Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -492. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167,334–167,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:58
167,408
-86
11 Aug 2026, 13:33
167,494
-64
10 Aug 2026, 17:00
167,558
-86
9 Aug 2026, 18:42
167,644
-89
8 Aug 2026, 19:51
167,733
-92
7 Aug 2026, 20:44
167,825
-75
7 Aug 2026, 05:00
167,900
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:59
167,900
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.00%
avg views ÷ 167,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.888%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
25 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
83,520
Reactions total
742
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈179
Links
≈436
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
742 reactions across 25 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
461
62.1%
🔥
157
21.2%
👍
75
10.1%
👏
26
3.50%
🎉
18
2.43%
🥰
3
0.404%
🤔
2
0.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 742reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💜💜 Вы ещё успеваете присоединиться! Встречаемся уже через 2 часа!
⏳ В 19:00 стартует второй эфир челленджа «Управление впечатлением» с Анастасией Калиной — «Как управлять восприятием людей с помощью образа».
Сегодня будем разбираться, как буквально «настраивать» впечатление о себе с помощью одежды:
✨ Как цвет влияет на то, что считывают о вас окружающие
✨ Как выбирать «нужные» цвета под профессию, ситуацию и задач…
Половина августа уже почти позади, но в «ЧУДО КЛУБЕ» впереди ещё столько всего, что ощущение, будто месяц только начинается 🚀
До конца августа нас ждут:
— 1 мастер-класс
— 3 встречи челленджа «Управление впечатлением»
— 2 рисования НейроГрафики
— 1 рисование с Анастасией Анисимовой интегративным подходом 💜
📌 А уже сегодня в 19:00 встречаемся с Анастасией Калиной на практикуме «Как управлять восприятием людей с пом…
Какой самый недооценённый актив есть почти у каждого человека?
Нет, не квартира.
Не машина.
Не накопления.
А навык, который однажды может начать приносить деньги.
Мы постоянно чему-то учимся. Проходим курсы. Получаем сертификаты. Осваиваем новые методики. Но очень часто на этом всё и заканчивается.
Новый навык остаётся просто ещё одной строчкой в списке пройденных обучений. Хотя на самом деле он мог бы стать ис…
Представьте.
Вы просыпаетесь и знаете, что в этом месяце у вас будет не только зарплата. А ещё несколько переводов от людей, которым вы помогли.
И нет, вы не взяли вторую работу.
И нет, вы не работаете без выходных.
Просто однажды вы решили освоить навык, который теперь приносит не только удовольствие, но и дополнительный доход.
Что изменилось бы в вашей жизни?
Может быть, вы бы наконец перестали переживать из-…
📌 Уже сегодня в 19:00 встречаемся с Романом Фадом в «ЧУДО КЛУБЕ»!
Роман поделится частью знаний и практик, которые пришли к нему через пять поколений рода и многолетние путешествия по Африке 🚀
На эфире мы:
✨ За 15 минут пройдём диагностику «Лабиринт» и попробуем увидеть внутренний блок, который сейчас мешает двигаться вперёд в деньгах, карьере и реализации
✨ Разберём 3 уровня внутренних препятствий и почему иног…
Самая дорогая мысль 🙁
Самая дорогая мысль звучит очень просто: «Когда-нибудь потом».
Потом, когда дети подрастут. Потом, когда станет поспокойнее на работе. Потом, когда появится больше сил. Потом, когда закончится ремонт. Потом, когда...
И проходят месяцы.
Потом — годы.
Мы действительно убеждены, что однажды наступит идеальный момент, когда будет больше времени, больше уверенности, больше сил.
Но жизнь устроен…
Не хватает не денег. Не хватает выбора.
Когда кто-то говорит о дополнительном доходе, многие почему-то сразу представляют роскошную жизнь.
Но на самом деле всё гораздо проще.
Дополнительные 30–50 тысяч рублей в месяц — это не обязательно про дорогие сумки, рестораны и путешествия.
Очень часто это про возможность наконец выдохнуть:
— Не откладывать лечение.
— Не переживать, если сломалась стиральная машина.
— Нач…
Как перестать жить от зарплаты до зарплаты
Не в деньгах счастье, но они никогда не бывают лишними.
Люди хотят зарабатывать больше. И не потому, что мечтают о роскошной жизни. А потому, что хочется перестать жить «от зарплаты до зарплаты», начать делать накопления, чувствовать больше спокойствия и иметь возможность выбирать досуг, вкусную еду, приятный отпуск.
Но между этим желанием и первым шагом обычно стоит множ…
Мастер-класс «Печать Силы для успеха в карьере и деньгах» от Романа Фада
Уже в понедельник 10 августа, в 19:00 Роман Фад проведёт мастер-класс, на котором поделится, как найти свои внутренние препятствия за 15 минут, которые мешают достигать цели и как перевести своё намерение в сигнал, понятный подсознанию, обойдя внутреннее сопротивление 🚀
Роман Фад — исследователь шаманских практик, экстрасенс, финалист «Битвы э…
Спасибо за ваши ответы 🙏
Результаты голосования получились интересными: 73% выбрали вариант «больше 100 000 ₽».
И здесь хотим обратить внимание на маленький, но важный нюанс. Мы спрашивали о дополнительной сумме к вашему нынешнему доходу, которой хватило бы, чтобы чувствовать себя спокойнее.
Если ваш сегодняшний доход уже больше 100 000 ₽ и для ощущения финансовой уверенности вам нужна ещё примерно такая же сумма …
Какая дополнительная сумма в месяц заметно изменила бы вашу жизнь?
Выберите, пожалуйста, в опросе ниже сумму, при которой вы перестанете переживать, что денег опять не хватит до конца месяца.
Не для роскошной жизни. А чтобы откладывать, не переживать из-за неожиданных расходов и не ждать зарплату как спасение.
Выберите объективный, по вашим ощущениям, ответ 👇
❤25👍1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @neirografica_formagiclife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько дополнительных денег ежемесячно вам нужно, чтобы чувствовать себя спокойнее?
До 10 000 ₽1%
10 000 — 30 000 ₽1%
30 000 — 50 000 ₽23%
Больше 100 000 ₽75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 820,946 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
ForMagicLife.method @ForMagicLife_method · 15,500 (as read 12 August 2026)#1
Антипсихология || Павел Меренков @merenkovpavel · 40,828#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА @shamilahmadullin · 180,355 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Хитрости хозяюшки @hitrosti_hozyaushki · 419,090 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 August 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 256,480 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Магеря Чистка @mageryachistka · 157,876 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Гимнастика для лица @anyclass_faceonline · 471,249 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Настя Созоник @NASTYASOZONIKK · 184,154 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
Кухня наизнанку @min2ru · 534,932 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики @dr_ales · 471,345 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Татьяна Мужицкая и все-все-все @muzhitskaya · 165,244 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Госуслуги: для родителей @gosuslugiforparents · 678,945 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Эндокринолог Магеря @magerya · 291,039 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Доктор Зубарева / Doctor Zubareva @doctor_zubareva · 407,808 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Семейка ботов @FamilyBots · 704,200 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Masha Blinova. Маша Блинова. Фитнес @mashablinovafit · 278,864 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Центр трансформации и развития личности Анастасии Анисимовой” (@neirografica_formagiclife), 167,408 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neirografica_formagiclife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.