Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hard Client

Channel

Hard Client

@hardclient

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,912subscribers

+147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653712707
TypeChannel
Username@hardclient
DescriptionСтанислав Хрусталёв • Пишу о Customer Experience • Собираю лучшие CX практики • Оцениваю клиентские пути hardclient.com По всем вопросам: @stan_khrustalev Канал в реестре РКН: clck.ru/3Eq6rt
Created16 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hardclient

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,76522,92522,8456 August 2026 — 22,765 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,768 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,770 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,773 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,784 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,793 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,796 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,813 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,831 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,845 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,849 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,848 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,843 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,844 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,838 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,840 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,845 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,855 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,857 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,856 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,867 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,861 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,872 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,883 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,899 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,896 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,893 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,902 subscribers25 September 2026 — 22,892 subscribers3 October 2026 — 22,919 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,918 subscribers12 October 2026 — 22,912 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,906 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,902 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,894 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,888 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,887 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,878 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,871 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,867 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,868 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,867 subscribers27 October 2026 — 22,873 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,884 subscribers29 October 2026 — 22,893 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,892 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,893 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,894 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,895 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,898 subscribers4 November 2026 — 22,901 subscribers5 November 2026 — 22,897 subscribers6 November 2026 — 22,905 subscribers7 November 2026 — 22,914 subscribers8 November 2026 — 22,925 subscribers10 November 2026 — 22,912 subscribers22,9126 August 202610 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 96 days, net +147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,741–22,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:1122,912-13
8 Nov 2026, 19:4822,925+11
7 Nov 2026, 09:5622,914+9
6 Nov 2026, 11:3022,905+8
5 Nov 2026, 09:1722,897-4
4 Nov 2026, 09:5822,901+3
3 Nov 2026, 10:2922,898+3
2 Nov 2026, 12:0122,895+1
1 Nov 2026, 10:0622,894+1
31 Oct 2026, 06:5522,893+1
30 Oct 2026, 06:5122,892-1
29 Oct 2026, 10:1622,893+9
28 Oct 2026, 05:5922,884+11
27 Oct 2026, 02:5522,873+6
24 Oct 2026, 20:1022,867-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:1822,868+1
22 Oct 2026, 17:2822,867-4
21 Oct 2026, 13:1922,871-7
20 Oct 2026, 13:0522,878-9
18 Oct 2026, 09:1022,887first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 22,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,530
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held58 (24 April 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total84,920
Reactions total1,939
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
192
Videos
4
Links
193

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,542 reactions across 58 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,64230.9%
🔥2,42028.3%
💩1,19314.0%
👍96911.3%
✍2202.58%
😁1782.08%
❤‍🔥1621.90%
🥴1271.49%
🤝1211.42%
🤔670.784%
💯550.644%
👏520.609%
👎500.585%
👌470.55%
🥰420.492%
🆒380.445%
🫡280.328%
🍾180.211%
🤬150.176%
🌚110.129%
27 further kinds871.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,542 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 58 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hardclient. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.17%
3 of 58 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,120
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,420
over 55 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqv3r3HQ16 November 20266 November 2026
2W5zFG3cgob113 August 202613 August 2026
2W5zFGDY6iD122 September 202622 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,060 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Рив Гош» с апреля дарит клиентам бонусы ко дню рождения заранее. Раньше их начисляли только за покупку в праздничные дни. Заодно любимых категорий стало до пяти вместо одной. Как еще компании удерживают покупателя, который сравнивает цены и акции перед покупкой? В прямом эфире «Рив Гош», «Азбука Вкуса» и Inventive Retail Group расскажут, что поменяли в программах лояльности и зачем. Заодно поговорят о том, чем уд…

❤20👍13🔥10✍2🆒2🤝1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

10 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC≈3,360 views218 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 488 • Дожим vs. забота Сегодня представляю вашему вниманию кейс, который может вызвать разные чувства у аудитории. Бывает так, что мы тянем с покупкой: то переходим к оформлению заказа, то возвращаемся обратно, чтобы что-то проверить. То вспоминаем о начатом чекауте, то снова решаем посмотреть, а нет ли лучших альтернатив. А тем временем «часики тикают», и товар, который мы отложили, просто могут раскупить. Поэ…

💩91❤70🔥33👍13🤔8✍1👏1💯1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

9 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈4,310 views135 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 487 • Подпишись на цикл Бывает так, что зацепила вас книга, спонтанно купленная в магазине, и вы узнаёте, что это лишь часть большой истории, по которой есть и другие книги. То, что уже выпущено, можно легко докупить. А вот с книгами, которые еще не вышли в свет, сложнее: круговорот дел, заботы, хлопоты – и вот вы пропустили выпуск новой книги, которую ждали. Читай-Город 😊 тоже не хотел бы, чтобы вы пропускали н…

❤61🔥36👍20❤‍🔥15💯2🆒1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

6 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC≈5,610 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzqv3r3HQ

Раз в пару недель в твиттере вирусится очередная система, которая «всё сама»: придумывает идею, запускает, продвигает, монетизирует. Тысячи репостов, все сохраняют в закладки. Автор канала Короче, капитан знает человек 20, которые честно пытались собрать что-то такое. Денег это не принесло ни одному. Нейросети тут ни при чём, они правда стали сильными. Сайт или бота сейчас можно собрать за выходные. Но большинство …

❤18🔥14👍8✍7🤝2🙊2❤‍🔥1👎1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

5 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC≈6,300 views154 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 486 • Заказывают повторно Как подсветить социальное доказательство того, что продукт хорош? Показать рейтинг – база. Вывести в карточку товара полезный отзыв – встречается, но реже. Показать, сколько раз купили или добавили в избранное – еще реже. А вот в индийском сервисе Zomato (агрегатор доставки еды) решили использовать нестандартную механику: Если ты заказал себе пиццу, помимо оценок, что является индикатор…

🔥78❤36👍23✍13🎄2💯1🆒1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

29 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC≈7,080 views165 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 485 • От клавиш – к голосу Сейчас, как грибы после дождя, появляются разные сервисы, которые позволяют надиктовывать, а не печатать текст, после чего ИИ-начинка превращает кашу из слов в корректные предложения, с пунктуацией и параграфами. Разумеется, движут всем этим трендом как желание повысить свою эффективность, так и банальная лень. Вот и в 😊 Wildberries теперь позволяют как напечатать отзыв по-старинке, та…

🔥83💩52👍16✍8❤‍🔥2👌2🤔2

Signed Stan Khrustalev

27 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈7,110 views205 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 484 • Спасибо! Когда вы написали развернутый отзыв по купленному товару и поделились им с другими клиентами, подсознательно хочется какого-то признания: чтобы это не была «работа в стол», а кому-то ваш отзыв помог. Но в эпоху соц.сетей возникает такое ощущение, что обычные лайки теряют какую-то ценность и становятся своего рода commodity: «ну 5 лайков, ну 10... Ну есть – и есть...» Поэтому в Lamoda решили замени…

❤112🔥46❤‍🔥22🥰11👍10✍2💯2

Signed Stan Khrustalev

20 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈8,220 views340 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 483 • Экономишь? Доплати! Тут прошла новость (первоисточник) о том, что Самокат тестирует таки интересную фичу: если вы не хотите добирать лишние продукты до минимальной суммы заказа – доплатите «сумму малую» и не добирайте 🎅 C одной стороны, понятна логика компании: сервис не может работать в убыток, гоняя курьера на 1 бутылки молока, а потребность клиентов в том, чтобы не добирать лишнее, видимо тоже есть. В ит…

💩170🔥101❤25👍16😁16🥴9🤔1🤣1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

19 Oct 2026, 08:45 UTC≈7,510 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Продажи видят заказ. Маркетинг — реакцию на рассылки. Сервис — обращения в поддержку. Но полной картины не видит никто... Только 23% компаний выстраивают единый клиентский опыт во всех каналах. Остальные 77% теряют время, деньги и лояльность покупателей на стыках разных сервисов ☝️ 29 октября RetailCRM проводит закрытый ивент — на нём ведущие эксперты екома расскажут, как объединить продажи, маркетинг и сервис в е…

❤24🔥20👍12🤝8✍3🆒1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

16 Oct 2026, 08:45 UTC≈8,030 views105 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Я тут задумался: вот всё, что мы обсуждаем с вами на этом канале – фичи, улучшение пользовательского опыта, интересные решения в UI – это всё про людей А тем временем друг (Макс, привет тебе🎅) уже делится тем, как попросил агента составить низкокалорийный и здоровый рацион – и тот потопал проектировать состав блюд и собирать корзину продуктов в одном из сервисов Возникает вопрос: кому мы будем продавать в ближайше…

❤38👍26🔥20🤔9👎5✍2🆒2❤‍🔥1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

15 Oct 2026, 14:03 UTC≈8,340 views176 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⠀ 482 • Паспорт хвостика Взять котика с улицы – дело благое: спасёте от тяжелой и голодной жизни в подвале. Да и добавите +100 к уюту в доме. Но когда вы погрузитесь в детали такой заботы, голова может пойти кругом. Ведь нужно делать защиту от блох, гельминтов, ставить разные вакцины, чтобы потом не пришлось тратиться на лечение, выбирать особые корма, если что-то не так со здоровьем, т.д. А еще помнить обо всём …

❤87🔥49🥰18👍15❤‍🔥4💯2💅1

Signed Stan Khrustalev

14 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈8,110 views192 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Из года в год ограничений вокруг нас становится всё больше. Понятно, что восторга это ни у кого не вызывает Но одно дело — сам запрет, а другое — как его подать. Грамотная коммуникация способна сильно сгладить негатив Просто посмотрите, как, потратив немного времени на текст, можно по-человечески объяснить причину ограничения и призвать к пониманию Эх, почаще бы встречались такие кейсы😊 @vkzkv, спасибо, что подел…

❤87🔥53❤‍🔥21💯14👍9✍6🆒2

Signed Stan Khrustalev

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @hardclient. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @hardclient as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
38 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Фича дня by @hardclient
@featureoftheday · 12,237
#1
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,403
#2
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,007
#3
Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps
@b_goncharenko · 15,155
#4
Про удобство (Михаил Греков)
@proudobstvo · 18,308
#5
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,224
#6
Плавучая редакция
@editboat · 12,546
#7
Конаков Артём, UXART
@konakov_blog · 6,336
#8
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,719
#9
Марфицин
@writingtools · 8,395
#10
Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт
@designvorkel · 10,057
#11
UI-UX фэйл
@uifail · 14,524
#12
Ameton про e-com в фудтехе
@ametonfoodtech · 3,580
#13
Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор
@ilyaskopin · 9,981
#14
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,198
#15
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,396
#16
No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,615
#17
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева
@vladimir_merkushev · 21,822
#18
PostPostResearch: Константин Ефимов и Анастасия Жичкина
@postpostresearch · 12,554
#19
Черезнемогу / Надя Здорова
@chereznemogy · 4,829
#20
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,097
#21
Глеб Кудрявцев — продукты и бизнес
@glebkudr · 17,251
#22
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,877
#23
Alexcouncil⚡
@alexcouncil · 13,507
#24
UX Lead 🐤
@uxlead · 3,460
#25
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах
@blackproduct · 21,248
#26
Находки Crauch
@crauchru · 5,900
#27
Камилла Самохина Ӏ Product channel fit
@product_channel_fit · 15,768
#28
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,494
#29
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,282
#30
Product games с Кристиной Гусевой
@productgames · 10,185
#31
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,965
#32
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,637
#33
Strategic move | Юлия Билинкис
@strategic_move · 16,806
#34
Roots
@rootsproduct · 6,559
#35
Золотые пуши
@goldpush · 14,156
#36
Путь продакта с Романом Абрамовым
@PMlifestyle · 7,733
#37
Derkach is creating...
@DesignCraftsPeople · 1,107
#38
El Danielle / Даниил Видишев
@eldanielleee · 3,527
#39
Product Developer
@product_developer · 11,936
#40
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#41
Сергей Колганов - psilonsk - об управлении проектами
@psilonsk · 15,731
#42
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,300
#43
Дашич, беги🚀
@dashich_begi · 41,038
#44
Продукты, книги и любовь
@product_love · 14,031
#45
Это Лёша
@itslyoshatg · 3,064
#46
Из коммерса в е-коммерса
@hikollegi · 55,280
#47
Векк
@desiqn · 3,776
#48
Фанат Сервиса
@fanat_servisa · 16,529
#49
Цифровые экосистемы
@heads_ecosystem · 9,109
#50
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 62,560
#51
Олег Александров
@olegschanel · 5,088
#52
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 44,082
#53
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,037
#54
Odokienko | Design Twist
@designtwist · 3,259
#55
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,540
#56
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,144
#57
Трудно быть Руденко
@cxlogic · 9,003
#58
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
#59
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,314
#60
Ozøn Design
@ozondesign · 17,850
#61
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,488
#62
Продуктовошная Михаила Грекова
@suda_smotri · 6,030
#63
Local Talent | Design
@local_talent · 9,098
#64
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,102
#65
Рефы, привет
@refs_hi · 9,579
#66
Мамкин Дизайнер
@uxrdsgn · 8,355
#67
Оди
@awdee · 33,195
#68
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,025
#69
Design Board
@DesignBoard · 9,370
#70
Как это сверстано
@kaketosverstano · 8,301
#71
Wannabe like Rozov
@wannabelikerozov17feb · 16,017
#72
Product design · Студия «Луч»
@uxfail · 13,171
#73
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,165
#74
Любовь, дизайн и метрики
@designavito · 10,389
#75
дизайнерс.приложения
@cyryllicapps · 4,629
#76
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,412
#77
Миша Наер
@mikhailnaer · 8,250
#78
Дизайн-комьюнити
@sortofdesign · 12,479
#79
GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,379
#80
Аня Подображных [Будни продакта]
@product_weekdays · 18,967
#81
Дизайн тащит
@design_awesome · 9,569
#82
Product Management & AI
@ruspm · 25,014
#83
Дизайн Домашка
@designdomashka · 11,806
#84
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,834
#85
#ФФДД2Д
@ffdd2d · 8,929
#86
UX Digest ⭕️
@uxdigest · 3,773
#87
Хороший интерфейс
@goodux · 7,039
#88
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 25,046
#89
Сдоба
@konturuxsdoba · 3,624
#90
Канал Ильи Бирмана
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,097
#91
чтобы что?
@cxuxcx · 1,070
#92
Digital Review
@digital_review · 13,945
#93
Лагута Лагута
@lagutalaguta · 7,429
#94
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,864
#95
Бенчмарки
@benchmarkee · 4,797
#96
Жизнь, привет
@life_privet · 223
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,224
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,719
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,007
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,403
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,037
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,965
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,025
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,877
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах
@blackproduct · 21,248
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева
@vladimir_merkushev · 21,822
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,314
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,488
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 25,046
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,195
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hard Client” (@hardclient), 22,912 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hardclient.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.