Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»

Channel

Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»

@StratoplanSchool

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,270subscribers

+1,357 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206076880
TypeChannel
Username@StratoplanSchool
DescriptionОсновной канал Школы менеджмента «Стратоплан» Сайт Школы: https://stratoplan-school.com Наш LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/school/stratoplan-school/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/StratoplanSchool

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,77918,27017,524.56 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,357. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,555–18,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:5518,270+149
9 Nov 2026, 21:5018,121+73
8 Nov 2026, 14:1818,048+35
7 Nov 2026, 10:4618,013+141
6 Nov 2026, 08:4617,872+21
5 Nov 2026, 10:4717,851+82
4 Nov 2026, 07:5817,769+92
3 Nov 2026, 05:4817,677+44
2 Nov 2026, 07:1617,633-2
1 Nov 2026, 07:5917,635-4
31 Oct 2026, 08:5917,639-11
30 Oct 2026, 07:2817,650-8
29 Oct 2026, 07:1817,658-9
28 Oct 2026, 07:4017,667-12
27 Oct 2026, 06:5517,679-7
26 Oct 2026, 05:2617,686-11
25 Oct 2026, 07:0817,697-1
24 Oct 2026, 10:1717,698-25
23 Oct 2026, 10:4617,723-2
22 Oct 2026, 09:3517,725first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 18,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held95 (24 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total69,610
Reactions total1,147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈84
Links
≈2,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,441 reactions across 93 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤77931.9%
🔥69428.4%
👍64426.4%
🙏783.20%
💯672.74%
😁612.50%
🤔512.09%
🤩281.15%
custom 5280603728552942782261.07%
🤯130.533%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC≈1,060 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Чёрный курс менеджмента завершился. Но что теперь изменится? Три вечера мы говорили о деньгах, задачах и людях. Надеемся, у вас остались конспекты и ощущение эмоционального подъёма: вот теперь всё станет по-другому. Раз уж мы говорили о жёстком менеджменте, отметим важное: одних знаний для перемен мало. Курс дал понимание. Изменения начинаются после него. Возьмём любую сильную книгу об управлении. Условно, ссылку …

💯8🔥8❤4👍3🤔1

12 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,400 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Вот и завершился Чёрный курс менеджмента. Сегодня мы говорили про ваших сотрудников. Но есть ещё один человек, от которого зависит состояние всей команды. Про него забывают чаще всего, и он сам в первую очередь. Это вы. Когда вы в последний раз заканчивали рабочий день с ощущением, что сделали что-то важное? Когда хотелось идти на встречу с командой, а новые задачи вызывали азарт, а не мысль «опять я»? Если это бы…

👍13❤6🔥6🤔1🤯1

12 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,740 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

НЕ понял, НЕ умеет, НЕ может, НЕ хочет? *️⃣Держите человека, который не тянет, потому что жалко его, да и не время увольнять сейчас? *️⃣Лучший сотрудник давно перестал быть лучшим, а вы заметили это последним? *️⃣Есть наболевшие вопросы связанные с вашими сотрудниками, которые вы даже боитесь озвучить, не говоря уж о том, чтобы начать их решать? Тогда приходите сегодня на заключительный вечер «Чёрного курса менеджм…

❤10👍7🙏5🔥2🤔2

11 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,820 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

По данным Gallup, 97% руководителей параллельно выполняют работу рядового специалиста. В среднем на неё уходит около 40% рабочего времени. Добавьте к этому ±12 человек в команде и получится очень знакомая многим из вас картина. Вы поставили задачу на бегу, в чате, между другими делами. Сотрудники её поняли по-своему. В пятницу результат оказался не тем, и в воскресенье вечером вы доделываете все сами. На следующе…

👍9🔥3🤩2❤1🙏1

11 Nov 2026, 08:49 UTC≈1,920 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Кивните если это про вас… *️⃣Договорились с командой, все всем разжевали, положили в рот, а коллеги опять сделали не то *️⃣О проблеме в проекте первым узнал ваш руководитель, а не вы *️⃣Вы весь день на встречах и в переписке, времени на работу практически не остается Если хоть что-то из этого знакомо, второй вечер «Чёрного курса менеджмента» для вас. Сегодня будем говорить о задачах, контроле и времени руководителя…

🔥11👍7🙏4🤩3❤2

10 Nov 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,920 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Три вопроса, на которые бизнес ждёт от руководителя быстрого и точного ответа: 1️⃣ Сколько стоит ваша команда в месяц? 2️⃣ Что она приносит компании взамен? 3️⃣ Если завтра бюджет или людей урежут на 20%, от чего первого вы откажетесь? Если хотя бы на один вопрос вы ответили «ну, примерно…» и задумались, вы не одни. 💡 Управлять командами обычно начинают лучшие инженеры, и считать стоимость своей работы и работы …

❤8🙏3🔥2🤔1

10 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,040 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Уже сегодня стартует открытый «Чёрный курс менеджмента»: три вечера про деньги, задачи и людей. Первый день мы решили посвятить деньгам. Все любят деньги, верно? И бизнес, на который вы работаете, — тоже. ❗️Будем говорить не про то, как попросить бюджет, а про то, как бизнес смотрит на вас. Для компании руководитель и его команда — строчка расходов. И бизнес постоянно, даже если вслух этого не говорит, задаёт себе …

❤11🔥10🙏4🤩3

9 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTC≈2,030 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Что изменится в ваших управленческих настройках к концу недели. ❗️Уже завтра в 17:00 GMT+3 стартует 3-дневный открытый «Черный курс менеджмента». Три вечера про деньги, задачи и людей. Но прежде чем вы присоединитесь, давайте поговорим о том, что может измениться в вашем управлении за эти три дня. Вы увидите свою работу так, как ее видит бизнес. Где ваша команда приносит деньги, где сливает время, кто в ней тянет …

❤13🔥9👍8🤔1custom 52806037285529427821

7 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,030 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Судя по вашим ответам, нам всем интересно, что происходит за пределами собственной команды. И это неудивительно: мы учим руководителей больше 16 лет, но до сих пор не можем найти ответы на многие вопросы. Думаем, они вам тоже будут интересны Например: *️⃣Сколько сейчас получает лид команды из пяти человек и сколько — из тридцати? *️⃣У кого в этом году всё нормально, а кто держится на кофе и упрямстве? *️⃣В скольки…

❤11👍8🔥4🤔3

7 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,860 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Poll

А вам когда-нибудь хотелось подсмотреть, как устроена работа у других тимлидов? Не в теории, а по-настоящему: зарплаты, команды, нагрузка, AI..

  1. Да, особенно зарплаты и рынок49%
  2. Интересно сравнить команды38%
  3. Любопытно узнать, как используют AI47%
  4. Конечно, давайте уже рассказывайте61%

The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤9👍5💯3😁3🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,070 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

На «Чёрный курс менеджмента» мы позвали людей с очень разными взглядами на жёсткость: управляющих партнёров Стратоплана, CTO и продуктовых руководителей больших компаний, авторов каналов, которые вы, скорее всего, читаете. Они будут рассказывать, спорить и не соглашаться друг с другом, а вы — примерять на себя. Три вечера по три эфира, 17:00–20:00 GMT+3. На курс уже записались больше 1200 руководителей. 👉🏻 Присоеди…

🔥15❤9👍7🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,970 views40 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤17🔥12🙏10🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @StratoplanSchool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @StratoplanSchool as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
21 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

А вам когда-нибудь хотелось подсмотреть, как устроена работа у других тимлидов? Не в теории, а по-настоящему: зарплаты, команды, нагрузка, AI..

  1. Да, особенно зарплаты и рынок49%
  2. Интересно сравнить команды38%
  3. Любопытно узнать, как используют AI47%
  4. Конечно, давайте уже рассказывайте61%

The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

Как вам дается эта управленческая гибкость?

  1. А. Я изо всех сил стараюсь всем нравиться, сглаживаю углы и боюсь испортить отношения.50%
  2. Б. Я могу стукнуть кулаком по столу, но потом ночами мучаюсь чувством вины.39%
  3. В. У меня жесткие рамки, и команда это знает, но иногда мне кажется, что я перегибаю.22%
  4. Г. Я робот, мне все равно на чувства, главное — метрики10%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

Как вы обычно поступаете перед сложным выбором? 👇

  1. Жду до последнего, пока не соберу 100% информации.25%
  2. Прыгаю в неизвестность и разбираюсь по ходу.40%
  3. Долго просчитываю вероятности, вздыхаю и всё равно сомневаюсь.58%
  4. Делегирую решение (и все риски) кому-то другому.4%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Какие управленческие «грабли» чаще всего мешают именно вам?

  1. Проще сделать самому, чем объяснить44%
  2. Надо просто еще поднажать28%
  3. Боссу виднее23%
  4. Всё вышеперечисленное периодически срабатывает29%
  5. Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)3%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники
@mnogosdelal · 25,885
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,028
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд
@leadgr · 32,624
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,749
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
pmclub — учим управлять
@pmclub · 20,690
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация
@no_shame_facilitation · 22,544
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
I’m CTO, bitch
@ctobtch · 20,226
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытый кампус «Школа менеджмента Стратоплан»” (@StratoplanSchool), 18,270 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StratoplanSchool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.