Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Менеджер от боженьки

@pm_god

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25,396subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171292376
TypeChannel
Username@pm_god
DescriptionПроджект менеджмент в IT. Пишу про современные деливери практики, продуктовую разработку и как быть классным менеджером. — Сообщество менеджеров: @pm_sovet Реклама: @pm_god_ads 5035224435
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pm_god

Growth

25,39625,42925,412.55 August 2026 — 25,429 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,429 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,404 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,402 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,397 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,398 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,396 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,391–25,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:4425,396-2
11 Aug 2026, 16:5225,398+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:1225,397-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:5325,402-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:3125,404-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:4425,415-7
6 Aug 2026, 16:1325,422-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:0225,429no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:3325,429first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 25,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 March 20265 August 2026)
Views total23,040
Reactions total312
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
5
Links
293

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,222 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁45220.3%
🔥42519.1%
39918.0%
👍34715.6%
💯26612.0%
🤣1727.74%
🤔381.71%
👎371.67%
😭361.62%
130.585%
60.27%
😨60.27%
🤝40.18%
🥴40.18%
❤‍🔥30.135%
🏆30.135%
💩30.135%
🤮30.135%
😢20.09%
🌭10.045%
2 further kinds20.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
15.0%
3 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,630
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,320
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGhZkPT116 July 202616 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,710 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Стоимость владения 10 лет назад я купил свою первую машину – бирюзовый мини купер. До этого у меня был велосипед, который много есть не просил. Новым для меня стало то, что теперь надо тратить ~100$ в месяц на мойку, заправку, масло и т.д. – на велосипеде траты были сильно меньше. С софтом похожая ситуация – тоже иногда нужно доливать масло. Особенно теперь, когда везде АИ. Благодаря АИ делать новое вроде бы быстр

👍50💯3711👎1

21 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈5,990 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Фит по культуре Один мой прошлый босс матерился. Иногда он делал презентацию, рисуя на доске жопу для иллюстрации какой-то мысли (иногда архитектуры). Мне было смешно и понятно, потому что я тоже иногда говорю жопа. Но в глазах некоторых менеджеров был ужас. Кто-то из них потом из компании ушел. Не из-за жопы, конечно, но как-то не прижились, культурой не совпали. Когда нанимаешь человека на работу, важно смотреть,

😁56👍25💯75

16 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC≈6,680 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGhZkPT

#реклама Как не потерять контроль в ИИ-проектах Наверное, каждый уважающий себя менеджер хотя бы раз испытывал это чувство, будто его разжаловали обратно в стажёра. Это происходит, когда на очередном стендапе вся команда обсуждает внедрение новой модели, а он лишь кивает с умным видом и судорожно гуглит каждое второе слово в соседней вкладке. Такой опыт не редкость. Например, менеджер фиксирует сроки релиза, а пот

👍5🥴4😁4🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC≈6,660 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Маленький трюк, чтобы усилить договоренности Когда люди делают что-то своими руками, они больше это ценят. Вот два классных примера, которые иллюстрируют этот эффект. 1️⃣ Эффект IKEA: В исследовании IKEA люди собирали мебель, оригами или фигурки из Lego. После этого они оценивали созданные своими руками объекты существенно выше, чем аналогичные объекты, созданные другими людьми. Когда человек сделал что-то своими

👍7610🔥95🤔4🌭1😁1

7 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈7,560 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сначала сделай просто У всех ПМов есть такой чемоданчик сохраненок: шаблоны оценок, документы со старых работ, просто полезные статьи и видео. Мне пришла идея сделать такой общий мега-чемодан в сообществе ПМ совет, чтобы каждый мог скинуть что-то полезное в общий котел. Тогда мы собрались группой инициативных ребят и стали придумывать, как это реализовать. Сразу всплыла проблема с копирайтом: вдруг будут добавлять

🔥7034👍14😁11

30 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC≈8,420 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Насколько счастливым вы чувствуете себя на работе

  1. Полностью счастлив(-а)!7%
  2. Скорее счастлив(-а)52%
  3. Скорее несчастлив(-а)32%
  4. Совсем несчастлив(-а)9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭2815😢2😨2🫡1

30 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC≈7,370 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Счастье на работе Считаю абсолютно неприемлимым быть несчастным на работе. Я провожу у ИТ-станка 8 часов в день, большую часть жизни. Быть несчастным так долго по собственному желанию лично для меня абсолютно недопустимо. При этом компромиссов, конечно, не избежать. Разные бывают обстоятельства а в жизни, иногда приходится чем-то поступаться. Например, я редко был прям на 100% доволен работой: то продукт скучный,

45💯16😭6👍2👎1

23 Jun 2026, 14:03 UTC≈7,510 views142 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как AI меняет работу менеджера: автономность Один из главных бенефитов AI, которые заметил для себя – стало больше автономности. Раньше: Эй Вася, мы делаем фичу Х, объясни плз, как работает вот этот функционал. Теперь: Эй эйай, мы делаем фичу Х, объясни плз, как работает вот этот функционал. Вот дизайн, спека и техническое описание. Объясни в 10 предложениях, как для тупого. Гораздо больше теперь можно сделат

💯8237😁17🔥6

16 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC≈8,320 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как увеличить объем чаевых на 26% В многих берлинских кафе, когда платишь картой, терминал предлагает оставить чаевые. Обычно есть опции 5% 10%, 15%, 20% и без чаевых. Проблема в том, что это обязательный шаг – пока не тыкнешь в один из вариантов, заплатить нельзя. И делать это нужно при официанте. Бесит максимально! Но работает. Вот ребята, которые делают софт для терминалов, говорят, что с таким UX транзацкий с

😁62👎34👍6😨4🤝31🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC≈8,300 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Фидбек от клиента Однажды я работал с клиентом полгода и был уверен, что он всем очень доволен. Когда аккаунт-менеджер отправил ему фидбек-форму, оказалось что тот доволен примерно на 3 из 5 🙄 Человеку сложно было сказать о своих проблемах явно и четко, так, чтобы даже прямолинейный технарь его услышал. Он говорил общие фразы, вроде it's going OK, а я думал, что все идет отлично. Особо внимательным нужно быть с ам

🔥5935👍21💯8😁4

4 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC≈7,630 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
AdvertisementVideo

#реклама, #рекомендация Сегодня пост про внутренний инструмент студии Heads and Hands, который ребята решили открыть для всех. Это сервис для расшифровки рабочих созвонов — Чатлик. В Zoom и других звонилках есть авто-саммари, но они почти всегда искажают смысл разговора или теряют детали. Илхом (руководитель студии) рассказывал в своем канале, как они искали нормальный сервис, который делает дословную расшифровку.

7👍53🔥3🏆1🤝1

26 May 2026, 13:01 UTC≈7,810 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эстимейты = маркетинг Открою страшную тайну ИТ-проектов. То, что вам обещают сделать за 3 месяца, на самом деле займет 6, а что обещают за 6, займет 26. Все, кто делает оценки, это, конечно, понимают. Оценка нужна не для того, чтобы сделать проект, а для того, чтобы его продать. Ребятам из аутсорса хорошо знакомы эти просьбы сейлов: “16 месяцев клиент не купит. Давайте сделаем что-нибудь за 9”. А после 9-ого, к

👍70🔥2919💯11👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pm_god. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,430 voters approx.

Насколько счастливым вы чувствуете себя на работе

  1. Полностью счастлив(-а)!7%
  2. Скорее счастлив(-а)52%
  3. Скорее несчастлив(-а)32%
  4. Совсем несчастлив(-а)9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 78,535 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Менеджер от боженьки” (@pm_god), 25,396 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pm_god.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.