эмммм... час от часу не легче. Вот вам и рынок работодателя;) это вообще законно?
🤣55😱25🗿16😁3🙈1

Channel
@proProject1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36,170subscribers
+64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001313063129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proProject1 |
| Description | Как получить работу в ИТ с зп 300к+ 800+ офферов с ЗП до 1,2 млн. руб. Узнай свои шансы на бесплатной карьерной диагностике - @projectpro3 По вопросам рекламы @LocalTalent_bot № 49350375 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proProject1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 36,170 | +47 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 36,123 | +64 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 36,059 | -65 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 36,124 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 36,137 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 36,165 | +59 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 36,106 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 124,780 |
| Reactions total | 1,580 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,580 reactions across 24 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 634 | 40.1% | |
| ❤ | 256 | 16.2% | |
| 😁 | 206 | 13.0% | |
| 😱 | 135 | 8.54% | |
| 🤣 | 102 | 6.46% | |
| 👏 | 45 | 2.85% | |
| 🤬 | 43 | 2.72% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 2.47% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 2.09% | |
| 🙈 | 18 | 1.14% | |
| 🗿 | 16 | 1.01% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 0.696% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 0.443% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 0.443% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.253% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 0.253% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.253% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.127% | |
| 6 further kinds | 8 | 0.506% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proProject1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
эмммм... час от часу не легче. Вот вам и рынок работодателя;) это вообще законно?
🤣55😱25🗿16😁3🙈1
Нам нужен «Более стабильный карьерный трек» - или как нынче модно среди рекрутеров говорить Вам о том, что вы ПОПРЫГУНЧИК 🤣 Кстати, это одна из наиболее скрытых/ неочевидных и неоднозначных проблем в резюме. Причем частенько вы сами ее у себя не видите( А у вас какие ещё прикольные отказы были от рекрутеров?
😁17😱4🔥1
🥳🥳🥳 Оффер на технического менеджера проектов в ЯНДЕКС на 350к + много плюшек Как сказал клиент: «какой-то успешный успех без соприкасание с реальностью» 🤣 Ну да, всего-то определить позиционирование, детально расписать все свои проекты и достижения, сделать все правильно на хх, выложить по всем канонам, чтобы алгоритмы вынесли вас на верх поиска, все-го пройти 7 этапов собесов, параллельно еще около 5-10 крупняков …
🔥75❤11😁7😨4👍1💯1😴1
🟢 ЭФИР. Ищу работу управленцем. Что мне делать? или 3 категории менеджеров и их карьерные треки 13 августа 18:00 мск А проводить эфир мы будем с кем? С самым лучшим спикером - моим мужем - офигенным управленцем - он же Алексей Романов @ProYpravlenca - он же лысый красавчик слева Что обсудим: • А что вообще это за 3 категории управленцев, найдете себя! • Лайфхаки поиска работы - что делать в каждом случае • Самый л…
❤23
Треш история 3. Зарплата 915 000 у СРО в Аэрофлоте История, которая подорвала видимо многих в самом аэрофлоте, что нам аж начали писать опровержения 😂 Вот короткий отрывок: Древний зоопарк сервисов, написанный подрядчиками, нанимают своих карманных подрядчиков на аутсорс, в итоге платят в 3-4 раза больше рынка за поделки, которые еле работают. В итоге, качество сервисов ужасное (думаю все видели), но стараемся это …
😁26🤣18🔥9❤2
Треш История 2. Т банк. Или Зарплата 805 000 у Руководителя портфеля проектов в Т-банке ...И пропаганда фигачить 24/7.. Из каждого утюга пропаганда переработок и типа эффективности. На всех телеках, во всех видосах, на всех внутриком встречах от топов прямая мотивация фигачить 24/7 и забыть про все остальное. "Ты такой один", "ты можешь больше", "сделай задачу лучше, чем написано в постановке". В интранете каждый де…
😁15❤10😱9🐳2
AVITO. тяп-ляп и в продакшн Перфоманс ревью. Похоже на игру в кальмара. Повышаться проще через увольнение. Полное отсутствие разделения труда во многих командах: у вас не будет ни продакта, ни проджекта, ни тестировщика, ни аналитика. Выполнять все эти роли будет разраб (вы). Продолжение истории тут: https://t.me/local_talent_developers/241
👏24🙈15❤7
А давайте до понедельника запустим череду треш историй с наших каналов с ЗП;) 1 день = 1 история С вас - прочитать и по себе какую-нить анкетку заполнить, договорились? 😈 Начнем с Авито;)
❤24👨💻4👍1
👀Оля, а кто такой РМО и как им стать? Вчера получила такой вопрос от клиента продакта и даже сначала очень сильно удивилась, а потом дошло … дык а чего… роль уже такая редкая, что пора звать пояснительную бригаду))) Итак РМО - он же Project management Officer или руководитель проектного офиса. Ну и можно расшифровать как Project management Office - те собственно сам Проектный офис. Ключевая логика. Руководитель про…
❤28👍8👌7🤨2
🔥 Сегодня через 2 часа стартуем супер рисковую и дерзкую карьерную группу!!!! И нас почти 50 человек!! Коротко о том, что такое карьерная группа тут Август - супер время- пока другие чилят на пляжике, мы разрабатываем самые эффективные стратегии для наших клиентов и упаковываем для них лучшие резюме по рынку, которые потом становятся БЕНЧМАРКОМ в чатиках карьерных консультантов и HR 😈 Именно эти ребята уже в сентяб…
🔥15❤12🦄3
уже традиционная рубрика "дичь от HH" вот сегодня в одном из каналов увидела, что hh стал присылать на почту кандидатов запрос о поддтверждении трудовой книжкой конкретного места работы, ссылаясь на пункты пользовательского соглашения 😳😳😳 решила пойти заняться изучить, что ж там интересного есть и вам принести в виде развернутого поста 🔥 - если вам надо а пока напишите, с какой дичью вы столкнулись/ сталкиваетесь,…
🔥209🤯11
🔥 Подборка-сохраняшка самых полезных эфиров с канала. В этом году у нас 3 фокуса - разборы резюме, мок - собесы, анализ рынка от клиентов Этот пост будет постоянно актуализироваться новыми ТОПовыми статьями, подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять! 📹 ЭФИРЫ - РАЗБОРЫ РЕЗЮМЕ 🔴Разборы резюме project manager 🔴Разборы резюме product manager (эфир с 2-мя СРО) 🔴Разборы резюме аналитики (разные) 🔴Разборы резюме разработчиков (эф…
🔥19❤9👍3🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @proProject1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 17,262 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова” (@proProject1), 36,170 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proProject1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.