778 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 1,778 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 22 | 32.8% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 31.3% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 17.9% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Все говорят, что изменился рынок. Но произошло кое-что гораздо более серьезное. И пока мы пытаемся решить внутренние изменения внешними инструментами: новыми воронками, Threads, Telegram, Reels и нейросетями, ничего принципиально не меняется. "Мне просто не хватает мотивации" Последние пару лет я все чаще слышу эту фразу от экспертов. И самое интересное, что говорят ее не новички, а люди, которые уже умеют зарабат…
🔥6❤🔥4❤1👍1
Мой первый длиннющий июнь за много лет Обычно летние месяцы пролетают молниеносно. Только вроде наступило лето и уже сентябрь. Но я продолжаю учиться замедляться и наполнять жизнь не только большими событиями, а кайфовать от маленьких моментов. Именно из них вдруг складывается ощущение, что жизнь не пролетает мимо тебя на скорости 200 км/ч. Событий было много, а фотографий мало. Но, возможно, это даже прекрасно) Это…
❤9🔥5😍2👍1
Почему люди заходят в ваш блог… и уходят, хотя могли бы купить? Очень часто мы думаем, что нам надо больше подписчиков и больше клиентов, а потом заходишь в блог и там вообще не понятно кто вы, чем можете помочь, почему вам можно доверять и что у вас купить. И поэтому подписчик уходит и тем более не становится клиентом. Не потому что вы плохой эксперт, а потому что человек просто потерялся. Представьте, что вы зашл…
💯6👍5🔥5
На прошлой неделе выступала в Кубатуре с практикумом для дизайнеров интерьера и не только. Говорили на очень актуальную тему: как дизайнеру не потеряться в меняющемся рынке и привлекать клиентов онлайн. Мне всегда нравятся такие встречи не только потому, что я могу поделиться своим опытом, но и потому, что каждый раз знакомлюсь с удивительно интересными людьми. Людьми, которые любят свое дело, создают красивые прост…
❤5👍3🔥2
Практикум: «Как дизайнеру не потеряться в кризисном рынке и привлекать клиентов онлайн» Рынок меняется и теперь клиенты выбирают дольше. Сарафан уже не всегда даёт тот поток, который был раньше. А соцсети для многих дизайнеров до сих пор остаются чем-то хаотичным: "некогда", "непонятно что выкладывать", "не люблю продавать". На практикуме разберём: ✔️ как сегодня клиенты выбирают дизайнеров ✔️ почему хороших проект…
🔥3❤2👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @olgavollkova_exp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Волкова | Академия экспертов” (@olgavollkova_exp), 1,750 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgavollkova_exp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.