BTC/SP500 🍪🍪

Channel
001k.Trade
@trade001k
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
108,460subscribers
-403 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277372114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trade001k |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trade001k |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 108,460 | -78 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 108,538 | -40 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 108,578 | -36 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 108,614 | -44 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 108,658 | -28 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 108,686 | -46 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 108,732 | -34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 108,766 | -51 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:50 | 108,817 | -46 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 108,863 | first reading |
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.97%
- avg views ÷ 108,460 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,800
- 54 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 55
- of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (4 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 583,920 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Сериал «The Altruists» про крах биржи FTX выйдет на Netflix 19 ноября
👀 Кит открыл лонг по ASTER с 4x плечом на $4,3 млн, плюс еще застейкал токенов на $2,42 млн на 4 года. Интересный мув, можно последить. Тем более Aster планирует добавить аналог HIP-3 на Hyperliquid для торговли акциями, а сейчас именно туда приходится большая часть объемов. Плюс сам Binance последние недели активно билдит вокруг TradeFi. Интересно, покажет токен ASTER что-то на этом фоне или нет.
Крупняк на HL продолжает увеличивать свои шорты по BTC. Один из крупнейших шортов на HL уже увеличил позу до $125 млн (в плюсе на $1.7 млн) с ценой ликвидации — $63 528.
❗️Binance запрещает переводы с ряда CEX'ов С 23 августа Binance перестанет обрабатывать транзакции, связанные с HTX, EXMO, Rapira, WhiteBird, Aifory Pro, ABCeX, NoOnecrypto, Tradex, Monease, BitPapa и Exnode / Exnode Pay. Попытка завести средства с этих платформ может привести к комплаенс-проверке и ограничениям для кошелька.
План отрабатывается. Дальше зона интереса ☕️ BTC < $63k. Для тех, кто нас читает, текущее падение точно не стало сюрпризом. Еще в понедельник, когда цена была $65,4k, писали, что пролив буквально напрашивается — как по структуре, так и по метрикам: OI сильно рос, плечи набирались, спот-объёмы, наоборот, падали, плюс сезонность и другие факторы. Как видим, ожидания отработали. Причём даже на фоне отсутствия какого-…
🧐 BTC в моменте < $63k
А послушал бы Тёму год назад — заработал бы 😎 Этот кит купил 1 768 BTC ($131,91 млн) по $74,6k как раз перед началом бычки, но в итоге передержал и ничего не продал. На пике его профит рисовал $91 млн, а сейчас уже в минусе на $20 млн. В итоге принял решение начать продавать свои битки по текущим и фиксить убыток. Ловил ATH — словил лои. Не жадничайте!
🔥SP500 — ATH
PPI сегодня ниже ожиданий +вчерашний нейтральный CPI = рынки снова снижают ожидания по повышению ставки в сентябре. Но выводы пока делать рано — в конце месяца нужно смотреть Core PCE и ВВП за квартал (главный ориентир для ФРС). Тем не менее для фонды локальный позитив уже есть. На HL сразу полетели лонги от китов — кто-то прямо сейчас через TWAP набирает позицию на $50 млн по XYZ100 (индекс Nasdaq-100). BTC тоже …
Памп BICO на +200% и другие наши сетапы в Intraday 👀 Неделя получилась очень насыщенной — дала много инплеев, с которыми работаем и сейчас. Из самых ярких кейсов: Crypto 🟢Отработали памп HEI (+86%) и BICO (+200%) 🟢Торговали pump&dump на HEI по 70% в обе стороны 🟢Поднимали ножи на скаме BLUAI (+60%) 🟢Поработали с участником во время пампа BMT на +200% - лучшая сделка, 46% чистого движения Forex Начало августа про…
Арбитражный сбор в WEB3HUB! Появился запрос от студентов разобраться глубже в арбитраже — приняли, сделали открытый voice-room. Ребята задавали вопросы, мы разбирали их на реальных кейсах + позвали нашу выпускницу, которая уже 6+ месяцев держит топ-1 по арбитражу в Alpha, чтобы она поделилась своим опытом. Видно, как за пару месяцев ребята сильно апнули свои скиллы и теперь углубляются в конкретные направления. А…
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @trade001k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 45,970 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@divancriptoinvest · 74 postsChainOps🔗
@ChainOps · 2392 posts100KG
@I00kggem · 7792 postsПрофит в пути
@profit_vsegda · 222 postsХрам Холдеров
@UnitHX · 302 postsADEL AGREGATOR
@adel_aggregator · 3,3651 postBinarius | Инвестиции
@binariusinv · 21 postCRYPTO GAMERS
@CoinlistMoreFun · 551 post🐳Cryga |Крипто Новини 🇺🇦
@Cryga_ua · 251 postCRYPTIKON
@Crypticon1 · 2531 postCryptoFadure
@cryptofadure · 11 postСообщество хомяков
@cryptohamsters07 · 81 postCryptoidea
@cryptoidea17 · 11 postCrypto Идеи
@cryptoidea_013 · 11 postCryptoНострадамус
@cryptonostradamus1 · 16,6151 postCRYPTO 🐋
@cryptovaluata · 261 postКриптомат
@crypvo · 21 postDeeCryptos
@DeeCryptos · 121 postDEPOSIT TOKEN
@deposit_community · 5581 postС 5$ до 1000$ на крипте 👀
@five_to1000real_quick · 91 postАкції та роздачі в крипті
@freecashintg · 81 postTelegram Premium ️
@freetgpremtg · 2141 postHoldKeeper
@HoldKeeper · 3581 post𝕂𝕒𝕫𝕒𝕙𝕋𝕆ℕ
@kazahTON · 61 postLeon_crypto_channel
@Leonechannel · 121 post09k trade
@oooninek · 51 postParadoxalnyi
@Paradoxalnyii · 271 postржавая комната
@rzhaviyroom · 121 postСигналы отправка
@sscvdsvwefd · 21 postSybilys щитпост
@sybilys_crypto · 431 postApachiCryptoHub
@TheCryptoHubUA · 81 postTime Of Crypto News
@TimeOfCryptoNews · 61 postZAVOD FORWARD
@zavod_forward · 701 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@freeartybyrnd · 3793 postsMIRRORS by RND
@mirrorsbyrnd · 1,4873 postsКрипта скам?!
@cryptascam1 · 11,4492 postsCrypto GO 🚀🔥
@cryptogo2024 · 12 postsDivan Invest📈
@divancriptoinvest · 72 postsПрогаю крипту
@python_web3 · 3,9352 postsМирор 888
@amamama8b · 51 postChief meme office 👽
@chiefmemeoffice · 111 postCISmirror
@cismirror · 7571 postNo Worries! 🇺🇦
@crypto_noworries · 1,9621 postDoctorDividend
@DoctorDivivdend · 11 postMirrors 888
@jst_rmbr8888 · 1,3001 postOX!GEN ADS DAO
@oxigendao · 4561 postPENGU MIRROR — saving your money
@pengumirror · 5391 postShadowMirror
@shadowmirror · 231 postST AGGREGATOR
@st_aggregator · 2351 postTop Drops|Join
@topdrops1 · 121 postWenAltseason CIS
@wenmemeszn · 1,5321 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@trade_ultra · 30,746#1
@a01k_crypto · 31,161#2
@trading_001k · 28,647#3
@cryptomannnisnotacult · 37,825#4
@crypto_rostik · 118,646#5
@crypto_hd · 133,175#6
@DnevnikCapitanika · 16,126#7
@incrypted · 109,125#8
@golos_alpha · 13,341#9
@doubletop · 71,747#10
@markettwits · 334,389#11
@okcrypta1 · 42,337#12
@Coin_Post · 294,656#13
@invest_zonaa · 965,285#14
@hexdrunker_reflections · 31,730#15
@cryptoattack24 · 56,804#16
@CryptologyKey · 49,269#17
@cryptodaily · 87,177#18
@maloletoffcrypto · 46,346#19
@Insider_krypto · 53,771#20
@niktoneznaetx · 14,842#21
@slezisatoshi · 125,281#22
@elrmcf_free · 12,275#23
@falconinvestors · 82,298#24
@TumoBogCrypto · 37,502#25
@Defiscamcheck · 48,774#26
@korolbtc · 18,453#27
@forklog · 93,191#28
@andryuninthelegend · 18,674#29
@TVS_TEAM · 38,510#30
@savagetraderrrvlc · 8,821#31
@dshwchkfxx · 18,852#32
@bulka_crypto · 53,536#33
@mr_mozart · 130,871#34
@cryptokitta · 34,997#35
@cryptomannnacademy · 12,320#36
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,152,428#37
@idoresearch · 58,253#38
@pifagortrade · 85,776#39
@viewoflazarus · 6,470#40
@s_sensy_channel · 3,007#41
@tradertrend · 61,149#42
@mirrorreflectionhub · 7,541#43
@bitcoin_ua_telegram · 32,636#44
@M1keMoney · 5,911#45
@slavik_investor · 24,994#46
@bondcryptotrade · 6,548#47
@evans_crypto · 55,093#48
@SANCHO_DT · 65,816#49
@kosmonavtuss · 8,484#50
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 50,521#51
@blumcrypto · 15,605,597#52
@truexanewsua · 3,169,157#53
@oko_ua · 1,145,366#54
@notcoin · 9,196,576#55
@insiderukr · 2,170,486#56
@sol_TOP · 40,123#57
@OGoMono · 662,528#58
@oko18_ukr · 307,460#59
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,357#60
@selo_crypto · 40,655#61
@tstamarkets · 20,922#62
@vlad_gap · 7,578#63
@batalionmonako · 716,107#64
@jolybells · 359,769#65
@voynareal · 1,520,174#66
@u_now · 1,403,611#67
@nexta_live · 761,471#68
@mellstroybonus · 330,071#69
@cultofnot · 1,063,799#70
@UaOnlii · 1,562,229#71
@vert2026 · 120,560#72
@deepstateua · 765,624#73
@k_dvizh · 460,116#74
@superiorcryptoo · 13,725#75
@jolynews · 209,276#76
@victorr_2top · 8,292#77
@lachentyt · 1,563,312#78
@dogs · 7,497,617#79
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,667,294#80
@ukrbavovna · 644,927#81
@newsgrpua · 119,829#82
@war_monitor · 965,184#83
@kievreal1 · 1,535,796#84
@pandoras_box_ua · 159,035#85
@kievinfo_kyiv · 1,196,519#86
@xydessa · 947,909#87
@stanislav_osman · 292,866#88
@kpszsu · 895,176#89
@odessa_infonews · 981,988#90
@peregluppilovka · 4,920#91
@hyevuy_dnepr · 520,346#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@incrypted · 109,125
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@crypto_azam · 138,059
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@crypto_rostik · 118,646
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@Coin_Post · 294,656
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@mr_mozart · 130,871
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@markettwits · 334,389
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_hd · 133,175
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@cryptobosh · 149,729
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@slezisatoshi · 125,281
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@ne_investor · 192,493
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@invest_zonaa · 965,285
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@RBCCrypto · 133,170
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,357
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@mellstroybonus · 330,071
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@OGoMono · 662,528
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
@biznesuha · 209,511
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@doge1 · 677,441
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
@okx_ru · 4,163,622
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
@MELEGATEAM · 118,900
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
@ondreigoichev · 162,106
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@whale_alert_io · 304,467
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
@whalebotalerts · 146,359
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@kyiv_povestka · 237,665
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@BybitRussian_News · 119,222
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 97 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“001k.Trade” (@trade001k), 108,460 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trade001k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.