Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Менделеевщина!

Channel

Менделеевщина!

@mendeleevshina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,971subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001402180375
TypeChannel
Username@mendeleevshina
DescriptionВ темные времена особенно заметно хороших людей - их подсвечивают снизу кострами
Created22 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mendeleevshina

Growth

22,97123,00922,9905 August 2026 — 23,009 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,009 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,004 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,999 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,984 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,983 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,987 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,973 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,971 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,965–23,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:1922,971-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:4822,973+1
12 Aug 2026, 11:1422,972-15
11 Aug 2026, 14:4522,987+4
10 Aug 2026, 13:1222,983-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:2122,984-15
8 Aug 2026, 17:3422,999-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:1523,005+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:5023,004-5
6 Aug 2026, 02:0423,009no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0623,009first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.1%
avg views ÷ 22,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,070
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held81 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total654,010
Reactions total9,623
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,000
Videos
1,600
Links
2,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 37s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,478 reactions across 72 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3,62142.7%
💯86410.2%
5316.26%
custom 52154762274558532463163.73%
custom 53078327646476200342512.96%
🤪2382.81%
🔥2282.69%
💊2252.65%
🤬2162.55%
custom 53889981976139657551922.26%
👏1742.05%
custom 49835307405882169591722.03%
custom 49836849556839472511601.89%
custom 52827856363638070991321.56%
🤔1271.50%
💔1251.47%
👍1211.43%
custom 52175655615416331701161.37%
🕊1031.21%
😱851.00%
17 further kinds4815.67%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,623reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 81 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mendeleevshina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈4,990 views119 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

Бля это разъёб ))) для некоторых друзей пиздец жиза )))

🤪56custom 528278563636380709928🤣27🔥41🐳1🗿1🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈7,000 views61 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Это безусловное уголовные дело. Если эти бабы на видео врут - то пусть едут шить варежки в Мордовию. Но если не врут, то варежки должен поехать шить кто-то другой

💯36custom 53078327646476200348custom 498353074058821695973😱3custom 49836091581011074712custom 52154762274558532461custom 53889981976139657551

15 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈6,670 views123 reactionsread 16 August 2026

А че с бензином опять?

🤣78custom 521756556154163317014🦄12💯6🤬3custom 53889981976139657553custom 49836091581011074712custom 53078327646476200342

15 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈7,210 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026

«Между нами химия» удивительный образец вполне годного российского сериала. Еще и Бортич 😍

👍19custom 538899819761396575513custom 49836849556839472513custom 538904868065956301221💯1

14 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈8,840 views198 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Директор? Пошел ты в жопу, директор… (с)

🤣157custom 530783276464762003421custom 526473767268490739610custom 53889981976139657554custom 498360915810110747132💔1

14 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC≈7,430 views41 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Если убрать исторический контекст, получится очень интересная фотография, прости меня, господи

custom 542704279887861010722custom 60777517804043658618custom 53889981976139657556custom 54250919517183094463🤣2

14 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈10,800 views172 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

200 млрд в год это по ярду в рабочий день. То есть менять надо ~триллион. Думаю, что даже мировой оборот крипта-фиат выглядит скромнее ))) всегда любил людей, не умеющих пользоваться калькулятором )))

🤣122👍24🔥75custom 49836849556839472515custom 53078327646476200344custom 52154762274558532463custom 52175655615416331702

14 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈7,770 views56 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Пора!

🤣474💯3custom 53890486806595630122

14 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈7,070 views109 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Agdchan

Нам точно надо закапываться. Помните: мы находимся в процессе гераномахии - мифической войны журавлей и карликов, в классическом сюжете древне-греческих мифов. Журавли атакуют с воздуха (герань это « геран» журавль по-гречески). Карлики прячутся под землю. Метро отлично. Но мало. Надо создавать подземные города. Гераномахия это всерьез и надолго.

💊59🗿24💯12😱54🤣2custom 54475445031435049372👏1

13 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈7,730 views89 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @pominutno

Прослушиваются стуки SOS. — Три коротких удара, потом три более продолжительных и снова три точки. Пауза — и все по новой. Все без исключения на корабле знали, что это SOS — сигнал бедствия, который подавали моряки с затопленной подлодки, — расскажет связист «Петра Великого».

💔58🕊20🗿54custom 49836091581011074711custom 54250919517183094461

13 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC≈8,020 views100 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Мыши плакали, кололись, но продолжали изучать нюансы нового крипторегулирования Впрочем, я всех предупреждал

custom 498368495568394725142💯22custom 5215476227455853246147custom 49092650952734808944custom 49835307405882169594👏3custom 49836091581011074713

13 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈8,210 views221 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video

Примерно так я себя чувствовал на различных совещаниях по подготовке нового криптозакона

🤣172🔥18💯13custom 49836849556839472518custom 52154762274558532465😱41

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @mendeleevshina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mendeleevshina edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,630 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

InDeFi SmartBank
@indefibank · 395
8 posts
Биржа EXVED
@exved · 1,170
7 posts
Крипта, темки, Михаил
@crypto_mihail · 645
3 posts
Записки старого трейдера
@zapiskioldtrader · 67
3 posts
Артель18🤡🇺🇸
@artel18 · 35
2 posts
Р2Р обмен у Bulatа 💵
@bulat16_KC · 56
2 posts
Даниил Гридасов
@gridasov_daniil · 17,530
2 posts
Царство Jeralda
@JeraldRekaChannel · 24
2 posts
Круги о P2P
@krugioP2P · 1,674
2 posts
BTC | Algo Trade
@profit_algo_btc · 24
2 posts
Крипта Майнинг Деньги
@airdrop_fyuchersy · 30,969
1 post
an[G]us_dei
@anGus_dei · 32
1 post
Аркатов. Смыслы | Arkatov. Senses
@arkatov_senses · 205
1 post
ARMA-Crypto
@ArmaCrypto · 925
1 post
Blue Winston
@bluesna · 56
1 post
BOOKHOUSE HQ
@BookhouseHQ · 39
1 post
🎓 Крипто Академик
@crypto_akademic · 8
1 post
Ян Триш | Дневник инве100₽а
@crypto_trish · 1,302
1 post
Криптоминетчица
@cryptomunet · 6
1 post
Think about
@cryptopure · 50
1 post
Крипта, крема и сплетни
@cryptospletnitsa · 3,619
1 post
Родион Типцов
@directolog_academy · 1,525
1 post
RUSSIAN DOOMER 🇷🇺
@dumersky · 1,285
1 post
FINTECHCONSULTING
@fintechuniversity · 407
1 post
General mining⛩
@generalminings · 6
1 post
BELOKOPYTOV 💸 CRYPTO ASSETS 🦾 GENUMM
@GENUMM_cryptogeneration · 161
1 post
#golosoff
@golosoffcrypto · 67
1 post
ИнфоПЕНА
@InfoPENA · 52
1 post
IQCRYPTO | News
@IQCrypto_News · 32
1 post
Hodl & Hedge
@Just_Hedge_it · 257
1 post
KansayEX
@KansayEX · 239
1 post
Юлия Захарченко | PRO крипту
@kriptofinance · 2,147
1 post
Логово кубаноида
@logovo_qbanoida · 90
1 post
Мендель лошня
@mendelpezdel · 3
1 post
Вопреки
@potokk27 · 81
1 post
Никита Клинов (Qubba)
@qubba · 8,961
1 post
Блог Романа Суднева
@RomanSudnev · 3,378
1 post
Русское будущее
@russianfuture · 10,540
1 post
SCAMSHOT
@skamshot · 37,837
1 post
Stop Scam | Обличаем мошенников в P2P
@stopscam_p2p · 61
1 post
Криптослав
@swagdrops · 4
1 post
ТРИ КИТА
@TR1K1TA · 1,320
1 post
USDT Обмен Российская сеть офисов обмена криптовалют за наличные
@usdtether_obmen · 656
1 post
ВЭД. Мошенники. Черный список участников ВЭД рынка
@ved_black_list · 785
1 post
ВЭД платежи в Азию и не только.
@VEDpathway · 6,637
1 post
Виктор Першиков
@viktor_pershikov · 9,088
1 post
White Paper
@white_ppr · 841
1 post
Yves Saint Paymént
@YvesSaintPayment · 221
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 133,143
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
На пенсию в 35 лет
@pensiya35 · 123,553
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 451,372
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Банкста
@banksta · 437,402
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Менделеевщина!” (@mendeleevshina), 22,971 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mendeleevshina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.