Международный коучинг для работы, бизнеса и жизни
Обучаем с 0 до профи
Гос. лицензия
Выдаем сертификат ICF
Начни с бесплатного курса «5 шагов, как от страха и сомнений перейти к действиям»
→ https://clck.ru/3Nxtjh
РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676d
Created
Between 1 July 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,104–35,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:57
35,236
-32
16 Sept 2026, 03:01
35,268
-12
14 Sept 2026, 11:16
35,280
-6
12 Sept 2026, 18:59
35,286
-14
10 Sept 2026, 17:56
35,300
+6
7 Sept 2026, 18:02
35,294
+131
4 Sept 2026, 18:20
35,163
+3
3 Sept 2026, 00:36
35,160
-10
2 Sept 2026, 00:39
35,170
-16
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
35,186
-13
31 Aug 2026, 00:12
35,199
-14
30 Aug 2026, 02:05
35,213
-7
29 Aug 2026, 01:43
35,220
-25
28 Aug 2026, 00:27
35,245
-8
27 Aug 2026, 03:42
35,253
-15
26 Aug 2026, 00:18
35,268
-18
24 Aug 2026, 22:45
35,286
-19
23 Aug 2026, 07:55
35,305
-14
21 Aug 2026, 19:54
35,319
-9
20 Aug 2026, 19:58
35,328
first reading
Engagement
127 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.19%
avg views ÷ 35,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
418
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 127 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
127 (31 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
29,702
Reactions total
366
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈721
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 45s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
531 reactions across 84 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
225
42.4%
🔥
181
34.1%
👍
79
14.9%
custom 6160968872003373731
18
3.39%
🎉
16
3.01%
👏
12
2.26%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 531 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ЗАКРЫТОЕ ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ДЛЯ СВОИХ
10 мест. Скидка 25% и два курса в подарок
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 🩶 🔺🔺🔺, когда вы можете стать клиентом Юрия Мурадяна на курсе level 2 или получить профессию психолог-консультант совместно с Высшей Школой Экономики.
‼️ЧТО ВЫБЕРЕТЕ ВЫ?
🚩Вместе с НИУ ВШЭ мы набираем группу на профессиональную переподготовку «Психолог-консультант», старт — 15 марта 2027 года.
⚠️Только 10 мест для первых оплативших по ц…
👀 А ТЕПЕРЬ ПОСМОТРИТЕ НА СВОИ ОТВЕТЫ
Мы специально не делали здесь вариантов «правильно / неправильно».
Гораздо интереснее другое:
Куда ваше мышление автоматически направляется первым?
🔹 На привычный способ?
🔹 На новые вводные?
🔹 На поиск фактов?
🔹 На быстрый выход?
🔹 На более широкую картину?
Именно здесь и проявляются разные метанавыки:
🧠 адаптивность
🔎 критическое мышление
🌱 способность учиться на опыте
🎯 ум…
Перед вами сложная проблема. С чего вы чаще начинаете?
🔘 Ищу самое быстрое решение23%
🔘 Разбираю, что вообще влияет на ситуацию42%
🔘 Вспоминаю, как решал(а) похожее раньше6%
🔘 Смотрю, чего мне пока не хватает для решения39%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧠 ПОЧЕМУ МОЖНО ПРЕКРАСНО ЗНАТЬ, КАК НАДО, И ВСЁ РАВНО ДЕЙСТВОВАТЬ ПО-СТАРОМУ?
Можно читать книги.
Проходить обучения.
Сохранять полезные посты.
Даже прекрасно понимать, как было бы лучше поступить.
А потом наступает реальная ситуация — и…
мы снова реагируем привычным способом.
Знакомо? 😄
Потому что между:
«я это знаю»
и
«я умею использовать это, когда ситуация меняется»
есть большая разница.
И здесь становятся…
💜 ОТДЕЛЬНО ОБРАЩАЕМСЯ К СТУДЕНТАМ И ВЫПУСКНИКАМ 5 PRISM
Если вы сейчас учитесь в 5 PRISM или уже завершили обучение, вам тоже важно зарегистрироваться на эфир 1 октября.
Для студентов и выпускников на эфире будет важная информация о дальнейшем профессиональном пути после обучения.
Пока не будем раскрывать подробности 👀
Но если вам знаком вопрос:
«Я уже получил(а) знания и практику. А что дальше?»
— обязательно …
🔥 РАСКРЫВАЕМ, ЧТО МЫ ГОТОВИЛИ 🔥
1 ОКТЯБРЯ в 11:00 мск — «НАВЫКИ НОВОЙ РЕАЛЬНОСТИ 2027»
Как ориентироваться в изменениях, принимать решения и выстраивать свой путь развития — используя метанавыки и мышление?
Сегодня всё меняется слишком быстро, чтобы однажды выучить «правильный алгоритм» и жить по нему годами.
Поэтому всё большую роль играют навыки, которые помогают:
🧠 адаптироваться, когда привычный план больше …
👀 УЖЕ ЗАВТРА МЫ РАССКАЖЕМ, ЧТО ИМЕННО ДЛЯ ВАС ПОДГОТОВИЛИ
Но напоследок хочется признаться в одном.
Когда мы создавали это событие, мы много думали:
что действительно будет вам полезно?
Нам не хотелось делать очередной список:
«Вот навыки, которых вам не хватает».
«Вот что срочно нужно развить».
«Вот каким нужно стать к 2027 году».
Совсем наоборот 💜
Нам хочется помочь вам увидеть, чем вы уже обладаете;
✨ Каки…
💭 И СДЕЛАТЬ НЕБОЛЬШУЮ ПРАКТИКУ.
Мир вряд ли станет медленнее.
Информации становится больше.
Новые технологии и инструменты появляются быстрее.
И именно поэтому всё большую ценность приобретают внутренние навыки:
🧠 гибкость мышления;
🔄 адаптивность;
💬 умение слышать себя и других;
🎯 способность принимать решения;
✨ умение находить новые способы действовать.
Внешние обстоятельства могут меняться. А то, что вы разви…
🧳 СОБИРАЕМ РУЧНУЮ КЛАДЬ В 2027. Выбирайте то, что сейчас откликается больше всего 👇🏼
🔘 Спокойно перестраиваться, когда планы меняются46%
🔘 Принимать решения, даже когда нет полной определённости37%
🔘 Отделять факты от того, что я уже успел(а) додумать37%
🔘 Лучше понимать людей и договариваться20%
🔘 Не застревать в мыслях, а переходить к действиям69%
🔘 Понимать, куда двигаться, когда привычный маршрут больше не подходит51%
The shares total 260%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @academ5prism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Перед вами сложная проблема. С чего вы чаще начинаете?
🔘 Ищу самое быстрое решение23%
🔘 Разбираю, что вообще влияет на ситуацию42%
🔘 Вспоминаю, как решал(а) похожее раньше6%
🔘 Смотрю, чего мне пока не хватает для решения39%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧳 СОБИРАЕМ РУЧНУЮ КЛАДЬ В 2027. Выбирайте то, что сейчас откликается больше всего 👇🏼
🔘 Спокойно перестраиваться, когда планы меняются46%
🔘 Принимать решения, даже когда нет полной определённости37%
🔘 Отделять факты от того, что я уже успел(а) додумать37%
🔘 Лучше понимать людей и договариваться20%
🔘 Не застревать в мыслях, а переходить к действиям69%
🔘 Понимать, куда двигаться, когда привычный маршрут больше не подходит51%
The shares total 260%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔘 Воодушевляет — хочется что-то менять и делать16%
🔘 Уже посмотрел(а) несколько и хочу досмотреть всё16%
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS @formemas · 202,187#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юра Мурадян @ymuradyan · 39,145 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Хакаматон — программы Ирины Хакамада 🈺 @hakamatonproject · 31,034 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Алексей Ситников @drSit · 99,578 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Валера Гут | Ψ и AQ @gutvaleriy · 29,373 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
̶Д̶о̶к̶т̶о̶р̶ Андрей Курпатов @kurpatov_tg · 70,995 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Тата Феодориди @TatFeodoridy · 59,874 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Жизнь и тело с Оксаной @telo_psy · 22,261 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова @myshlenie_kurpatov · 43,168 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Здоровые отношения | Анна Саночкина @sanochkina_anna · 24,967 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект @kintellect · 36,270 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 257,898 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Ксения Мосунова | Зов Рода @zovroda_mosunova · 25,423 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Доктор Курпатов @kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,449 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Психология | Psychologies @PsychologiesRussia · 53,601 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог @psy_professional · 25,680 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Лайфхаки Подсознания @podsoznanie_lebedko · 20,668 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Школа Семейных Отношений Яны Катаевой @yanakataeva · 29,417 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
AI Эксперт: бизнес, агенты, доход @ii_ekspert · 44,422 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MoSHE) @MinistryoSHE · 79,747 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 53,031 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Психолог Марк Бартон @markbarton_mb · 88,659 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Татьяна Демьяненко @prodemyanenko · 35,864 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Елена Новоселова @novoselova_time · 21,673 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка @garikovainsight · 23,823 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5 ПРИЗМ Академия | Коучинг, который меняет жизнь | 5 PRISM” (@academ5prism), 35,236 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academ5prism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.