Channel
@scrummasters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,661subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001399617066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scrummasters |
| Created | 27 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scrummasters |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 1,661 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 1,662 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 1,661 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 1,661 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2020 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Consuming information Fast and Slow…. After working extensively with AI agents over the past two weeks, I've noticed two patterns for consuming and dealing with information. The first is “fast”, to just bridge some knowledge gaps; the second is “slow”, to allow my brain to rewire. When I need a specific, real-time answer to clarify a detail, resolve an issue, or gain a high-level overview, I ask AI to summarise an…
🤔2
We might soon need a 'gym for the brain' with mathematical problems to solve, just to keep our brains from fully atrophying.
🤔4
Uncle Bob confirms.
Surprisingly, the Agile principle of 'customer collaboration over contract negotiation' applies perfectly to interacting with AI agents. They may miss details in the initial specification, but the ongoing conversation drives the necessary fixes.
🤔1
“AGI is the ability to figure things out.” “A human who can figure things out has some baseline knowledge, the ability to reason over that knowledge, and the ability to iterate their way to the answer. An AI that can figure things out has some baseline knowledge (pre-training), the ability to reason over that knowledge (inference-time compute), and the ability to iterate its way to the answer (long-horizon agents).…
AGI is born! Truly it is born! Optus 4.5 is a breakthrough. Just today, I completed two tasks that would otherwise take me a couple of days: 1. Created detailed requirements for a product feature (M size). 2.Analyzed text transcripts of 30 customer calls, detailing use cases, major questions, and objections. And that’s just the beginning. In 4-6 months, there will be another model. What are we all going to do wit…
The mismatch between "corporate propaganda" and reality is astonishing. All companies claim that their people are their most valuable asset. Yet, when the time comes to trim the budget, employees are the first item slashed to keep costs low. What’s worse is that this behavior is pre-determined by a glitch in modern accounting: under current rules, employees are classified as expenses to be minimized rather than ass…
🤔1
Curiosity is becoming one of the most valuable skills. This is what differentiates us from AI.
Product teams will prevail.
Привет! В глубинах YouTube наткнулся на фантастический курс о сложном мире от Георгия Сатарова. Кроссдисциплинарность зашкаливает: физика, математика, информатика, биология, нейробиология, астрономия, социология, политология, психология. И все это про хаос, эфолюцию и способы развития в рамках постоянно меняющейся среды (aka институты хаоса). Три наиболее интересных тезиса: 1. Хаос и порядок порождают друг друга. Г…
К слову об узкой специализации и оптимизации времени разработчиков… Если ваш продукт похож на пиджак из прикрепленного видео, то в первую очередь вопросы нужно адресовать не разработчикам (портным), а менеджерам, которые создали систему выпускающую продукты такого качества. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wxL3DYen5g
Вот и сама статья (эксклюзив для подписчиков канала 😉). Отдельно рекомендую изучить список литературы: там много интересных и глубоких работ по организационному дизайну.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scrummasters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Количество выполненных сторипоинтов в спринт характеризует производительность Scrum команды
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2020 to 18 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mindscapes & Metalogues” (@scrummasters), 1,661 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scrummasters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.