Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for психолог - протестант

Channel

психолог - протестант

@snypsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,667subscribers

+49 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001935729400
TypeChannel
Username@snypsy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/snypsy

Growth

1,6181,6671,642.520 August 2026 — 1,618 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,618 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,634 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,652 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,667 subscribers20 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,611–1,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:591,667+15
31 Aug 2026, 08:241,652+7
28 Aug 2026, 00:561,645+11
24 Aug 2026, 21:451,634+16
20 Aug 2026, 23:151,618no change
20 Aug 2026, 14:301,618first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 1,667 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held16 (7 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total3,480
Reactions total510
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

600 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18731.2%
16627.7%
👍7712.8%
😁599.83%
💯233.83%
😭203.33%
❤‍🔥152.50%
🤝142.33%
🤩122.00%
🥰111.83%
71.17%
🤬40.667%
😘30.5%
custom 545174524315199738220.333%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 16 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snypsy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC114 views28 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не спешите отписываться!! Я надеюсь, никто не поверил что я на серьёзных щах сделаю курс, где ИИ будет писать за вас рилсы, а вы лежите на пляже и считаете клиентов)) Если такое случится, знайте, ваша Полина окончательно ку-ку🤣 Но подозреваю, именно так многие и видят ИИ. Потому что инфоцыгане на этой картинке зарабатывают неплохие деньги)) А правда скучнее. И честнее 👉Потому что ваши мозги никто не отменял. Кон

👍13🔥9😁6

20 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC125 views25 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Запускаю курс по ИИ агентам который будет вести соцсети вместо вас! Курс - Контент завод ИИ достаточно умный, чтобы писать посты, придумывать контент план. Его можно настроить, чтобы весь контент сам выкладывался на все площадки без вашего участия😉 Потому что ИИ все знает, а вы нет! Так что если у вас НЕТ клиентов, НЕТ анализа ЦА, то можно разработать ИИ агента который будет продвигать вас и продавать, нужна толь

10😁8🤬4🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC217 views84 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Что ищет клиент в вашем блоге? Поймете если ответите на вопрос)) - Что нарисовано на купюре в 1000 рублей? Отвечайте прямо сейчас, не задумываясь Ну, вспоминается какой-то мужик, вроде мост, кажется храм... Но что именно за мужик, что за храм и какой это город? Фиг его знает А ведь за каждой купюрой стоит целый замысел: история страны, культура, символ единства, кто-то сидел и выбирал каждую деталь, чтобы был си

🔥47👍17❤‍🔥155

17 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC275 views30 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ищу психолога, которому нужен второй мозг и ещё пара рук)) В 21 веке мы должны быть маркетологом, копирайтером, сммщиком, монтажёром, видеографом, рилсмейкером, продажником, ассистентом, дизайнером... Или всё-таки не должны?)) Я ищу психологов, которым мы с нуля соберём агентов чтобы освободить вас от кучи микрорешений в день Агент, который знает всё про вашу аудиторию и ваши знания, делает за вас карусели, переу

👍13🔥107

16 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC250 views45 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Что я делаю с ИИ и как экономлю время? • не пользуюсь вб и озон, если нужно что то найти или выбрать, отправляю агента искать самый дешевый/подходящий/с быстрой доставкой товар. За июль сэкономила 11к • есть свое приложение календаря со всеми задачами, агент сам вносит все события и задачи и напоминает о них • агенты создают ссылки на консультации, сами отправляют кому нужно и вносят в календарь • дизайн презента

🔥26🤩11👍8

15 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC224 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

А на каком уровне вы дружите с ИИ?

  1. Новичок, просто задаю вопросы GPT или DeepSeek35%
  2. Пользуюсь, но между нами все сложно. GPT или Claude под рукой, а в работе будто и не помогают29%
  3. Мы сработались. Пишу посты и работаю с ИИ быстрее и качественнее32%
  4. Пользуюсь max подпиской на Codex, Claude Code, больше чем чатами и экономлю часы3%
  5. Я вайбкодер, делаю свои сервисы, дизайны и автоматизации2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC232 views36 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Плюс вайб 😁 Недавно сделала полный цикл по созданию каруселей от идеи до дизайна пока тусила с собаками в лесу)) На компе агенты работали, а я им с телефона наговорила задачки и что надо докрутить Естесна не просто - «научись делать карусели на миллион, сам»😅 Когда вернулась домой, все уже было готово)) Вкалывают роботыыыы, а не человек!

🔥1711👍8

14 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC271 views60 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как разозлить Полину? Вот рецепт: скажите, что в терапию нужно ходить 15 лет и вспомнить все события детства, иначе изменений в жизни не будет И прежде чем кидать в меня камнями, как сделали коллеги под одним из моих видео, объясню на примере 👇 1️⃣ Представьте, что банджи-джампинг продвигали бы не весёлыми видео, где люди прыгают, орут и ловят те самые эмоции. А снимали бы только договор: будете бояться и страдать

34💯13😭12🤩1

13 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC282 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Полина, Полина, ко мне клиент пришел с ютуба 🎉🎉🎉 соцсети рулят

🔥19👍13💯10

13 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC297 views50 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Отчёт №3 Записываю дальше. Заметила, что сегодня села снимать без таво, чтобы сначала полчаса себя угаваривать Рилс 55 из 300 Тупые видео всё ещё немнога бесят. Но знаете, я их теперь пишу са смирением Патаму что случилась странная вещь. Эти видео стали набирать 1-2 тысячи прасмотрав. Я стала снимать проще, и в телеграм пришли 60 чилавек и это прям нармальные люди. Те, кто прочитал, падумал и падписался. Реально

23🔥15😁12

12 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC285 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, что бы я без вас делала! Спасибо огромное всем, кто проголосовал и рассудил меня 🙏 В который раз убеждаюсь в простой вещи: если я не знаю, что людям на самом деле интересно и важно — надо просто спросить, а не сидеть и догадываться)) 🥹 И я очень рада, что большинство за действия в реальном времени, а не за папку с уроками, которую открываешь раз в жизни и потом она лежит мертвым грузом, спасибо за честнос

21🔥11🤝8

11 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC277 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Что на самом деле нужно?

  1. Дайте информацию и систему — дальше я сама разберусь и внедрю9%
  2. Ведите меня через действия в реальном времени, так обойду сопротивление91%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @snypsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

А на каком уровне вы дружите с ИИ?

  1. Новичок, просто задаю вопросы GPT или DeepSeek35%
  2. Пользуюсь, но между нами все сложно. GPT или Claude под рукой, а в работе будто и не помогают29%
  3. Мы сработались. Пишу посты и работаю с ИИ быстрее и качественнее32%
  4. Пользуюсь max подпиской на Codex, Claude Code, больше чем чатами и экономлю часы3%
  5. Я вайбкодер, делаю свои сервисы, дизайны и автоматизации2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

Что на самом деле нужно?

  1. Дайте информацию и систему — дальше я сама разберусь и внедрю9%
  2. Ведите меня через действия в реальном времени, так обойду сопротивление91%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психологи Козыревы. ДНК Академия бережного воспитания
@natalkoz_fm · 69,158
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,208
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“психолог - протестант” (@snypsy), 1,667 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snypsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.