Channel
@cryptospletnitsa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,621subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001567058139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptospletnitsa |
| Created | 10 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptospletnitsa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 3,621 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 3,631 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 3,630 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 February 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 459 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
67 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 73.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 20.9% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 5.97% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ ВНИМАНИЕ Атака мошенников на канал и на группы бридж Сегодня мошенники вышли на моего администратора ботов, и представившись мной он попросили добавить свой контакт, под именем нового кнтакта моего помощника. Таким образом получили доступ к рабочим чатам Что они делают: • копируют ники тех, кто был в рабочих группах, именно, ваших сотрудников; • копируют рабочий чат с автараками и добавляют туда фейки м…
‼️Криптовалюта, купленная через Hodler, имеет прозрачное происхождение Наши пользователи могут спокойно отправлять её на любые биржи, включая иностранные. Без p2p. Без «грязных» кошельков. Без сомнений в происхождении средств. Именно так и должен работать современный криптообменный сервис. Обмен | НОВОСТИ
❤5👍1💅1
А вы вообще видели курсы на HODLER??! https://t.me/hodler_exchange/83
👍2
⚡️⚡️⚡️💥 У тезера что-то сломалось и в моменте разблокированы уже сотни разных кошельков на миллионы долларов. Если у вас были залоченные средства - проверяйте и уводите все в нативные токены сети
Многие до сих пор думают, что криптообменники “держат” ваши деньги у себя. Спойлер: это не всегда так В Hodler всё устроено иначе. Сервис не хранит средства пользователей. Вы не заводите туда деньги “на баланс” и не оставляете их где-то внутри системы. Как проходит операция: — вы создаёте заявку — переводите крипту — получаете рубли сразу на свою карту И всё. Без зависших средств, без хранения, без лишних рисков.…
👍3
Завтра у меня день рождения, и в этот раз я хочу попросить у вас один особенный подарок 🙏🏻 Есть одна мама, которая воспитывает девочку с ДЦП. Я давно по возможности помогаю им — финансово и репостами. Сейчас у них возникла важная необходимость — нужен специальный санитарный стул, который сильно облегчит уход за ребёнком и сделает её жизнь комфортнее. Если у вас есть возможность поддержать — любой вклад важен. Даже …
❤10
Посты от Оксаны теперь будут выходить на этом канале. Переходите и подписывайтесь, чтобы ничего не пропустить. https://t.me/podumayemzavtra
❤3
Друзья, коротко и по делу. Я бы сейчас серьезно подумала о том, чтобы снизить риски и вывести средства с Bybit. Почему: за последние дни участились случаи блокировок аккаунтов без понятной обратной связи это не единичные истории, а системный тренд по рынку мы уже видели похожую ситуацию с Binance, когда ограничения начали вводиться постепенно, а потом усилились Важно понимать контекст: из-за санкционного давления …
❤6💅2
С 8 марта 🌸 Девочки, пусть в вашей жизни будет больше спокойствия, уверенности и радости. Пусть рядом будут люди, с которыми тепло и безопасно. Пусть мечты не откладываются «на потом», а постепенно становятся реальностью. Желаю нам всем сил идти своим путем, не сомневаться в себе и всегда помнить, какие мы на самом деле сильные. И пусть сегодня будет немного больше цветов, улыбок и приятных слов. С праздником 💐
❤15
Дорогие партнёры и друзья! Мне очень повезло работать с вами с людьми, с которыми всё строится на доверии, уважении и лёгкости в общении. Я правда очень ценю наше сотрудничество и благодарна каждому из вас. Если вдруг у кого-то появится желание меня поздравить, пожалуйста, не тратьтесь на цветы — я всё равно их не успеваю насладиться. Но если очень хочется сделать приятное, можно отправить небольшой подарок в USDT…
❤4💅1
А когда кто-то видел Менделеева в последний раз?
Live stream finished (6 minutes)
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptospletnitsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 549,621 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипта, крема и сплетни” (@cryptospletnitsa), 3,621 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptospletnitsa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.