Заметки, продуктовые инсайты, кейсы, обмен экспертизой от Сергея Колоскова. Консультирую по продуктам, процессам,командам,преподаю и провожу воркшопы.Связь @SKoloskov Perfluence Реестр РКН https://clck.ru/3G5nL5
Created
23 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @eduproduct. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,845–20,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 19:31
19,877
+4
9 Nov 2026, 04:10
19,873
-3
7 Nov 2026, 22:58
19,876
-4
5 Nov 2026, 20:48
19,880
+1
4 Nov 2026, 20:08
19,879
-4
3 Nov 2026, 22:36
19,883
-8
2 Nov 2026, 19:40
19,891
-9
1 Nov 2026, 19:56
19,900
-3
31 Oct 2026, 22:36
19,903
-3
31 Oct 2026, 01:21
19,906
-1
29 Oct 2026, 21:59
19,907
-11
27 Oct 2026, 16:49
19,918
+8
25 Oct 2026, 16:40
19,910
-3
24 Oct 2026, 15:46
19,913
-8
23 Oct 2026, 16:36
19,921
-2
22 Oct 2026, 15:39
19,923
-6
21 Oct 2026, 09:49
19,929
-10
20 Oct 2026, 10:51
19,939
+2
19 Oct 2026, 11:27
19,937
-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:29
19,940
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.69%
avg views ÷ 19,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.196%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
44 (30 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
10,700
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈63
Videos
≈8
Links
≈1,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
52s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
251 reactions across 43 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
112
44.6%
❤
80
31.9%
🔥
56
22.3%
👌
3
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 44 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FreshProductGo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
13.6%
6 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,530
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,620
over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqug4oJi
1
23 July 2026
23 July 2026
2VtzqvyfCpa
1
30 July 2026
30 July 2026
2W5zFG967a9
1
29 August 2026
29 August 2026
2W5zFHjNZaZ
1
20 October 2026
20 October 2026
2W5zFJ7EpiM
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2W5zFJSejmj
1
15 September 2026
15 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Как оценивать скорость разработки в эпоху Claude Code, Cursor и AI-агентов?
Раньше оценить производительность разработки было относительно просто: смотрели на сроки задач, Story Points, количество закрытых тикетов и скорость релизов. Сейчас эти показатели всё меньше говорят о реальной эффективности. Разработчик с Claude Code может за день сделать то, на что раньше уходило 3–4 дня. Но это не означает, что продукт вый…
💸 Экономика продукта в кризис — новый сезон Podlodka Product Crew
Рынок штормит: пользователи осторожнее тратят деньги, бюджеты на развитие продуктов сокращаются, а бизнес всё настойчивее требует снижать издержки — в том числе с помощью AI.
В итоге продактам нужно постоянно находить точки роста в условиях, когда стандартных инструментов уже недостаточно.
С 9 ноября стартует новый сезон Podlodka Product Crew — «Эко…
10 неочевидных сервисов, которые ИИ постепенно делает ненужными
ИИ убивает не только копирайтеров, переводчиков и генераторы картинок. Гораздо интереснее то, что происходит с небольшими B2B-сервисами, которые годами зарабатывали на обработке информации и автоматизации отдельных операций.
Все для роста в профессии от редакции - https://t.me/FreshProductGo/1863
Вот что постепенно схлопывается.
1. Обогащение клиентски…
Всё для роста продакта: курсы, кейсы и личная поддержка
Если хочешь вырасти в продуктовой профессии, не обязательно собирать знания по кусочкам из десятков источников. Мы собрали программы и практические материалы под конкретные задачи: найти работу, прокачать навыки, научиться работать с метриками или увереннее защищать продуктовые решения.
Выбирай то, что поможет именно тебе.
1. Хочешь найти работу или перейти н…
AI есть у всех сотрудников. Почему эффекта нет? 👀
По данным рынка, AI применяют 88% сотрудников, а только 6% говорят, что он действительно изменил их работу. В Авито начинали так же: после объявления курса на AI-first нейросетями пользовались около 10% сотрудников при цели 80%.
Чтобы сдвинуть ситуацию, мы пошли тремя путями:
➖ Нашли AI-чемпионов: с начала года их стало 180 вместо 10.
➖ Собрали инфраструктуру: базу…
Какую доску выбрать для команды? Попробуйте Битрикс24 — здесь онлайн-доски сразу идут вместе с задачами, чатами и видеозвонками.
— 20+ готовых шаблонов: SWOT-анализ, цели и ключевые результаты (OKR), дорожная карта, блок-схема
— сотрудники работают на доске вместе и в реальном времени
— доступ настраивается по правам: каждый видит только свои доски
— уволенные сотрудники теряют доступ автоматически, данные остаются …
Фичи, которые стали тиражируемыми (часть 3)
Интересные продукты из других стран, конкретные механики, в которых компании или целые рынки действительно были первопроходцами. Сегодня в фокусе Азия. Ранее публиковали https://t.me/FreshProductGo/1809 и https://t.me/FreshProductGo/1813
1. Япония и QR-код, придуманный для автозаводов. В 1994 году инженеры Denso разработали QR-код для отслеживания автомобильных компоненто…
Продуктовый подход часто путают с набором фреймворков. На деле это способ мышления: ты смотришь на ценность для пользователя, делаешь короткие итерации и решаешь по метрикам и живым откликам клиентов, а не по ощущениям.
Такое мышление не берётся из воздуха. Оно складывается из того, что ты читаешь, чьи кейсы разбираешь и с кем это обсуждаешь. Поэтому лента, в которой много полезного, помогает расти почти незаметно.
…
Всё для роста продакта от редакции канала
Здесь собраны возможности, которые помогут тебе расти в продуктовой профессии: освоить новые навыки, подготовиться к собеседованиям, перейти на следующий карьерный уровень и научиться увереннее защищать продуктовые решения.
Не нужно собирать знания по кусочкам из десятков источников. Выбирай задачу, которую хочешь решить прямо сейчас, и начинай с подходящего формата.
1. Об…
Найти слепые зоны в брифе, разобрать решения конкурентов, составить список экранов, включая те, о которых обычно вспоминают только в разработке. Все это AI делает, если правильно ставить ему задачу
Продуктовый дизайнер Даниил Шишко 😎 собрал весь свой путь от идеи до прототипа в бесплатный гайд. Внутри 8 готовых промптов (подходят для Codex и Claude Code) и скилл, с которым агент не додумывает от себя, а ведет по эта…
Как оценивать компетенции продакта: 7 методологий
Одна из проблем продуктового менеджмента в том, что до сих пор нет единого стандарта, по которому можно однозначно определить уровень продакта. В одной компании сильным считают человека, который умеет быстро запускать фичи, в другой от него ждут роста P&L, а в третьей он должен выстраивать работу нескольких продуктовых команд. Оценивать нужно не знание терминов, а сп…
Что будет, если дать AI больше свободы?
Во втором выпуске «ПРОДАКТовой корзины» MAGNIT OMNI собрали вместе: своих экспертов, гостей из топовых бигтехов и стендап-комика Севу Ловкачёва, чтобы разобраться.
AI уже сам предлагает гипотезы, ставит опыты и распоряжается бюджетом. А ещё — персональные цены, роботакси и магазины, которые больше не просто магазины.
Что из этого в прод, а что пора выкинуть?
Разобрали, поспор…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @FreshProductGo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @FreshProductGo as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FreshProductGo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@cyfruss named in 2 posts, 16 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 20 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Product Management & AI @ruspm · 25,014 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Вакансии для продакт-менеджеров @productjobgo · 23,142 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,222 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко @normalno_delaj · 21,965 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева @vladimir_merkushev · 21,822 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта @productdo · 25,000 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Epic Growth — рост продуктов @epicgrowth · 26,082 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах @blackproduct · 21,248 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Job for Products and Projects @forproducts · 70,751 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Hire ProProduct - Продуктовые вакансии @hireproproduct · 24,920 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
GoPractice! @gopractice · 29,393 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
No Flame No Game @proproduct · 38,615 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
pmclub — учим управлять @pmclub · 20,691 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Вакансии для продактов и проджектов @product_jobs · 36,994 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах @brainshare · 21,719 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
AgileFluent: карьера без границ @agilefluent · 48,764 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Hard Client @hardclient · 22,912 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Эрудиция | Digital и бизнес образование @eruditurl24 · 96,339 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,396 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты @dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 35,144 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки @pm_god · 25,037 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова @proProject1 · 40,483 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов @bossofyourboss · 27,282 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,088 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fresh Product Manager” (@FreshProductGo), 19,877 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreshProductGo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.