Channel
@DeFiHardcore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,046subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001319463545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeFiHardcore |
| Description | Blockchain & DeFi Hardcore - субъективный канал о Blockchain & DeFi! |
| Created | 21 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeFiHardcore |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 10,046 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 10,056 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 10,066 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 10,073 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 10,079 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 10,085 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 10,095 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 10,095 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⚡️ Если говорить доступным языком, то они рассматривают возможность торговать разрешенными крипто активами, пока это USDT, BTC, ETH (возможно SOL, BNB и еще пару монет) Wildberries летом планирует запустить в мобильном приложении новый сервис — витрину для покупки цифровых финансовых активов (ЦФА)
❗️ДоллАр $ ~ 70. Пу-пу-пу-пум🔻
🎖️ С Днём Великой Победы! День, когда стоит вспомнить героические подвиги дедов и бабушек, которые ценой своих жизней смогли победить фашизм.
Удивлен, но биржа Bitget согласно ежеквартальным отчетам, выкупает и сжигает около 30,000,000 BGB за квартал (90 дней) или 333,333 BGB в день (~$683,330) С учетом инфляции в 2% разблокировки резервов ежемесячно от 220млн BGB фонда Morph (не путать с Morpho), получается давление составляет ~146,600 BGB или $300,530 в сутки. Итого, +$382,800 чистого позитивного давления на стакан ЕЖЕДНЕВНО. Думайте сами, но математи…
На всякий случай, у KuCoin ($KCS) +$17,560 чистого позитивного давления Buy Pressure (бай прессуаре 🐕) на стакан ЕЖЕДНЕВНО. →График разлоков (Unlocks): Инфляция полностью остановлена. Все токены команды и инвесторов ранних раундов (Vesting) давно разблокированы. Эмиссия от майнинга = 0. → Эволюция сапплая (Max vs Total): Изначально было выпущено 200 млн KCS (Max Supply). За годы работы биржа выкупила и сожгла около…
⚡ BTC ~ $82,000+. Чик-чирик⬆
❗️Как рубят денжища умные математики. [Математика] Винрейт 99,3% на Polymarket. Без единого предсказания будущего. 72 млн сделок в бэктесте. $818K прибыли на 27 000 позиций. Бот не угадывает, что произойдёт — он считает, где ошибается толпа. X В 2-х словах Polymarket — это рынок, где люди ставят на исходы событий. Цена контракта от 0 до 100¢ — это и есть вероятность по мнению рынка. Контракт за 70¢ означает «рынок…
💰ЧТО В ПРОГРАММЕ МОСКОВСКОЙ НЕДЕЛИ ТРЕЙДИНГА? Цифровой рубль, RWA, DeFi-стратегии и ИИ в финансах — маркетинг или новая реальность? А теперь представьте: ваш банк завтра работает без API, а регулятор блокирует биометрию. Устаревшая модель? На конференции разбираем реальные тренды без хайпа. Только факты, кейсы и живые дискуссии лидеров рынка. Кто выступает: 🤩Роман Кауфман — DeFi-исследователь, стратегии доходности…
❗️BTC ~ $76,000. Чик-чирик🔻
❗️Алярм, новая история, как можно потерять телеграм и google аккаунт. Мы регулярно ходим с мужиками в баню, где можно поговорить по душам. В бане собираются оч известные люди (представители бирж, комплайнс офицеры, майнеры, основатели проектов, бизнесмены, да и в целом порядочные люди, каждого из которых я знаю). Так вот, после очередного прогрева пара на "хрен-чесноке", самый мажорный запах, один из топ менеджеро…
Огненное состязание от BitMEX с призами и розыгрышем айфонов BitMEX устроила торговое состязание «Большой куш» — турнир с призовым фондом 10 000 USDT, а среди лучших трейдеров разыграют дополнительные призы. Что на кону: — техника Apple (iPhone 17 Pro Max, MacBook Pro 16, Apple Watch Ultra 3) — Подписка TradingView на год — $4000 на путешествие Формат простой: выбираешь, в какой категории состязаться: → максимальн…
Отличная статья и мои комментарии https://cointelegraph-ru.com/news/v-aave-predstavili-dva-scenaria-razvitia-sobytij-posle-vzloma-kelp-dao
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DeFiHardcore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 175,925 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain & DeFi Hardcore” (@DeFiHardcore), 10,046 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeFiHardcore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.