Софи Лорен 91. Держится супер.
❤228🔥120👍19😢4

Channel
@neposlednielyudi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,679subscribers
-734 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001796751992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neposlednielyudi |
| Description | Пересуды генералов кинокавалерии и эстрадной пехоты. Про работу в шоу-бизнесе, женскую долю, шутки, шарики-фонарики. Реклама: @neposledniy_chelovek «Крысиный профсоюз»: https://paywall.pw/avdnwkj70m6n Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FtQDm |
| Created | 7 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neposlednielyudi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 57,679 | -62 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 57,741 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 57,742 | -29 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 57,771 | -48 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 57,819 | -81 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 57,900 | -60 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 57,960 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 57,941 | -39 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:14 | 57,980 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 58,000 | -43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 58,043 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 58,054 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 58,063 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 58,081 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 58,084 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 58,114 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 58,124 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 58,144 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 58,142 | -42 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 58,184 | first reading |
316 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 316 (4 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,549,610 |
| Reactions total | 65,030 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 03:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112,547 reactions across 306 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 46,703 | 41.5% | |
| ❤ | 27,884 | 24.8% | |
| 💯 | 13,873 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10,214 | 9.08% | |
| 🤯 | 4,698 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 3,802 | 3.38% | |
| 💔 | 2,646 | 2.35% | |
| 😱 | 1,087 | 0.966% | |
| 😢 | 807 | 0.717% | |
| 🐳 | 243 | 0.216% | |
| ⚡ | 227 | 0.202% | |
| 🤝 | 213 | 0.189% | |
| 👏 | 150 | 0.133% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 315 of the 316 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neposlednielyudi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 316 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjbrQX55 | 1 | 8 August 2026 | 8 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjbukP8f | 1 | 14 September 2026 | 14 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjdGJLhy | 1 | 18 August 2026 | 18 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqx9gAtT | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqxJR7XG | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJz1Yim | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Софи Лорен 91. Держится супер.
❤228🔥120👍19😢4
Бабье лето кончилось, сейчас короткий период осени, и скоро включат отопление. В холода за кожей и волосами совсем другой уход. И если вы следите за своей внешностью круглосуточно, то одного крема или косметолога будет мало. Вам надо спать на шикарном, чтобы шикарно выглядеть. А конкретно на шелковых наволочках Ayris Silk! После сна на их шёлке волосы меньше пушатся и секутся - для меня это весомый аргумент в пользу …
🔥20❤16👍8
Сразу две антинаркотические новости вышли на этой неделе: двадцатисемилетний сын Синди Кроуфорд (нереальный красавчик) умер от передозировки в рехабе и Джиган мается в израильской клинике после того, как на перекрышке стрелял по своей охране в Москве. Параллельно не так давно вышел разговор двух иноагентов: Моргенштерна и Дудя. Где первый, свежий и просветленный, рассказывает о том, как бросил запрещенку и «пришел в…
❤435💯147💔109👍28🔥18👏8😢1
У меня в «Крысином профсоюзе» состоит Оля, девочка-комик с трудной судьбой. Трудная она потому, что однажды ей пришлось дать отпор своему мужу за бесконечное физическое насилие ответным насилием. Нож оказался сильнее человеческой плоти. Оля понесла наказание по закону, живет новую счастливую жизнь с сыном и собаками и выступает в стендапе. Не унывает ни секунды! Я знаю ее еще с тех времен, когда она запустила курс «…
❤164🔥53👏18
Или что менты хату шмонать пришли!
😁213💯28❤9👍1😢1
Встретила в аэропорту пару, которая была одета в футболки «Царь» и «Жена царя» (в комменты кину фотку). Неиронично захотела себе (нам) такие же. Я бы это недоразумение с WB смогла превратить в страшно модные дабл-дресс луки! Удивительно, но эти прикиды я вижу обычно только в аэропорту. И только рядом с гейтами в Турцию или Египет. Сама бы я так рассекала исключительно по европейским бутикам. И пусть только мне бы по…
😁263❤39🐳11💯3🔥1
Я взяла бы это на заметку, если б умела в эксель и знала, что эту табличку хоть раз откроет кто-нибудь, кроме меня. Нравится, что Лерочек задействована в домашних делах меньше Андрея.
😁170❤47💯21🔥9😱9⚡1😢1
Знаете, нам пора пересмотреть свое отношение к парням-девам: они не такие уж перфекционисты и душнилы, какими мы привыкли их видеть. Иногда возьмут и такое исполнят, что диву даешься — никакие стрельцы со скорпионами и рядом не стояли. Вот Герберт Уэллс, например. Создатель «Войны миров» и «Человека-невидимки». От этого отца фантастики меньше всего ожидаешь получить роман о зависимости от партнера, да еще и с истори…
❤117👍29
А что со своим лицом сделала 45-летняя Адриана Лима? Это просто какая-то ювелирная работа косметологов и пластических хирургов! Просто стёрли топ-модели с лица лет 20. Разница с фото 3-летней давности колоссальная. Понятно, что большую роль сыграла и потеря веса после родов. Но скорее всего была проведена либо круговая подтяжка лица, либо эндоскопия верхней и средней трети лица. Плюс ботокс, филлеры и работа с тургор…
❤207🔥142👍17💔4🤯3
«Все уже пользуются нейросетями, а я нет» Скажите: кто-то ещё в детстве мечтал иметь тайного близнеца, чтобы спихивать на него домашку? Потому что сейчас тоже нет-нет да и проскочит такое желание))) Хорошо, что теперь у нас вместо этого близнеца есть нейросети. Это просто спасение, когда на горизонте маячат какие-нибудь таблицы, отчёты, презентации, письма. Вы вообще пробовали считать, сколько мы на всё это тратим …
👍27❤18🔥8😢3🐳1
Рубрика «Двойные стандарты». По интернетам сейчас гуляет история, как парень позвал девушку переехать к нему в квартиру и выставил «прайс-лист на сожительство». 35 тысяч рублей в месяц за жильё, а за пропущенную уборку и немытые сковородки - штраф в 1500 рублей. Свою систему он назвал «осознанным сожительством». Все сразу такие «кококо»! А я смотрю на Чингиза, который раз в месяц по 30к за мою квартплату отдает (зи…
😁293💯56🤯33❤23⚡1
Я моюсь каждый день и стараюсь не вонять. Когда я напиваюсь, то веду себя прилично: не дерусь и ни к кому не пристаю. Могу подкинуть кэша на сигареты, достаточно попросить один раз. Ну два! Этот список можно продолжать бесконечно…
😁254💯72❤27
Showing the 12 most recent of 316 posts we hold for @neposlednielyudi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Идете ли вы на выборы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 232 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не последние люди в городе” (@neposlednielyudi), 57,679 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neposlednielyudi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.