Channel
@gen_m
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
67,051subscribers
-91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001287067034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gen_m |
| Description | Официальный канал Gennady M http://www.youtube.com/@GennadyM https://twitter.com/Gennady___M Только по делу: [email protected] По вопросам рекламы @SatoshiAds |
| Created | 24 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gen_m |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @gen_m/4403 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC | @GenadyM/112023 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gen_m/4407 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC | @GenadyM/112525 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gen_m/4409 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC | @GenadyM/112726 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gen_m/4411 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC | @GenadyM/112827 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gen_m/4414 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC | @GenadyM/113029 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gen_m/4418 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC | @GenadyM/113331 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @GenadyM | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (15–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @gen_m — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 67,051 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 67,072 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 67,093 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 67,106 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 67,128 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 67,144 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 67,141 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 67,143 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 67,155 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 67,156 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 67,141 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 67,142 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 67,142 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (23 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 577,250 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
⚡️Уже видели новость? Алексей побил мировой рекорд по доходности на последнем турнире Binance — 12 000 % за неделю! Ссылка на его канал — https://t.me/+mwZPn0Tf3XpjZjcy Для тех кто не в курсе: Алексей основал свой хедж-фонд в 2024 году, который работает только на ИИ-моделях и собрал в управлении $105 млн. Его успех строится на 100 % благодаря его дисциплине и подходе. Его подход - феномен. Он работает с тысячами …
США готовятся направить ультиматум 35 государствам-подписантам заявления об ИИ, требуя сделать выбор между американскими и китайскими технологическими экосистемами. Участие в коалиции Pax Silicaобъявили несовместимым с одновременным сотрудничеством с аналогичными китайскими структурами, такими как WAICO. Госдеп предупреждает партнеров, что «нельзя сидеть на двух стульях» и совмещать членство в западных альянсах …
Банк России будет наблюдать за практиками мисселинга при продаже криптовалют и цифровых инструментов и наказывать участников нарушений, сообщил зампред ЦБ Михаил Мамута. Мисселинг — это обман при продаже, когда вам предлагают один товар или услугу вместо другой. Продавец скрывает минусы, говорит не всю правду или выдаёт рискованный продукт за надежный вклад. Чаще всего это случается в банках и страховых компаниях…
РБК сообщает: Городской совет Нью Йорка начал расследование в отношении Polymarket, Kalshi, а также бирж Coinbase и Gemini. Их подозревают в использовании «ложных, вводящих в заблуждение или недобросовестных» методов продвижения. «Совет рассмотрит сообщения о том, что Polymarket использовала или позволяла использовать блогеров в соцсетях для побуждения молодых людей делать ставки на «событийные контракты» с помощью…
РБК сообщает: Замглавы думского комитета по информполитике Антон Горелкин, прокомментирвал предложение Банка России включить стейблкоин USDT в перечень криптовалют, доступных к публичному обращению на российских биржах. «С долларовым стейблкойном, принадлежащим офшорной компании Tether, не так все просто. Да, у инвесторов эта криптовалюта пользуется большой популярностью, но важно понимать, что «цифровым долларом» …
На Тайване впервые прошли учения по замедлению интернета, сообщило Центральное новостное агентство острова. Скорость передачи мобильных данных 4G и 5G была намеренно снижена на полчаса для имитации сбоя связи. Телефонные звонки, СМС и система оповещения населения работали в обычном режиме. Жители острова могли пользоваться проводным подключением к интернету по кабелю, а также Wi-Fi. Пользовались ли тайваньские св…
Власти Вьетнама утвердили новые правила, предусматривающие административную ответственность за нарушения в сфере цифровых активов. Они вступят в силу 1 сентября, перед запуском регулируемого рынка криптовалют в стране. За торговлю криптовалютой через нелицензированные платформы предусмотрен штраф до 50 млн донгов (около $1,9 тыс.). За несанкционированный выпуск токенов и серьезные нарушения требований по противоде…
В последние дни криптосообщество активно обсуждает историю с потерей криптовалюты на сумму около $115 млн, связанную с пользователями аппаратных биткоин-кошельков Coldcard. Независимо от причин этого инцидента, подобные случаи вновь поднимают вопрос, который обычно остается без внимания: насколько можно доверять процессу создания seed-фразы. Большинство современных аппаратных и программных кошельков генерируют see…
💳 Одна виртуальная карта Плати в Пути — десятки возможностей Забудьте об ограничениях при оплате зарубежных сервисов. С виртуальной картой вы можете: ✅ Оплачивать подписки (ChatGPT, Spotify, Netflix, YouTube Premium и другие сервисы) ✅ Покупать приложения, игры и цифровые товары ✅ Оплачивать рекламу и рабочие инструменты ✅ Совершать покупки в иностранных интернет-магазинах ✅ Расплачиваться за границей в любом м…
Santiment публикует отчёт, говорящий о том, что на рынке биткоина десятилетиями не происходит ничего нового. Когда рынок находится в состоянии максимального страха и апатии, новостные ресурсы публикуют апокалиптические прогнозы падения цены биткоина, киты покупают. Киты и акулы биткоина продолжают покупать всё больше в свои кошельки на уровне $63K - $65K. Тем временем, микровладельцы демонстрируют самое резкое …
Мигранты захватившие испанский город Сеута, некоторые подробности, проливающие свет на стороны, подготовившие эту провокацию и возможные последствия. Эпштейн жив и продолжает угрожать участникам его бизнеса. Появляются всё новые и новые жертвы. В своём доме найден мёртвым Даниэль Сиад, которого несколько женщин обвиняли в подборе жертв для Джеффри Эпштейна. Когда закончится СВО? Пока она не собирает заканчиваться…
США израсходовали «практически все» дальнобойные ракеты в войне с Ираном на фоне опасений более широкого конфликта. Это вызывает серьёзные опасения относительно готовности вооружённых сил к возможным будущим столкновениям. Исчерпанные боеприпасы в основном представляют собой ключевые ракеты армии класса «земля-земля»: тактические ракетные системы армии (ATACMS) и ракеты точного удара (PrSM). Два источника указали,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @gen_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 10,978 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
9 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gennady M” (@gen_m), 67,051 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gen_m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.