Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net +955. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,734–8,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 11:10
7,875
-6
5 Nov 2026, 02:00
7,881
-45
2 Nov 2026, 08:39
7,926
-11
30 Oct 2026, 08:38
7,937
+40
27 Oct 2026, 02:55
7,897
-5
24 Oct 2026, 04:17
7,902
-20
21 Oct 2026, 14:27
7,922
+9
15 Oct 2026, 13:49
7,913
-6
12 Oct 2026, 21:19
7,919
-18
5 Oct 2026, 23:41
7,937
-12
28 Sept 2026, 10:15
7,949
-28
19 Sept 2026, 02:18
7,977
-5
14 Sept 2026, 14:38
7,982
-13
10 Sept 2026, 16:17
7,995
-25
5 Sept 2026, 13:20
8,020
+62
1 Sept 2026, 13:12
7,958
+191
29 Aug 2026, 07:26
7,767
+385
26 Aug 2026, 00:04
7,382
+463
23 Aug 2026, 10:26
6,919
+15
20 Aug 2026, 02:08
6,904
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 19 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 7,875 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.412%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
24 (19 May 2025 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
4,850
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 01:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Videos
1
Links
226
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,484 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
537
36.2%
🔥
473
31.9%
👍
447
30.1%
👎
13
0.876%
🤯
7
0.472%
💩
3
0.202%
😱
2
0.135%
😢
1
0.067%
🤮
1
0.067%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ребята из DevCrowd собирают ответы для ежегодного исследования руководителей разработки, вливайтесь.
Если вдруг не знакомы: DevCrowd уже несколько лет делают независимые исследования IT-профессий, опросили больше 15 000 человек, отчеты выкладывают в открытый доступ.
Исследование руководителей у них выходит четвертый год, и на него потом регулярно ссылаются, когда заходит разговор про зарплаты тимлидов, нагрузку ил…
Вписался в необычное для себя мерооприятие - среди спикеров айтишник я один, остальные ребята - бизнесмены. Суть встречи - поболтать о том, как меняется роль руководителя высокого уровня со всей этой ИИзацией всего на свете. Условие участия - подписаться на коллег. Инфа про них ниже.
🔥 Вы годами выходили из операционки. А теперь пора обратно?
Не тащи всё на себе, доверяй команде, перестань участвовать в каждом реше…
В этом году исполнилось 25 лет, как я ковыряюсь в ИТ, из них лет 15 я занимаю позиции уровня +- СТО. Когда я был юным техдиром, хватание за все подряд и вписывание себя во все задачи не казалось какой-то проблемой, энергии хватало на все. Потом я подрос, и с некоторым удивлением обнаружил, что вписывание себя в задачи стало более осознанным, но "за все подряд" осталось, просто слегка видоизменилось. Периодически на п…
Про менеджеров-носорогов #пролюдей
У нас есть мероприятие для вновь присоединившихся - что-то типа групповой онординг-сессии. Приходят коллеги и рассказывают про контору, про ее историю, отвечают на вопросы. Крайне полезное мероприятие. На последней встрече был разогревочный слайд - кто ты сегодня? Ну и там котики, ежики, совы и прочая милота. А мне вспомнился носорог. Редкое, мощное животное, НО, почти ничего не ви…
Про смену еще одной парадигмы #2 (#менеджмент)
Немного проясню, что я имел ввиду в прошлом посте и отвечу на вопросы читателей.
Система, которую я не то, чтобы предлагаю, скорее пытаюсь осмыслить и прикинуть, можно ли ее как-то прислонить к реальности, не является в чистом виде замещающей для текущей конфигурации "Должностная инструкция"->"Описание вакансии"->"Матрица компетенций"->Человек.
Идея в следующем. Пока…
Про смену еще одной парадигмы (#менеджмент)
Вопрос в зал: у кого есть должностные инструкции? - лес рук. Не буду спрашивать, что в них, все-равно их видели ровно один раз при приеме на работу, ну может два, если что-то поменялось. При этом чем занят человек на самом деле? Хорошо если чем-то похожим, что было в описании вакансии:) Но часто (в ИТ по крайней мере) и вакансия слабо отражает суть того, что будет, а уж д…
Некоторые вещи просто требуют времени #философское #поворчать
Если кто-то 50 лет назад посадил дуб на вашем участке, вы получаете то, что нельзя было купить готовым, ускорить или "оптимизировать". Если вы хотите получить все и сразу с чистого листа в чистом поле - вам это не удастся. Только ждать. И помогать расти.
Потому что некоторые вещи просто требуют времени.
Сейчас мы живём в эпоху "мгновенного" результата. …
The shares total 235%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Всяких форматов обещанный пост
На ближайшей тусовке в Питере мы планируем "слегка" расширить линейку форматов. еще больше интерактива. Какие затащим пока не очень понятно, но работаем над всеми.
1️⃣ Классические доклады
Эксперт делится опытом: проблема → путь → результат. Без воды, с выводами, которые можно внедрить "завтра".
Для вас, если хотите глубины по конкретной теме, цените подготовленную подачу и готовы …
Про страх публичных выступлений (#пролюдей)
Страх перед выступлением - это нормально. Даже у бывалых. Многие думают, что хороший спикер - это тот, кто не волнуется. На самом деле, хороший спикер не боится своего волнения. Он им пользуется. Волнуются все.
Страх перед трибуной или камерой вообще не признак слабости. Это реакция на ситуацию, где ты выходишь из зоны комфорта и делаешь что-то важное. Если бы тебе было …
Про задние мысли (#пролюдей)
Подведению итогов года посвящается. Каждый год в декабре принято подводить определенные итоги прошедшего года. До итогов я еще не добрался, как и до конца года, зато очередная книжка напомнила мне про одно чудесное когниивное искажение.
Ставлю пиво, что вы когда-нибудь слышали от коллеги: "Ну, это было очевидно!" или "Я же говорил, что так и будет!" Наверняка вы столкнулись с эффектом з…
Фотка к посту выше. Я собираю материалы и заметки и вернусь:)
❤28👍11🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @yetanotherworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 235%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Teamlead Good Reads – ежедневные советы про менеджмент людей и команд @leadgr · 31,685 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Менеджер от боженьки @pm_god · 25,037 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
FEDOR BORSHEV @pmdaily · 23,648 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Максим Дорофеев: Прокрастинация и джедайские техники @mnogosdelal · 25,891 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Нестыдная фасилитация @no_shame_facilitation · 22,556 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
I’m CTO, bitch @ctobtch · 20,219 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
запуск завтра @ctodaily · 33,711 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир глазами другого человека” (@yetanotherworld), 7,875 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yetanotherworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.