Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+

Channel

Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+

@keksfakt2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

24,179subscribers

-3,140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525643265
TypeChannel
Username@keksfakt2
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/keksfakt2

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,17927,31925,7497 August 2026 — 27,319 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,211 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,110 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,033 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,989 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,917 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,904 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,621 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,755 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,684 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,578 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,559 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,529 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,284 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,278 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,238 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,225 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,224 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,220 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,213 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,201 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,159 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,975 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,275 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,225 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,207 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,156 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,140 subscribers26 September 2026 — 24,964 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,818 subscribers8 October 2026 — 24,411 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,359 subscribers14 October 2026 — 24,336 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,317 subscribers16 October 2026 — 24,299 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,277 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,260 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,266 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,237 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,231 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,229 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,206 subscribers24 October 2026 — 24,179 subscribers7 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net -3,140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,708–27,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 16:4824,179-27
23 Oct 2026, 17:4624,206-23
22 Oct 2026, 20:2724,229-2
21 Oct 2026, 18:4724,231-6
20 Oct 2026, 15:0124,237-29
19 Oct 2026, 13:5624,266+6
18 Oct 2026, 16:4424,260-17
17 Oct 2026, 13:4624,277-22
16 Oct 2026, 16:0824,299-18
15 Oct 2026, 14:1624,317-19
14 Oct 2026, 15:5924,336-23
13 Oct 2026, 04:2124,359-52
8 Oct 2026, 20:4124,411-407
4 Oct 2026, 13:2124,818-146
26 Sept 2026, 03:1624,964-176
17 Sept 2026, 08:1825,140-16
15 Sept 2026, 11:2025,156-51
13 Sept 2026, 18:5825,207-18
12 Sept 2026, 01:1825,225-50
9 Sept 2026, 19:3725,275first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 24,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held62 (23 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total57,280
Reactions total992
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 27s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,468 reactions across 62 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤73721.3%
😁72220.8%
🔥68319.7%
😱39011.2%
💯2306.63%
💘1464.21%
👍1253.60%
😢992.85%
❤‍🔥681.96%
😈671.93%
⚡340.98%
👌330.952%
😍240.692%
🦄220.634%
👏180.519%
🍌160.461%
🤓150.433%
custom 5422566025616988077140.404%
🍓130.375%
🕊80.231%
2 further kinds40.115%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
12.9%
8 of 62 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,820
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,040
over 54 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcppp2F116 September 202616 September 2026
2SDnjdU8X7r122 October 202622 October 2026
2SDnjeYL7KR112 October 202612 October 2026
2VtzqveLe2E125 July 202625 July 2026
2W5zFGPoaG913 August 20263 August 2026
2W5zFHRCr4y122 September 202622 September 2026
2W5zFJa42fT119 October 202619 October 2026
2W5zFK2jojf17 October 20267 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,100 views49 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Решила спросить у чата гпт что я могу дать как женщина своему идеальному мужчине) Рассчитывала на вариант «по еб*лу», но нет 😁 Я - отличная тамада для праздника жизни. Ясно. На самом деле полезно почитать про свои хорошие качества и не вестись на обесценивание женского нематериального вклада в отношения. Но, тем не менее, на вопрос «а ты мне что?» - мы не забываем как надо отвечать, девочки) да и мальчики тоже

🔥26😁10❤8💯5

23 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,240 views15 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

💋 Почему умные женщины иногда творят полную дичь в отношениях? Помните «Отчаянных домохозяек»? Бри из кожи вон лезет, чтобы быть идеальной женой. Линетт контролирует буквально всё. Сьюзан снова выбирает мужчину, с которым всё сложно. Габи получает всё, что хотела, но ей всё равно мало. А Иди цепляется за мужчин, даже когда отношения приносят больше боли, чем удовольствия. И ведь каждая из них неглупая женщина! Та…

❤8🔥5💘2

23 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,250 views37 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🚑 СЕКС ДЛЯ ЗДОРОВЬЯ Недавно вирусилась новость о том, что ученые доказали, что секс лечит насморк. Но есть и другие, не самые очевидные плюшки: 💋 Ученые лечили камни в почках с помощью секса В исследовании участвовали 160 мужчин с камнями в нижней части мочеточника. Одной группе рекомендовали заниматься сексом 2-3 раза в неделю в дополнение к симптоматическому лечению. Другой - воздерживаться от секса и мастурбац…

😁20❤9😱5🔥2👍1

22 Oct 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,470 views29 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdU8X7rVideo

👑 Роскошное пополнение в моей коллекции Кто не знает - я коллекционирую презервативы MAXUS с уникальными принтами, которые мне нравятся. И тут… Оно… 😅 Лимитка с, внимание, ЗОЛОТЫМИ презервативами!!! MAXUS Golden limited edition Ощущается как: 🐕💳💍💍👧 Они реально золотые. Причем не только на упаковке, но и внутри. 🤴 Выглядят роскошно 🤴 На видео я показываю распаковку бокса от MAXUS. Там и супер тонкая серия. И с …

🔥19💘5💯4❤1

22 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,610 views57 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🦶Женщина - мечта футфетишистов Наткнулась на любопытный клинический случай: 55-летняя женщина обратилась к врачам с необычной жалобой: она испытывала непроизвольные оргазмы, исходящие из левой ступни. 😑 Исследователи провели полное неврологическое обследование и предположили, что после повреждения и некорректного восстановления нервных волокон - мозг начал ошибочно интерпретировать некоторые сигналы от ступни как…

😁41🔥7💘5😱4

21 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,830 views31 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🐌 Я - ТОРМОЗ Собственно, так и есть, не поспоришь) Владелица «Катиных секретов» сделала офигенную адаптацию знаменитой методики Института Кинси на определение газа и тормоза в возбуждении. 🗒 Пройти тест можно вот тут На легкость нашего возбуждения влияет, так называемая, система двойного контроля: 🔥Что-то разжигает наш огонёк 🧊Что-то тушит И у каждого человека есть свой такой наборчик факторов газа и тормоза. И…

🔥19❤9😁3

19 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC≈3,000 views24 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJa42fTVideo

Аааахренительный ROMP Pink Peach 🍑 Помните недавно я делала обзор новиночки от Romp в виде светящейся розочки? Так вот, персик не идет ни в какое сравнение. Это абсолютно две разные игрушки. И во виду и по сути. В чем прикол персика: 🍑 Необычный бархатный материал с градиентом 🍑 Зарядка в виде листика персика 🍑 Он ОЧЕНЬ тихий. Не просто тихий, а реально беззвучный!!! При этом, все ощущения технологии «удовольствие…

🔥16❤4😍2❤‍🔥1💘1

19 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,990 views24 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video

🍌Кто чаще всего покупает игрушки в сексшопах? Ответ вы узнаете на видео, но мне стало интересно, а как старшее поколение относится к секс игрушкам? И недавно выкатили опрос среди 3000 американок 60+ и вот результаты: - 46,4% используют секс игрушки про мастурбации почти всегда - 38,7% с партнером в сексе хотя бы иногда - 5,1% используют секс игрушки с партнером почти всегда Причём женщины, которые чаще использовал…

🔥14😁8💘2

16 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC≈3,650 views70 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

❤️‍🩹 Как перестать сходить с ума от ревности? Возвращаю регулярную рубрику ответов на анонимки, пишите свои вопросы в бот @sexologytestbot Ну сперва, сразу оговорюсь, что я НЕ поддерживаю тейк о том, что ревность = неуверенность в себе. Ревность - это встроенная в нас реакция для защиты значимых эмоциональных связей. И младенцы ревнуют. И даже собаки. Что они, не уверенные в себе, получается?) Да, бывает патолог…

🔥30❤14😢10💘8💯4🕊4

16 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,750 views52 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

😆 Самки - мудачки 😆 Недавно в чат прислали прикольное исследование о том, как самцы некоторых птиц «соскуфились» и разучились петь брачные серенады самочкам. И пока я лазила искала подробности - наткнулась на еще несколько любопытных брачных феноменов, где самки ведут себя… мягко скажем… не очень справедливо 😁 Ну разве что осьминогам поделом достается. ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ А с самцами птичек все довольно просто - их никто …

😁32❤11🔥7💯2

15 Oct 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,970 views25 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Готовимся к выступлению 20 октября 💅

🔥25

14 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,710 views29 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

Видео подкаст про презервативы и маркетинг Хочу поделиться ссылкой на классное видео, где меня позвали дать пару комментариев как сексолога. https://youtu.be/rbqo6so1Q-I?is=cFyuZ_IB3ymiVTo3 Забавно, что это видео подкаст сервиса для рассылок, которым я много лет пользовалась как маркетолог) Две моих вселенных схлопнулись 😁

❤21🔥5👍2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @keksfakt2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@keksfakt2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+” (@keksfakt2), 24,179 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keksfakt2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.