Ответы на все вопросы FAQ: https://teletype.in/@amelisoul_master/faq
Автор Метода легализации правды.
Ведущая шоу Метод.
Автор книги бестселлера «Ты - причина»
5231328057
Created
22 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,904–106,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:36
105,935
-6
11 Aug 2026, 08:43
105,941
-30
10 Aug 2026, 07:07
105,971
-52
9 Aug 2026, 09:53
106,023
-32
8 Aug 2026, 09:51
106,055
-37
7 Aug 2026, 11:55
106,092
-52
6 Aug 2026, 13:17
106,144
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.74%
avg views ÷ 105,935 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,140
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
14 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
99,890
Reactions total
7,652
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,260
Videos
≈1,460
Links
≈1,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,652 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,547
46.4%
🔥
1,653
21.6%
💯
987
12.9%
🥰
470
6.14%
👍
204
2.67%
🙏
188
2.46%
❤🔥
133
1.74%
😍
124
1.62%
👏
99
1.29%
😱
82
1.07%
🤣
61
0.797%
😁
55
0.719%
👀
37
0.484%
💋
7
0.091%
🤩
5
0.065%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,652reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amelisoul_master. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дорогие, хочу вам рассказать о самом важном событии этого лета♥️
Меня пригласили выступить на уникальном фестивале «Единение», который пройдет 22-23 августа.
Это особенный ивент с глубокой философией, и при этом сильной программой — с удовольствием приглашаю, будет приятно там с вами увидеться!
Вместе со мной будут выступать Леонид Тальпис, Сати Казанова, Имрам Крийя, Анфиса Чехова, Артем Дюкарев, Дарина Богданова…
У меня смешалось в одну точку множество процессов:
- я до сих пор перевариваю всю красоту и глубину концерта и музыки Вани Дмитриенко. Не могу остановиться смотреть записи, слушать стихи.
- поездка по Армении по храмам и святым местам
Погружение вглубь себя максимальное, Мариинская впадина. И я не знаю сколько времени понадобится, чтобы мне вынырнуть. И кем я вынырну обратно.
Подскажите - а критерий художественной глубины в чем измеряется? Как ее вообще можно определить и можно ли?
Популярность можно определить в количестве слушателей, в количестве хитов.
Коммерческий успех тоже можно определить в цифрах.
А художественная глубина, за которую вы хотите зацепить - в чем измеряется? В граммах, в штуках, в метрах, в людях? В чем?
Или есть потребность обвинить артиста в отсутствии того что…
Я, скорее, хотела сказать о другом.
То, что артист собирает стадионы, искренен и много работает, вызывает уважение. Но это не является критерием художественной глубины.
Миллионы людей любили и любят самых разных исполнителей - от группы Ласковый май до ABBA, от Филиппа Киркорова до Pink Floyd. Кто-то собирает огромные стадионы, кто-то камерные залы на тысячу человек. Это говорит о востребованности, но не определяет х…
Сколько отличников, кто круто учится в школе и подает надежды - потом бросают, не достигают успеха во взрослой жизни, сдаются.
Сотни и тысячи людей.
Сколько людей просто не может справиться с собой и со своей жизнью? Миллионы!
Снова обесценка чужих трудов.
Месси не родился с мячом в один день.
Я мать и рожала ребенка, так вот ответственно вам заявляю, что люди когда рождаются - не умеют ничего. Засыпать, есть, поворачиваться - всему учатся.
Никто не был собой сразу, всему приходилось учиться.
И сколько талантливых людей не развили свой талант! Миллионы!!!
Миллионы людей каждый день не справляются со своими талантами. Боятся их проявля…
Да, коммерческий успех на лицо.
Но, думаю, не стоит сажать человека на пьедестал.
Получается писать, получается петь, формат попадает под вкусы большинства.
Как Пушкин, например.
Он не вкладывал сотни часов в обучения и терапию, и не работал годами 24/7, чтобы стать успешным поэтом.
Он им был уже сразу.
Ровно как и не было такого, что Лионель Мессии не неумел бить по воротам.
Он, когда только взял в руки мяч, …
«Мы так часто случайно ломаем все то, что и так своей хрупкостью дышит.
И глядя на трещины, молим о том, чтобы всё залатал кто-то свыше…»
20 лет человеку… столько мудрости в текстах
Меня удивляет с какой легкостью можно обесценить всё и свести до простой эстрады для подростков.
Помимо музыки, которая трогает сердце - есть искренность.
Насколько искренне Ваня говорит с людьми, насколько искренне удивлен, что у него получилось сделать этот концерт.
В 20 лет собрать стадион Лужники, 70 тысяч человек.
Некоторые в 20 лет не могут собрать себя, и хотя бы перезвонить, когда обещал, а не то что собр…
Юлия, неожиданно, что из всего многообразия глубокой и талантливой музыки вас зацепила простая эстрада для подростков. Творчество Дмитриенко милое, но музыкально очень поверхностное. Впрочем, каждому свое
😁37❤27😱10👏6💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @amelisoul_master. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@amelisoul_master edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 23,924 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Татьяна Мужицкая и все-все-все @muzhitskaya · 165,244 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Вика Дмитриева @vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 269,869 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Тимофей Кармацкий @karmatsky_timofey · 186,950 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Аяз @AyazShabutdinov · 181,163 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 256,480 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Центр трансформации и развития личности Анастасии Анисимовой @neirografica_formagiclife · 167,408 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Анастасия Тарасова Nastya_Docs @nastya_docs · 155,042 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Госуслуги: для родителей @gosuslugiforparents · 678,945 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА @shamilahmadullin · 180,355 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Семейка ботов @FamilyBots · 704,200 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Сатья. Официальный канал @satyadas_official · 199,316 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Виктория Боня @bonyaviktorya · 626,029 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе @profinansy · 582,991 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Эндокринолог Магеря @magerya · 291,039 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Магеря Чистка @mageryachistka · 157,876 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Доктор Зубарева / Doctor Zubareva @doctor_zubareva · 407,808 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Гимнастика для лица @anyclass_faceonline · 471,249 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Helena Kornilova / Елена Корнилова @helenkornilova · 183,862 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Masha Blinova. Маша Блинова. Фитнес @mashablinovafit · 278,864 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики @dr_ales · 471,345 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Доктор Виктория Орлинская @cardiodokstories · 160,300 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS @formemas · 185,821 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 263,201 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Ивлиева” (@amelisoul_master), 105,935 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amelisoul_master.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.