Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chief Philosophy Officer

Channel

Chief Philosophy Officer

@chief_philosophy_officer

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,738subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378238901
TypeChannel
Username@chief_philosophy_officer
DescriptionФилософия бизнеса и предпринимательства: деконструируем бизнес-ритуалы, выясняем когда стратсессия становится карго-культом, продукт свалкой фич, а мышление управленца заменяется выбором очередного модного фреймворка. Консультации @andrei_morozov
Created14 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chief_philosophy_officer

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7386,8006,7696 August 2026 — 6,800 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,800 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,785 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,782 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,787 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,780 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,779 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,781 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,767 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,765 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,764 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,762 subscribers24 September 2026 — 6,756 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,749 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,767 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,766 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,771 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,770 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,764 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,754 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,751 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,738 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,729–6,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 03:066,738-13
4 Nov 2026, 04:316,751-3
1 Nov 2026, 05:416,754-1
29 Oct 2026, 08:566,755-9
25 Oct 2026, 21:376,764-6
19 Oct 2026, 17:296,770-1
17 Oct 2026, 04:076,771+5
14 Oct 2026, 11:376,766-1
10 Oct 2026, 13:416,767+18
4 Oct 2026, 17:196,749-7
24 Sept 2026, 21:176,756-6
17 Sept 2026, 01:416,762-2
12 Sept 2026, 16:186,764-1
2 Sept 2026, 20:146,765-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:576,767-14
28 Aug 2026, 03:356,781+2
25 Aug 2026, 10:336,779-1
22 Aug 2026, 02:486,780-7
18 Aug 2026, 17:546,787+5
15 Aug 2026, 18:286,782first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
1
Links
95

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

881 reactions across 28 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤29333.3%
👍20122.8%
🔥18020.4%
💯505.68%
👏434.88%
😁313.52%
✍283.18%
😢111.25%
🗿101.14%
🤯70.795%
🤡60.681%
🤔50.568%
custom 540487043393992290830.341%
👎20.227%
😱20.227%
🤝20.227%
🐳10.114%
👾10.114%
💩10.114%
😍10.114%
3 further kinds30.341%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 953 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 30 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chief_philosophy_officer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,010 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В предверии конференции от философского клуба quercus и по их же просьбе, надиктовал пару слово о профессии "корпоративный философ" https://www.mn.ru/smart/korporativnyj-filosof-put-ot-fasadnoj-etiki-k-konczeptualnomu-debagingu

❤7👏4👍3🔥1🤔1

26 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,030 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В железной неподвижности восседали мы на высоких табуретах у стойки, вокруг нас плескалась музыка, и бытие было светлым и мощным; оно наполняло нас новой силой.

❤6👏4👍1🤡1

26 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,310 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @tfeatPhoto

73. Joker 2026: Мир меняется, конференция тоже YouTube В гостях продюсер JUG Ru Group Алексей Фёдоров и корпоративный философ Андрей Морозов. Говорим о том, что останется человеку, когда модели научатся залезать в самые сложные «кишочки»: зачем нужны метафоры и коммуникация, как воспринимать LLM как нового участника команды, почему стоит смешивать модели и где проходит граница нашей субъектности. А ещё обсуждаем …

❤6👍2👏1

21 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC≈2,910 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

В смутные времена одни люди банки с водой заряжают, другие смыслы ищут. Первым делом можно и дома в одиночестве заняться, для второго все таки лучше найти кого-то еще. 8-10 октября мои друзья из философского клуба Quercus проводят конференцию Я тоже там буду что-то вещать, что-то модерировать. Приходите в общем.

❤7👍4🔥3✍1👏1

19 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,820 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Павел Щелин. Кризис смыслов В гостях у продюсера Алексея Федорова и корпоративного философа Андрея Морозова — политический философ Павел Щелин. О чём поговорили: – Зачем айтишникам философия – Кого усилит ИИ и что будет с остальными – Почему массовое образование больше не справляется – Чем мастер отличается от узкого специалиста – Почему нейросеть не бывает нейтральной – Во что верят создатели ИИ: Альтман, Тиль и К…

❤11👍3🔥3👏2😁1

28 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈3,670 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Намедни на стриме у Семена поныл о том, что люди в бизнесе не умеют думать, а люди на кафедрах соображать. И да, у Семена скоро стартует отличный курс по современной философии. Соображайте.

❤8✍6🤡3😁3💯2👍1👏1

20 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈3,860 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @devspotting

#ГриненкоПро №22: философия, мышление и LLM, с корпоративным философом Андреем Морозовым Помните, еще недавно все хотели войти в IT, а потом в IT вошли нейронки? Теперь главные ИИ-лаборатории нанимают философов. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WswHn_mJo8I Так что я поговорил с философом Андреем Морозовым, автором канала @chief_philosophy_officer и продюсером конференции Joker: — Чем мышление отличается от знания б…

❤10👍8🔥2✍1👏1🤯1

19 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈3,450 views52 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Как LLM забирает у нас способ думать Ребёнок сначала произносит ма-ма-ма просто потому, что это самые простые для его рта звуки. Смысла в них ещё нет. Смысл появляется потом, когда на этот звук приходят, берут на руки, кормят, и постепенно вокруг случайного слога нарастает значение: мама. Во взрослой жизни по большому счёту ничего не меняется. В большинстве случаев мы делаем, а потом в сделанном обнаруживаем, что и…

❤25🔥8👍7💯7👏2✍1👎1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈3,420 views36 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @leadsnotes

Зачем менеджеру думать о смысле сказанного и причём тут философия Приготовьтесь, сейчас грузить буду. Когда я еще учился на мехмате, иногда встречался на студенческих тусовках со студентами филологических и философских факультетов. Мне тогда казалось, что они занимаются чем-то...ну, мягко скажем, странным. То есть, поспорить в 4 утра на кухне о том, работает ли их философия и что вообще значит "работает", и надо л…

👍20🔥10❤4🐳1👏1

6 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈2,860 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В эту пятницу стрим про управление в бизнесе. Но не мой, я приду в гости к leadsnotes и буду вещать про философию менеджмента, приносите свои вопросы или подключайтесь, просто слушайте как радио в дороге домой.

❤3👍2🔥2👏1

20 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC≈7,730 views85 reactions5 Starsread 7 November 2026

Про утопию «люди думают, а роботы работают», или про то, как корпорации пытаются вернуть вотерфолл Сегодня роботы берут на себя всё больше работы. Реализация, которая ещё вчера стоила много недель работы высокооплачиваемых специалистов, теперь занимает минуты и почти ничего не стоит. И кажется, что ещё чуть-чуть и мы придём к идеалу, о котором мечтают многие: человек думает, а машина реализует. Но вот в чём дело, п…

🔥36❤16💯13👍8👏6✍3🤯2👎1

9 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈9,490 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026

AI-first компании как новый карго-культ Допустим, некий предприниматель придумал идею бизнеса, сформулировал ценность. Чтобы воплотить её в реальном мире, он идёт на «рынок» готовых форм: ищет людей уже существующих профессий, собирает оргструктуру из известных вариантов (или нанимает CEO, который соберёт её за него), нанимает консультантов с их фреймворками, покупает CRM, ERP и прочие коробки, которые неявно предла…

❤19👍6✍2👏2🔥2💯1🤔1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @chief_philosophy_officer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд
@leadgr · 30,196
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,733
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 25,894
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 22,565
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,049
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 34,269
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты
@dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 35,303
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
I’m CTO, bitch
@ctobtch · 20,252
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV
@pmdaily · 23,650
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
pmclub — учим управлять
@pmclub · 20,708
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Системный Аналитик
@sys_sa · 19,103
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова
@proProject1 · 40,266
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chief Philosophy Officer” (@chief_philosophy_officer), 6,738 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chief_philosophy_officer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.