https://youtube.com/shorts/E2oVrAwHDOw?si=mnLuxlAMbDESuR_F
🔥1

Channel
@CryptoFutureGroup71
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,233subscribers
-535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001691963901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFutureGroup71 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFutureGroup71 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 12,233 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 12,255 | -22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 12,277 | -27 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 12,304 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 12,332 | -53 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 12,385 | -24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 12,409 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:23 | 12,423 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 12,450 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:46 | 12,469 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 12,491 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 12,503 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 12,526 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 12,538 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 12,544 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 12,551 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 12,562 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 12,584 | -16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 12,600 | -21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 12,621 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtube.com/shorts/E2oVrAwHDOw?si=mnLuxlAMbDESuR_F
🔥1
Набросали кварцвинила) заказали кухню, 50% внесли, застолбили ценник (скоро повышение цен), с дизайнером подобрали цвет пол обои в детскую, согласно привезенному панно. Пока так) Полы - заряжено.
❤1
Уничтожился до:
Индекс страха и жадности в криптовалюте достиг годового максимума в 81, что обозначает «Экстремальную жадность». Настроения резко перевернулись в агрессивно бычьи, взлетев с «Страха» всего месяц назад и «Нейтральных» (41) на прошлой неделе.📈
Это как мой бритый бюджет, после того как выяснилось, что стяжка застройщика слишком кривожопа для кварЦ виниловых полов. Бреют везде➕ Но ремонт идет ребята, ремонт идет🙏
На утро 4 млрд сбритых шортов, божечки😬
BTC закрылся выше 200-дневной MA впервые с ноября 2025 года. Аналогичный выход вверх стал подтверждением возвращения бычьего рынка в январе 2023 года 🤑 Основной рост BTC произошел за счет шорт-сквиза после объявления Минфина США об удвоении объема выкупа долгосрочных трежерис. Важно, что доходности 30-леток уже восстановили половину вчерашнего падения, а обещанная дополнительная ликвидность начнет поступать только в…
Появляются дивера на 1ч и на 15м. 4ч. 24ч. еще нет подтверждений
«20 августа 2026 года стало рекордным днём по объёму ликвидаций шорт-позиций на крипторынке за всю историю его существования».
Президент США Дональд Трамп официально подтвердил, что американское правительство рассматривает планы по прямой закупке и накоплению значительных объемов Bitcoin и других криптовалют в дополнение к уже существующим резервам. Это заявление прозвучало на технологическом мероприятии в Белом доме, спровоцировав резкий рост крипторынка и возвращение курса биткоина к отметке выше $70 000
🇺🇸 Президент США Дональд Трамп сегодня примет в Белом доме руководителей криптоиндустрии и представителей финансовых регуляторов. Встреча начнётся в 21:30. Ожидается участие советника Белого дома по криптовалютам Патрика Витта, председателя SEC Пола Аткинса и главы CFTC Майка Селига. На встрече могут обсудить дальнейшее формирование правил регулирования цифровых активов в США. Под этот рост подтягивают новость
Мое лицо, когда вышел по 73 на ремонт представили? Не представляйте😂➕ Доллар разбился до 86 рублей)
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @CryptoFutureGroup71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoFutureGroup” (@CryptoFutureGroup71), 12,233 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFutureGroup71.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.