Та самая Уютная Тележенька!
По вопросам рекламы: reklama@tema.ru
Ассистентка: zam@tema.ru
Личная почта: tema@tema.ru
Самые Честные Новости: https://vkvideo.ru/playlist/-211437014_7
Страница включена Роскомнадзором в перечень любимых: artl.ru/LYuRZ
Created
6 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 966,406–976,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:57
972,194
-3,207
11 Aug 2026, 15:13
975,401
+7,822
10 Aug 2026, 16:21
967,579
-2,325
9 Aug 2026, 14:13
969,904
-1,672
8 Aug 2026, 12:44
971,576
-726
7 Aug 2026, 10:25
972,302
+1,254
6 Aug 2026, 10:50
971,048
+6
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
971,042
first reading
Engagement
1,088 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.31%
avg views ÷ 972,194 subscribers
Avg views / post
71,000
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 1,088 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
1,088 (26 August 2025 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
6,818,800
Reactions total
86,764
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,620
Videos
≈151
Links
≈3,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
3 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 9,880 → 3.0 hours: 16,000 → 6.0 hours: 30,600 → 12 hours: 33,900still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
4.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
34,048 reactions across 41 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,160
29.8%
👍
6,973
20.5%
💯
4,039
11.9%
😁
3,646
10.7%
🔥
2,586
7.60%
🤣
1,644
4.83%
💩
1,301
3.82%
👏
472
1.39%
🤡
454
1.33%
✍
432
1.27%
🎉
419
1.23%
👌
273
0.802%
🤔
268
0.787%
❤🔥
158
0.464%
🤮
129
0.379%
👎
125
0.367%
🍓
96
0.282%
💅
72
0.211%
💋
68
0.2%
🐳
60
0.176%
40 further kinds
673
1.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,776,994reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
125
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @temalebedev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2025 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.50%
45 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
45
posts carrying an erid · 45 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
158,000
over 45 measured posts
Median views · rest
148,000
over 954 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Ranykc45G5
1
5 November 2025
5 November 2025
2RanykmAREh
1
18 October 2025
18 October 2025
2RanymJSp7L
1
13 March 2026
13 March 2026
2RanymcAyxN
1
28 March 2026
28 March 2026
2RanynmpDxd
1
30 September 2025
30 September 2025
2Ranyo4fL9g
1
23 May 2026
23 May 2026
2VtzquWUuJr
1
24 July 2026
24 July 2026
2VtzquvgAHG
1
11 December 2025
11 December 2025
2Vtzqv6dNbV
1
29 October 2025
29 October 2025
2VtzqvA23pN
1
14 December 2025
14 December 2025
2VtzqvA7EQp
1
5 December 2025
5 December 2025
2VtzqvFXDxD
1
26 June 2026
26 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 33 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2025 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вайфай по смс
Пиздец, больше всего меня бесит система, когда для подключению к вайфаю тебе нужно ввести номер телефона, а потом получить смс и ввести код оттуда.
В лучшем случае ты копируешь смску, потом снова печатаешь номер телефона и регистрируешься.
Но бывают такие мудаки, которые не протестили систему и каждый раз присылают тебе новую смску. Чтобы ее скопировать, нужно выйти из входа в вайфай, а когда возвращ…
Соболезнования
Язык удивительно неприспособлен к ситуациям, когда умирают родные и близкие.
Фраза «примите мои соболезнования» - это вообще вершина неискренности. И само слово «соболезнование» - удивительно омерзительное и фальшивое.
Паблик чих
Нет ничего более приятного, чем хороший качественный чих!
Но иногда по какой-то причине чихать нельзя. Но как сдержать чих? Мне кажется, если я закрою рот во время чиха, у меня выпадут глаза.
По счастью, существуют способы достаточно эффективно чих прервать.
1) Нажать на переносицу чуть ниже кости
2) Нажать на ямочку на верхней губе
3) Прикусить кончик языка
Ну мало ли пригодится.
Зайка, побалуй себя под вечер!
ВК Видео: https://vkvideo.ru/video-211437014_456248382
Файл: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/AkoN/W7gKWbJqF
Большой файл: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/PLWh/CG3rivXHV
Подкаст: https://vk.ru/podcast-211437014_456243494
Корпоративная идеология
У меня совершенно очевидно очень серьезная профдеформация. Я не чувствую тех болей, которые чувствуют обычные люди. У меня не работает эмпатия. Я черствый, негибкий, циничный.
Казалось бы - почему так? Как может один человек быть настолько неотзывчивым в таком разнообразном спектре эмоций и ситуаций? А все просто.
Я работаю в корпоративной индустрии. Работаю долго, погруженно и успешно. И я…
Как устроены современные медиа
У меня по отношению к медиа есть наблюдательная метафора.
Если найти то место в небоскребе, где происходит забор воздуха, и пердануть туда, то результат почувствуют на всех этажах.
Все медиа-скандалы и срачи происходят по этой схеме. Секрет в том, что у жителей небоскреба выбора нет. Вентиляция у всех центральная.
А форточек, которые гарантируют приток свежего воздуха, практически …
Лимон и судьба
Существует такое американское выражение: "Если жизнь дает тебе лимон, сделай из него лимонад". Переводить его на русский буквально бессмысленно, хотя я постоянно встречаю эту фразу как пример чего-то обнадеживающего.
В лимоне нет ничего плохого. В русском языке - особенно. А вот в американском английском лимон - это обозначение чего-то сломанного, негодного, испорченного. Чаще всего лимоном называют …
Паралич воли
Иногда у меня возникает полнейший паралич воли в самых простейших вопросах.
Могу два года не отвечать на письмо. Могу три года не убирать стопку карточек с подоконника, которую надо положить в шкаф. Могу десять лет не открывать коробку с вещами, собранную в позапозапрошлый переезд.
Иногда я думаю, что это что-то плохое, типа психической проблемы. Но потом я понимаю, что это такое стремление к вечной г…
Отношения
Когда в отношениях все ясно и по полочкам - не факт, что это хорошо.
Отношения как раз хороши своей сложностью, неоднозначностью, парадоксальностью, неидеальностью, непроговоренностью. И иногда попытка привести отношения к полной ясности и прозрачности совершенно их убивает. Так что нужно научиться любить в отношениях сложность несовершенства.
И с детьми, и с женами, и с родителями, и с коллегами.
—————…
Всеядность
Я абсолютно всеяден и могу съесть все. Хотя я не люблю вареный лук и зеленую фасоль, но в принципе съем и не помру.
В своей жизни я не смог доесть еду только один раз - это была африканская тошниловка для местных в какой-то абсолютно жопной деревне, где под потолком полутораметровой высоты подавали позавчерашний комок риса с какой-то поносной подливой и мухами. Вот насколько я могу есть любой стритфуд в …
Ложка к макаронам
Пиздец как меня бесит мудовая русская традиция подавать ложку к макаронам. Никто, блять, в мире не накручивает макароны об ложку.
Это как если бы в Италии к борщу приносили бы вилку - мясо и картошку выуживать.
И еще меня бесит, что макароны называют пастой. Паста, блять, в тюбике.
🤣833👍308💯203❤72😁37🤡33💩27🥰9
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,088 posts we hold for @temalebedev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,174 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Пикабу @pikabu · 256,983 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ЮЛИЯ МЕНЬШОВА @JuliaMenshovaJulia · 361,530 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Алексей Пивоваров @Alexey_Pivo_varov · 307,573 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
СТАС БОМБИТ @ikakprosto · 329,993 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Лера Кудрявцева @lerakudryavtseva · 239,831 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Вероника Степанова @veronikastepanova20011 · 472,958 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Уютная Россия | Путешествия @travel_yutturizm · 150,437 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Lisarulit @lisarulit777 · 269,145 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Мое Образование @moe_obrazovanie · 232,374 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 263,201 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Бесплатное образование @free_edu · 311,069 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Сергей Минаев @minaevlife · 319,478 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
sndk @sndkgram · 353,448 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Лука Ебков @luka_ebkov · 429,384 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
москоутиндер @moscowtinderr · 722,101 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
Midjourney Креативы @midjourney_home · 155,254 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Сатья. Официальный канал @satyadas_official · 199,316 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Наука о сапиенсах @sapiscience · 194,355 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
Саваничи 🇷🇺 @savanichi · 195,814 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Александр Шумский | Новости @proboknet · 284,567 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ЖЮ 🧡 Videos @lifeyt · 332,273 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ТОПЛЕС @toplesofficial · 524,377 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Гарик Харламов @garbul · 168,426 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Простая экономика @prostoecon · 292,992 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 347 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
59 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артемий Лебедев” (@temalebedev), 972,194 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temalebedev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.