Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TeamLead. С места в career

Channel

TeamLead. С места в career

@smestavcareer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,437subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001222218709
TypeChannel
Username@smestavcareer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/smestavcareer

Growth

8,4378,4608,448.56 August 2026 — 8,460 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,456 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,441 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,437 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,434–8,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:268,437-4
12 Aug 2026, 16:058,441-15
9 Aug 2026, 19:418,456-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:488,459-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:348,460first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 8,437 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (1 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total18,232
Reactions total435
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

714 reactions across 21 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21029.4%
🔥21029.4%
👍15521.7%
😁405.60%
🤯385.32%
💯233.22%
😭111.54%
🍓81.12%
🤬60.84%
❤‍🔥50.7%
👏40.56%
🤩30.42%
🌭10.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 746reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @smestavcareer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.55%
1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
759
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,530
over 21 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqwk9QE7111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC294 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тот самый анекдот про жен...или не такой уж и анекдот Недавно услышала анекдот Знаете, почему от хороших жён уходят, а от плохих нет? Потому что когда жена хорошая — кажется, что все остальные ещё лучше. А когда плохая — думают, что другие будут ещё хуже Я сразу подумала про корпоративную культуру. Буквально недавно слышала очередную историю от знакомого: человек уходит из компании, где всё было хорошо — команда, а

💯14🍓5🔥2🌭1

11 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC709 views38 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

Когда контент-волна уходит Меня часто спрашивают, как я регулярно веду канал. И я всегда отвечала примерно одно и то же: я вижу контент в реальной жизни. Разговор за кофе, фраза на встрече, книга перед сном — всё это превращается в заметки в отдельном чате. А потом садишься и переводишь заметки в посты Бывают моменты, когда волна идей нахлёстывает так, что за один присест пишешь столько, что потом с грустью думаешь

22🔥10😁6

11 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC759 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzqwk9QE7Photo

Бизнес меняется быстрее, чем успеваешь подстроиться: рынок перегрет, конкуренция жёстче, а ИИ уже не тренд, а часть повседневной работы. Как в этих условиях принимать решения о развитии продукта — не наугад, а на основе того, что реально работает? Ответ будут искать на ProductSense'26 — одной из крупнейших конференций по управлению продуктами в России. 📍 10–11 сентября 2026 📍 Москва + онлайн-участие Среди спикеров

4👍2🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,010 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍿 Зарисовки из жизни блогера Пишешь большой, полезный пост, прикладываешь материалы, схемки, ссылки, весь такой серьёзный эксперт. Реакций — ноль, тишина. Зато пересылок — как будто туда спрятан пароль от счастья, и все его несут друзьям по-тихому, чтобы не спугнуть А потом пишешь что-то аля "Пук" в стиле Лебедева — и вот тут уже взрыв эмоций, огоньки, сердечки, обсуждения

😁33💯9👍7

7 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,170 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Более 30 лидеров IT-индустрии поделятся практическим опытом управления командами, отдельными сотрудниками и ИИ-агентами — на конференции для тимлидов TEAM LEAD TODAY 2026. Мероприятие пройдет 10 сентября в Москве (ВДНХ, Бизнес.Техноград). В числе спикеров — эксперты компаний Сбер, Яндекс, Газпромнефть, Альфа Банк, Гринатом, Шереметьево Хэндлинг, Билайн, Naumen, Positive Technologies, Skillaz, Herbarium Games и многи

5🔥3👍2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,110 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Найм на вырост: риск или стратегия? Я давно хотела поговорить про найм честно — не про то, как написать вакансию, а про то, как принимать решение, когда идеального кандидата нет В гостях Галина Ширанкова, руководитель отдела "Социальные взаимодействия", ВКонтакте, ex-product unit lead в мессенджере Авито. 10+ лет развивает продукты в крупных ИТ-компаниях, автор канала "Полтора продакта || Галя Ширанкова" Один инса

🔥11👍84❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Думаете, руководителям не дают развивающую обратную связь? И что у них нет планов по развитию? А вот и нет! С Олегом Елизаровым, руководителем команды разработки Composer в Ozon Tech, обсудили, у кого какие зоны развития Делитесь, кому какую развивающую обратную связь в последний раз давали😈

4🔥1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ozon_tech

В чём ваша сила как руководителя? А что требует развития? Привет! С вами Олег Елизаров, руководитель команды разработки Composer, и приглашённый гость — Ольга Елисеева, директор центра сервиса и аутсорсинга Инфосистемы Джет, автор канала @smestavcareer. Сегодня хотим поделиться своими размышлениями на тему навыков руководителя и спросить у вас: в чём сила, брат коллеги? А какие ваши качества требуют развития? 😀 Ол

🔥94👍3

31 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,520 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ласло Бок "Работа рулит!" Это одна из первых книг про управление, которую я прочитала. И история её появления у меня — отдельная Как-то держала в руках бумажный журнал (да, да! Это было давно☺️). На последней странице — конкурс: разгадай кроссворд и получи книгу в подарок. Я попросила мужа разобраться — он у меня умный, справится. Справился. Когда пришёл забирать приз, ему сказали, что он чуть ли не единственный, к

👍1712🔥6

29 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,460 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чему бы вы хотели научиться у своего руководителя? Вчера меня подарили такой вопрос — и я задумалась. У моего руководителя много сильных качеств, но есть две вещи, которые я наблюдаю уже давно и которые каждый раз искренне впечатляют Первая — почти магическая. Приносишь ему таблицу: новая схема мотивации с расчётами, аналитика продаж, цифры по доходам и расходам. Он молча смотрит минуту. Задаёт пару вопросов. И схо

22🔥11👍4🍓3

27 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,530 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Выходим на новый уровень! Кроме традиционных сессий по четвергам, встречаемся на очном митапе 29 августа в Москве 👍 Это не "ещё одно мероприятие", а день, полностью собранный из практики и живых мастер‑классов. Никаких общих слов — только разборы, упражнения и инструменты, которые можно унести к себе в команду Три зала, два слота — выбираете свой фокус: ❤️ воркшоп по работе с ИИ‑агентами: как использовать их не ра

🔥109👍5

24 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,630 views29 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Как работать с визионерами? Прилетел, накинул задачу, не хочет углубляться в детали, хочет результат здесь и сейчас. Стратегический горизонт, большие идеи, нетерпение к операционным деталям — это про роль, а не про должность Я понимаю, откуда частенько берется раздражение. Но ведь без визионеров не было бы ни успешных компаний, ни команд, которые делают что-то по-настоящему значимое И здесь есть момент, про которы

12👍9🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @smestavcareer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 163,961 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TeamLead. С места в career” (@smestavcareer), 8,437 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smestavcareer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.