Про управление людьми, построение команд, работу с мотивацией, смыслами и айтишечкой в этом вашем крупном интерпрайзе и не только в нем
Chat @bvevvsbackstage
Сайт https://безвотэтоговотвсего.рф
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,559–7,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 19:59
7,680
-3
4 Nov 2026, 16:35
7,683
-2
1 Nov 2026, 08:50
7,685
+5
29 Oct 2026, 13:45
7,680
-8
26 Oct 2026, 20:30
7,688
-1
23 Oct 2026, 15:35
7,689
-2
15 Oct 2026, 01:37
7,691
+11
12 Oct 2026, 02:01
7,680
+14
5 Oct 2026, 09:54
7,666
+23
27 Sept 2026, 08:38
7,643
+45
17 Sept 2026, 20:39
7,598
+1
13 Sept 2026, 18:41
7,597
+3
10 Sept 2026, 09:58
7,594
+18
31 Aug 2026, 23:45
7,576
-9
29 Aug 2026, 07:15
7,585
+1
26 Aug 2026, 16:53
7,584
-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:45
7,588
-8
20 Aug 2026, 07:15
7,596
+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:12
7,595
-3
14 Aug 2026, 00:08
7,598
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 7,680 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
58 (25 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
45,142
Reactions total
1,245
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
668
Videos
35
Links
487
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,077 reactions across 55 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,292
42.0%
🔥
842
27.4%
👍
506
16.4%
💯
170
5.52%
🤣
51
1.66%
😁
47
1.53%
❤🔥
34
1.10%
🍾
34
1.10%
🎉
32
1.04%
👏
13
0.422%
⚡
11
0.357%
👀
5
0.162%
🦄
5
0.162%
👎
4
0.13%
🤔
4
0.13%
🥰
4
0.13%
🕊
3
0.097%
🙈
3
0.097%
🥴
3
0.097%
🆒
2
0.065%
10 further kinds
12
0.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,077 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 55 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bvevvs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (18.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дружочки!
Уже совсем скоро встретимся с вами на 16-м завтраке #безвотэтоговотсего, чтобы поговорить о непростой, но очень актуальной управленческой задаче — как работать с сильными специалистами, которые не особенно нуждаются в руководстве.
Казалось бы, что может быть проще: собрал вокруг себя талантливых людей, поставил общую цель — и наслаждайся результатом. Но на практике всё немного сложнее. У каждого своё мнен…
Ты хоть понял, что тебе ответили?
У меня есть подозрение, что в ближайшие годы нам придётся выработать какую-то "этику" использования LLM. Причём помимо конфиденциальности, авторских прав и повсеместных галлюнов, меня интересует ещё одна проблема: соответствие компетенций человека сложности результата, который он получает от нейросети.
Допустим, я пишу своему любимому пирожочку (у меня это ChatGPT): «Пирожок, хоч…
Я тебе ничего не говорил
Дружочки, на прошлой неделе мы предложили вам довольно управленческую дилемму. На закрытой встрече ты узнаёшь, что через месяц твоего хорошего знакомого и коллегу уволят. Решение принято, информация конфиденциальная. А человек тем временем строит планы на следующий год, обсуждает ипотеку и вообще в ус не дует.
Проголосовали 454 человека, и результаты, на мой вкус, получились любопытнее самой…
Как UPS переизобрела себя
Дорогая редакция наконец-то возвращается из Флориды домой, а мы в субботней рубрике #сережазаваспочитал изучаем классный кейс, в котором историк Марк Левинсон разбирает, как Джим Кейси сумел сменить бизнес-модель компании UPS, сохранив старый бизнес.
В 1907 году Джим Кейси основал в подвале сиэтлского салуна небольшую службу доставки телеграмм и посылок на велосипедах. К моменту его смерти…
Have a magical day!
За две недели путешествия по Флориде я успел получить примерно миллион пожеланий прекрасного дня, великолепного вечера и незабываемых впечатлений. Ну вот просто все с тобой найс, френдли и вери вери полайт. Сразу дисклеймер: США - одна из моих любимых стран для путешествий, был тут раз десять и всем с удовольствием рекомендую.
Каждый раз замечаю интересную культурную разницу. В Америке базовая на…
Книга “Управление #безвотэтоговотвсего в продаже!”
Ну что, држочки, ура, получается. Вообще, сразу скажу, идея написать книгу пришла как реакция на запрос, он был очень понятным, мол, Сереж, посты это хорошо, но задолбаешься в канале искать что-то конкретное, структуры бы добавить. Этот простой и понятный запрос и стал финальным триггером. Книга стала не просто сборником постов, это структурированное размышление о …
Завтраки возвращаются!
Сильные люди обычно хорошо знают, что делают, имеют собственное мнение и не очень нуждаются в том, чтобы им ежедневно объясняли, как работать. Именно за это мы их и ценим, любим и уважаем. Но у руководителя остаются задачи, сроки и ответственность за общий результат, а несколько сильных специалистов ещё не обязательно становятся сильной командой. Особенно когда у каждого своё представление о т…
Стратегия, в которую поверили
Дорогая редакция нашего канала продолжает колесить по Флориде, а в это время, как раз для субботней рубрики #сережазаваспочитал в Harvard Business Review вышло исследование о том, почему стратегия иногда никого особенно не вдохновляет.
Руководители согласовали новое направление, определили приоритеты, подготовили коммуникации, но дальше презентаций дело движется с трудом. Авторы считаю…
Дружочки, мы с вами уже совсем скоро встретимся на нашей встрече, чтобы обсудить одну из самых горячих тем 2026 года — оргдизайн в эпоху ИИ
За последние 10–15 лет крупные компании выстроили привычную систему организации разработки и продуктовых команд. Кросс-функциональность, аджайлы, развитие e-commerce и продуктовый подход — всё это стало частью устоявшейся модели. Но ИИ постепенно меняет правила игры, и теперь са…
От сарказма до коллективного мудачества
Я вообще большой поклонник едкого, местами довольно злого юмора в командах. Когда люди умеют подколоть друг друга, посмеяться над собственными ошибками, начальством, идиотскими ритуалами и вообще происходящим вокруг, работать становится заметно веселее. Особенно если в ответ на шутку можно получить не менее остроумную и никто потом не идёт писать заявление в HR про то, как ему…
💯30❤19🔥5🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @bvevvs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@bvevvs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ты знаешь, что коллегу собираются уволить, твои действия
Сохраню конфиденциальность, какой бы неприятной ни была ситуация 😬22%
Дам осторожный намёк, не раскрывая информацию напрямую 👀30%
Попытаюсь убедить руководство сообщить ему раньше.😮28%
Предупрежу его прямо, несмотря на последствия для себя 😼13%
Попробую помочь с альтернативной работой, не объясняя причин🦞7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд @leadgr · 31,685 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
I’m CTO, bitch @ctobtch · 20,219 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация @no_shame_facilitation · 22,556 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники @mnogosdelal · 25,891 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки @pm_god · 25,037 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Росбанк @Rosbank_official · 23,903 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Код Желтый @kod_zheltyi · 33,561 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#безвотэтоговотвсего” (@bvevvs), 7,680 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bvevvs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.