Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глеб Костарев | Love, Death & Crypto

Channel

Глеб Костарев | Love, Death & Crypto

@cryptogleb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,946subscribers

-121 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006456922
TypeChannel
Username@cryptogleb
Created4 December 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptogleb

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9446,0676,005.55 August 2026 — 6,067 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,067 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,057 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,054 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,047 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,033 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,027 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,031 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,023 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,026 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,023 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,996 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,984 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,998 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,993 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,976 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,975 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,970 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,956 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,958 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,944 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,953 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,946 subscribers5,9465 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net -121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,926–6,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 00:555,946-7
6 Nov 2026, 02:205,953+9
2 Nov 2026, 20:515,944-14
31 Oct 2026, 04:415,958+2
28 Oct 2026, 00:155,956-14
24 Oct 2026, 17:055,970-5
22 Oct 2026, 01:385,975-1
19 Oct 2026, 00:595,976-17
15 Oct 2026, 19:405,993-5
12 Oct 2026, 17:205,998+14
6 Oct 2026, 08:215,984-12
29 Sept 2026, 00:365,996-27
19 Sept 2026, 05:186,023-3
15 Sept 2026, 02:196,026+3
11 Sept 2026, 03:556,023-8
2 Sept 2026, 11:136,031+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:336,027-6
21 Aug 2026, 05:136,033-14
17 Aug 2026, 22:156,047-9
15 Aug 2026, 01:226,056first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 5,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,080
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (31 January 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total41,610
Reactions total647
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,730 reactions across 40 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁64937.5%
👍37521.7%
🤣18910.9%
❤1488.55%
💯1046.01%
🔥643.70%
💊231.33%
🤔191.10%
🤷‍♂181.04%
🤬150.867%
👀140.809%
🥴140.809%
😢130.751%
👌100.578%
⚡80.462%
😱80.462%
🙈70.405%
🤝70.405%
🤯70.405%
👨‍💻60.347%
14 further kinds321.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,730 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 40 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptogleb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,110 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Многие задаются вопросом, как инженер мог проходить интервью с рабочего компа? Он что, насколько тупой? Знаете, за время работы в разных корпорациях, я и не такого повидал. Например, в одной компании был сотрудник, который подделывал чеки, присылал их в бухгалтерию, а потом шел и эти деньги весело сливал с сотым плечом. В другом случае сотрудник незадолго до ухода попросил ряд клиентов скинуться на маркетинг в СНГ…

😁16👍13💯7😱4❤3

3 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,140 views28 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁19🔥6👍2👏1

3 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,060 views17 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @RBCCrypto

Binance раскрыла подробности взлома на $6 млрд и рассказала, как готовилась атака Binance опубликовала предварительный отчет о взломе 29 октября. По данным биржи, хакеры несколько месяцев готовили атаку, постепенно получая доступ к рабочим компьютерам и внутренним инструментам компании. В июне один из сотрудников скачал поддельный установочный файл Homebrew, популярного инструмента для управления программами в macO…

❤8👍5💊3😁1

2 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,550 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Что ни день, то новый хак. Сегодня взломали Mercado Bitcoin, крупнейшую бразильскую биржу, на 40 млн долл, а также trade․xyz. Такими темпами к концу года невзломанных бирж не останется. Канал | Чат

😁15👍9❤4🤨1🤬1🤯1

1 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,540 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Комментировать бред про роман бинансовского девопса с северокорейской шпионкой даже не буду. И естественно, ZachXBT ничего такого не писал. Канал | Чат

😁13❤2👍2

1 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,580 views41 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Binance уже восстановила вывод большинства криптовалют. В принципе, на этом историю можно закрывать. Большинство криптанов сегодня уже не помнит ни про хак Binance в 2019 году, ни про выплату свыше $4 млрд американским регуляторам в 2023-м. Так и про этот кейс через несколько месяцев никто не вспомнит. Но главный вопрос, что делать с северокорейскими хакерами, никуда не делся. И это огромная угроза для всей индустри…

💯20👍12❤4😁2👨‍💻1🤓1🤝1

30 Oct 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,190 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Пара комментариев на тему Binance, поскольку друзья и знакомые забросали вопросами: • Почему система безопасности была выстроена настолько плохо, что взлом одного девопса привел к такому хаку? Все началось со взлома одного из девопсов, но сама атака, естественно, была гораздо сложнее, и представители компании это подтвердили. Надо понимать, что биржи каждый год сталкиваются с огромным числом инцидентов безопасности…

❤27👍16🔥7👨‍💻1🙏1

29 Oct 2026, 23:19 UTC≈2,030 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁13👍3🤔3❤2🏆1🔥1

29 Oct 2026, 22:06 UTC≈2,160 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Если говорить серьезно, то происходящее - довольно сильный вызов для всей индустрии. И у меня больше нет ответа на вопрос, как и где безопасно хранить средства: • Холодные кошельки себя дискредитировали после всей истории с Ledger и продажей взломанных устройств - теперь шанс купить такой есть у каждого. • Биржи взламывают направо и налево. • Кошельки типа MetaMask и Trust Wallet страшно устанавливать, потому что в …

👍26💯4

29 Oct 2026, 21:43 UTC≈2,380 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣16😁9🤪4🥴3👍2💯2

29 Oct 2026, 21:24 UTC≈2,080 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026

После сегодняшних взломов Polymarket и Binance вся надежда на отечественные депозитарии. Канал | Чат

🤣53😁11👍4

29 Oct 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,820 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Если вы забыли, то напомню - у нас Uptober на дворе 😂️️ С такими Uptober-ами, как говорится... поседеть можно

😁11🤣9👍4❤3👨‍💻1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @cryptogleb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jan 2026, 18:02 UTCAnonymous Poll591 voters

Что сделают в понедельник ETFники?

  1. Продолжат дампить55%
  2. Начнут откупать45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

top traders desk
@toptraders0x · 23,820
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Сергей Маслов | Крипто-Евангелист
@crptmnk · 41,979
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 6 September 2026
IvanovInvest
@ivanovinvest_rus · 20,058
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Nikita Anufriev | Хедлайнеры
@nainspire · 39,304
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
AX1
@ax1vc · 20,093
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
FOMOHOMO
@FOMOHOMO · 26,559
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 131,891
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Миша Жуховицкий
@juhovitskiy · 47,846
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Cartesius channel
@LexagencyLawStream · 30,041
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
Менделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 24,122
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
АНДРЕЙ ЯДРИНЦЕВ | TURTLE WAY 🐢
@turtles_way · 30,215
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич
@wallet_with_bitcoins · 85,381
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 44,823
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
ForkLog
@forklog · 101,391
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Pentagon Channel | DYOR
@PentagonChannel · 20,054
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
CRYPTO | PERRY
@cryptoperry · 22,279
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Крипто HeadHunter | WEB 3 Jobs
@cryptoheadhunter · 20,840
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
CC | Крипто Вакансии
@careers_crypto · 26,220
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Крипто сливы
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,423
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Блокчейн Hunter | Вакансии в крипто-индустрии
@workingincrypto · 28,702
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov
@dtiAlgo · 36,800
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост
@turov · 49,124
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Binance Новости
@binance_ru · 94,896
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глеб Костарев | Love, Death & Crypto” (@cryptogleb), 5,946 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptogleb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.