Hyperscale Data продала биткоины на $43 млн Компания Hyperscale Data, которая управляет дата-центрами для проектов в сфере искусственного интеллекта и торгуется на Нью-Йоркской фондовой бирже под тикером GPUS, реализовала 685 биткоинов. Сумма сделки составила около $43 млн. По словам исполнительного председателя Hyperscale Data Милтона Олта III, полученные средства направят на расширение и развитие дата-центра комп…

Channel
FOMOHOMO
@FOMOHOMO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,610subscribers
-145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001204280980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FOMOHOMO |
| Description | Cryptorg.exchange https://cryptorg.net/?ref=92225 Маркет шок @market_shock @market_shock_bybit VISA Crypto CARD+обмен руб/usdt https://t.me/Ctg_money_bot?start=286444466 Идеи в канале не являются инвест рекомендацией Связь,реклама @andrey_smcapital |
| Created | 25 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FOMOHOMO |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 27,610 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 27,629 | -22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 27,651 | -22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 27,673 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 27,675 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 27,693 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 27,701 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 27,721 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 27,736 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 27,743 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 27,755 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 27,755 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 27,610 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,860
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (29 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 128,804 |
| Reactions total | 1,583 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,200
- Videos
- ≈784
- Links
- ≈3,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,583 reactions across 44 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 724 | 45.7% | |
| 🔥 | 357 | 22.6% | |
| 🐳 | 197 | 12.4% | |
| ❤ | 172 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5231005931550030290 | 117 | 7.39% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.695% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.126% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,583reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 45 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FOMOHOMO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
BTC Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Вчера вечером началась волатильность и появился шорт сигнал, который уже отработал. На данный момент сигналов нет, но работаем из аномальных зон. Рынок готовится к мощному движению, но до этого может потрепать всем нервы ещё какое-то время. Будем посмотреть. Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
👍25🐳9❤6custom 52310059315500302905🔥1
85% медвежьего цикла крипторынка уже позади — DeFi Report Аналитики DeFi Report считают, что криптовалютный рынок вошел в завершающую стадию текущего медвежьего цикла. По их оценке, уже пройдено около 85% его продолжительности, а дальнейшая динамика будет во многом определяться развитием глобальной макроэкономической ситуации. Эксперты отмечают, что поведение биткоина и альткоинов сейчас во многом схоже с предыдущи…
👍18🐳4❤3
BTC Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Сигналов нет, как и волатильности. На этих выходных рынок замер на месте и не движется вообще. Может к вечеру сегодня дадут волатильность. Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
👍19❤12🔥9custom 52310059315500302904🐳1
Второй по величине держатель биткоинов зафиксировал убыток $413,5 млн Компания Twenty One Capital, одним из ключевых владельцев которой является эмитент USDT Tether, по итогам второго квартала зафиксировала чистый убыток в размере $413,5 млн. При этом компания сохраняет статус второго крупнейшего публичного корпоративного держателя биткоина. Основной причиной отрицательного финансового результата стала переоценка к…
👍9custom 52310059315500302906👻3🐳2🔥1
BTC Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Сигналы в Лонг появились, но не комбо. Поэтому могут дальше вниз тянуть. Но медвежье облако уже меньше становится, так что при пробое его, могут потянуть цену в перекупленность. Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
🔥21👍9🐳7custom 52310059315500302904
Встречайте, Кай — ИИ-ассистент Cryptorg Умный друг трейдера, который знает платформу вдоль и поперёк и отвечает за секунды. Что умеет: — Подскажет по платформе: создать бота, настроить усреднение, пройти верификацию, вывести средства — Поможет с трейдингом: параметры ботов и сигналов под вашу стратегию, с уровнем риска — Разберёт скриншот ваших ботов, сделки или ошибки — Понимает голос, отвечает на русском и англий…
🐳29👍21🔥13custom 52310059315500302902
Аналитики Glasshode заметили «слишком зажатое» состояние биткоина Курс биткоина продолжает двигаться в узком диапазоне между $63 000 и $68 700. Аналитики Glassnode отмечают, что криптовалюта пока не способна воспользоваться благоприятным макроэкономическим фоном и демонстрирует слабую реакцию на позитивные сигналы с рынков. В июле базовая инфляция в США составила 2,5%, тогда как основные американские фондовые индек…
🔥12👍7❤5
BTC Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Комбо сигналов нет. Рынок давит вниз, поэтому можем увидеть спуск в перепроданность. Медвежье облако также давит вниз, поэтому даже с текущих можно рассмотреть шорт до перепроданности. Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
👍17🔥7🐳3custom 52310059315500302903
Bitmine сократила масштабы закупки эфира Крупнейший среди публичных компаний держатель Ethereum, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, за последнюю неделю приобрела 7 391 ETH примерно на $14 млн. Объем покупок оказался на 29% ниже показателя предыдущей недели, когда компания пополнила запасы на 10 399 ETH. В результате общий объем эфира на балансе Bitmine достиг 5 805 238 ETH. Средняя цена приобретения составляет около $…
👍10❤5🔥2🤔1
BTC Аномальные ФОМО зоны на сегодня. Комбо сигнал в лонг начинает отрабатывать. Облако сменилось на бычье. Все сейчас указывает на продолжение роста в зону перекупленности. Академия, торговые системы fomotema.com
👍18🔥10custom 52310059315500302906🐳2
CryptoQuant: Биткоин почти сформировал локальную вершину цены Биткоин способен подняться до локального максимума в диапазоне $66 317–68 965, после чего риск новой волны распродаж может существенно увеличиться. К такому выводу пришли аналитики ончейн-платформы CryptoQuant. По мнению экспертов, текущее движение BTC остается частью более продолжительного нисходящего тренда. Для него характерны слабый импульс, сложная …
👍15🔥7❤5🐳5🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @FOMOHOMO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 237,814 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crypto_lopata_off · 123,376
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_sekta · 151,756
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
@mr_mozart · 130,817
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@RBCCrypto · 133,133
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@MUSIC_RILS · 141,535
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@chto_pro1shodit · 152,223
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@MELEGATEAM · 118,147
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
@div_invest · 99,685
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOMOHOMO” (@FOMOHOMO), 27,610 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FOMOHOMO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.