2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 20:47
76
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:36
76
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
93.4%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held
20 (10 September 2025 – 23 July 2026)
Views total
71
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
12
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
10
37.0%
❤
8
29.6%
😁
5
18.5%
👍
3
11.1%
😱
1
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы собрали вебинар про обучение в IT.
И увидели интересную вещь.
На встречу пришло много менеджеров — людей, которые хотят помогать другим развиваться.
А вот специалистов, которым самим сейчас сложно понять, куда расти дальше, почти не было.
И это очень показательно.
Несколько недель назад мы в Climbity проводили Lean Coffee с экспертами на тему:
«Обучение в IT: что работает, что бесит и что пора менять»
Говор…
Сколько зарабатывают продакты и проджекты?
Утащили у соседей статистику по ЗП для вас.
🔹 Средний оклад в месяц (без учета премий) по каждой позиции:
💸 Product Manager
Junior – 186 667 ₽ NET
Middle – 247 757 ₽ NET
Senior – 362 759 ₽ NET
Lead – 496 667 ₽ NET
💸 Project Manager
Junior – 102 948 ₽ NET
Middle – 193 969 ₽ NET
Senior – 306 270 ₽ NET
🔹 Компании, где больше всего платят с конкретными примерами зарплаты (б…
Ох! Как же я устаю от слов “у нас же много задач”, где на самом деле хаос дел и 5% прогресса: работаем много — двигаемся мало.
Все бежим, всем помогаем, со всеми созваниваемся…. Все устали, а бизнес не видел прогресс. Если вся система тормозит, героизмом это не лечится.
Чаще всего узкие места не в медленных людях, а в процессе:
- Входящие без фильтра. Любой «срочно» попадает в работу. Итог — прыгаем между задачам…
🟣Нестыдная фишка #101
Не стоит спрашивать у команды:
«Всё ли понятно?» — тишина, один кивок.
«Можем идти дальше?» — снова молчание.
«Нет возражений?» — опять все молчат.
❕Эти вопросы слишком общие и закрытые, подразумевают ответы «да/нет», и совсем не вовлекают в диалог.
👌Что вместо этого?
Задавайте открытые и более конкретные вопросы:
Всё ли понятно? → Что важно обсудить, прежде чем двинемся дальше?
Все согла…
Такс! У нас отличная новость 🚀
Переносим интенсив по планированию проектов и встречаемся — 18 октября (сб).
Освободились ещё пару мест — можно подключиться. Не стесняйтесь, пишите в лс.
Интенсив для команд, поэтому особенно жду БА, техлидов, тимлидов и ПМ.
Буду рада видеть вас на потоке! 🙌
Планирование — не только задача ПМа
Если план видит только один человек, проект слепой. Когда вся команда владеет базовым планированием — риски всплывают раньше, простоев меньше, сроки и бюджет защищены.
Почему это важно
Один ПМ не тянет всю неопределённость.
Команда, умеющая планировать, быстрее видит риски, выравнивает загрузку и держит дедлайны.
Что выигрывают роли
Разработчики
Декомпозиция до задач на 1–3 дн…
😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @climbity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Climbity” (@climbity), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/climbity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.