Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Против нашей воли

Channel

Против нашей воли

@shahova_online

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,440subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742875331
TypeChannel
Username@shahova_online
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shahova_online

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4402,5002,4707 August 2026 — 2,498 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,500 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,498 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,490 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,488 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,486 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,483 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,449 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,440 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,431–2,509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 09:202,440-9
12 Sept 2026, 04:592,449-34
7 Sept 2026, 12:212,483-3
3 Sept 2026, 00:362,486-2
30 Aug 2026, 17:062,488+1
28 Aug 2026, 00:222,487-3
24 Aug 2026, 16:222,490-5
21 Aug 2026, 07:462,495-3
15 Aug 2026, 06:132,498-2
11 Aug 2026, 11:252,500+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:232,498no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:182,498first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,578 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
89556.7%
🔥35822.7%
custom 545390174623132562222714.4%
💯825.20%
😭80.507%
😁40.253%
😱30.19%
🐳10.063%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shahova_online. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2025 to 31 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 May 2026, 06:17 UTC955 views125 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

3️⃣7️⃣ У меня сегодня день рождения. Принимаю поздравления в виде лайков, репостов любых моих постов, комментариев, сообщений в лс канала, голосов за канал и донатов на Boosty. 🤗 Спасибо, что вы тут, со мной, читаете мои переводы и делитесь книгой «Против нашей воли». Для меня это очень важно и ценно. P.S. Летом я решила устроить себе каникулы, поэтому новых переводов выходить не будет. Обнимаю!

85custom 545390174623132562222🔥14💯4

26 May 2026, 09:41 UTC≈3,460 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🏷Легальная проституция — преступление против человечества? (2025) Перевела статью на русский язык. Что внутри: 1️⃣ Последствия легализации/декриминализации проституции; 2️⃣ Преступления против человечества согласно Римскому статуту; 3️⃣ Шведская модель и результаты после её принятия; 4️⃣ Международная судебная практика; 5️⃣ Совершение преступлений против человечества в рамках проституции; 6️⃣ Элементы преступлений

🔥39custom 54539017462313256221812💯2

22 Apr 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,520 views172 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Считайте меня злопамятной, но я отправила заказное письмо на телеканал «Россия» с требованием уволить Соловьёва. Надеюсь, руководство телеканала поймет, что общественный резонанс, иск Виктории Бони и проверка СК по запросу Ксении Собчак являются достаточными основаниями для увольнения журналиста-женоненавистника. Никто не имеет права оскорблять и унижать женщин. Каждый, кто так делает, должен нести за это ответстве

98custom 545390174623132562238🔥34🐳1😁1

1 Apr 2026, 06:55 UTC≈2,290 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

⚡️Помните, мы с вами голосовали за инициативу о принятии закона о домашнем насилии? (раз и два) Дело движется, но очень медленно. На данном этапе экспертное заключение и материалы инициативы направлены в Правительство, которое теперь должно подготовить законопроекты и внести их в Госдуму для рассмотрения. Прошло 4 месяца, но до сих пор никаких законопроектов мы не увидели. Сейчас очень важно объединиться, привлечь

35🔥15💯10

17 Mar 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,700 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самое сложное, когда делаешь какой-то проект, — отпустить его в мир. Когда ты больше ничего не контролируешь, и остается только наблюдать, что с ним будет дальше и какой будет реакция людей.🧘‍♀ Когда я доделала перевод книги «Против нашей воли», я не ждала большого количества откликов, ведь тема довольно тяжёлая... Именно поэтому я так удивилась, когда увидела, что книгу рекомендуют в рилсах, репостят в свои Telegra

80custom 545390174623132562216

9 Mar 2026, 07:49 UTC≈4,000 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🏷10 доводов против легализации проституции Что происходит, когда к проституции относятся как к «секс-работе», а не как к сексуальной эксплуатации и насилию над женщинами? И что происходит, когда такая страна, как Швеция, отвергает легализацию и направляет свои усилия на борьбу со спросом? Читать перевод статьи: https://teletype.in/@shahova_online/10_dovodov_protiv_legalizatsii_prostitutsii Следующая статья на оче

37🔥21

8 Mar 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,680 views160 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

8 марта 2026 год... Нам, женщинам, до сих пор приходится доказывать, что мы тоже люди, и что мы заслуживаем гуманного отношения к себе. 🔘Нам до сих пор приходится напоминать, что по всему миру происходит фемицид, ведь каждые 10 минут мужчина убивает женщину или девочку. 🔘Нам до сих пор приходится доказывать, что мужчинам нельзя заниматься сексом с детьми и жениться на маленьких девочках, — что всё это является наси

💯6648custom 545390174623132562242😁3😭1

4 Mar 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,730 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🗺 Что я планирую делать дальше 1⃣ Искать работу/проекты. Сейчас это первоочередная задача. Я открыта для предложений в качестве переводчицы. Чтобы обсудить детали, пишите в сообщения канала. 2⃣ Переводить статьи. У меня на очереди 2 статьи, обе о проституции (просто совпало 🍷). 🟡«10 доводов против легализации проституции» (2003) — уже начала переводить, выложу на следующей неделе; 🟡«Легальная проституция — преступ

77custom 545390174623132562218🔥2

24 Feb 2026, 06:10 UTC≈15,600 views164 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

113custom 545390174623132562229🔥21😭1

24 Feb 2026, 06:10 UTC≈9,830 views152 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Книга: Против нашей воли. Мужчины, женщины и изнасилование (1975 г., в списке 100 самых важных книг XX века) Авторка: Сьюзан Браунмиллер, феминистка и журналистка Переводчица: Наталья Шахова Оглавление: 1. Массовая психология изнасилования. Введение 2. В начале был закон 3. Война 3.1. Первая мировая война 3.2. Вторая мировая война 3.3. Бангладеш 3.4. Вьетнам 4. Бунты, погромы и революции 4.1. Америк

🔥9735custom 545390174623132562220

24 Feb 2026, 06:02 UTC≈7,500 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📖 Я закончила переводить книгу Сьюзан Браунмиллер «Против нашей воли. Мужчины, женщины и изнасилование». При переводе мне приходилось разбираться в истории, юриспруденции, социологии, психологии и психиатрии, журналистике, феминизме, политологии, а еще заниматься факт-чекингом, вёрсткой, редактурой и немножко дизайном. Также, для удобства восприятия я перевела футы, мили и дюймы в килограммы, километры и сантиметры

59🔥25custom 545390174623132562213

24 Jan 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,740 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

📖 Против нашей воли. Глава 11. Жертвы и преступления В этой главе: 🔵множество свидетельских показаний; 🔵портрет типичной жертвы изнасилования; 🔵отказ полиции расследовать изнасилования; 🔵неосмотрительность жертвы; 🔵польза сопротивления; 🔵изнасилование как угроза для жизни; 🔵бессмысленность покорного поведения; 🔵разная реакция жертв на изнасилование; 🔵количество ложных заявлений и прочая статистика; 🔵присяжные на сто

35🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shahova_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Библиотека психолога
@psy_b00k · 21,884
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
ПСИХОСОМАТИКА | Екатерина Тур
@dr_ekaterinatur · 24,409
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Smart | Медиа про психологию
@smart_inc_psy · 23,213
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,136
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов
@spb_idpo · 27,586
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
🔵Психологія з МПА🔵
@psy_mpa_ua · 22,285
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог
@psy_professional · 25,759
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Против нашей воли” (@shahova_online), 2,440 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shahova_online.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.