Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Математик в Лондоне

@mathbotan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27,102subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002086148082
TypeChannel
Username@mathbotan
Description- Привет, а почему Вы решили написать? - Здравствуйте! Потому что не могу не писать… Смотрю на людей, события и мир с чистым взглядом и добрым сердцем и пишу об этом, пишу… Написать автору: @heymathbotan
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mathbotan

Growth

27,10227,16227,1326 August 2026 — 27,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,150 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,144 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,117 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,111 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,102 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,093–27,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:4627,102-9
12 Aug 2026, 05:4627,111-6
11 Aug 2026, 03:5127,117-6
10 Aug 2026, 02:2127,123-7
9 Aug 2026, 02:2127,130-14
8 Aug 2026, 02:0127,144-6
7 Aug 2026, 04:2027,150-12
6 Aug 2026, 02:0127,162no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:1927,162first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 27,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.892%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 December 202530 July 2026)
Views total3,250
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
440
Videos
296
Links
119

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,030 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤓1,030100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,030reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mathbotan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 December 2025 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC≈3,250 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @speshuVideo

Kimi K3 спроектировал с нуля целый гранд-отель Построить такое здание стоит $31 млн. Несмотря на это, этап проектирования доверили одному инженеру и Kimi K3 со специальным навыком. 📌 Прямо как в новые Claude и ChatGPT, в китайскую модель можно подгрузить MCP — заранее настроенные навыки. Они прокачивают нейросеть в этой или иной области и служат как сверхпродуманный general prompt. В этом случае Kimi K3 усилили с п

🤓29

24 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC≈9,000 views52 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

Текст для тех, кто разбогатеть до боли хочет Люди, которые хотят разбогатеть, делятся на два типа: те, кто просто хочет, и те, кто до боли хочет. Для вторых есть всего четыре пути: 1. Корпорация. 20–30 лет идти по головам, устраивать подставы и играть в тонкие политические игры. 2. Политика. То же самое, только опаснее. 3. Обман. Отобрать чужие активы — со всеми вытекающими. 4. Бизнес. Об этом и поговорим. Этот к

🤓52

21 Apr 2026, 15:38 UTC≈10,300 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Позвольте пригласить пользоваться сервисом моих друзей — speshu.ai (СПЕШУ АИ) Сервис без претензии на ноу-хау, понятный. Простой. Все нейросети в одном месте. И добрая идея, как применить это с душой. Привлеките родителей к оживлению семейного архива. Покажите им, как можно улучшить старые фотографии и вернуть им жизнь — буквально за несколько минут. Представьте: снимок 1992 года, вы — маленький, только

🤓32

17 Apr 2026, 09:08 UTC≈9,480 views80 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

Помните в 2005 году, когда гимн и любую музыку можно скачать с музыкального сервиса и загрузить в MP3-плеер. Никто нас не спрашивал, что и почему мы слушаем. Каждый был волен сам выбирать. И кого мы сейчас видим в чартах музыкальных сервисов?.. А ведь идея выкинуть из песни слова создает удивительную ситуацию. Идею продвигают люди, которые в начале 80-х привозили из редких зарубежных поездок виниловые пластинки, а з

🤓80

17 Apr 2026, 09:06 UTC≈7,600 views50 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Музыка на костях, как способ вернуть субъектность «Можно я не буду регистрироваться, и мы всё обсудим, как раньше?..» — возмутился старый клиент уважаемого сервиса, когда компания предложила ему создать аккаунт на свежеразработанной платформе. Среди приличных людей медицинская клиника теперь выбирается не по рейтингу, врачам и локации. А по тому, в чьих руках окажется анамнез после лечения. Становились ли хоть одна

🤓50

14 Apr 2026, 14:47 UTC≈6,200 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Нет. Людей с особенностями развития хватает везде, и Москва — не исключение. Граффити — это скорее показатель импотенции власти. Расписывать общественные места, по сути, преступление. А дальше всё развивается по простой цепочке: если можно метить стены, значит можно ломать камеры на улицах; если можно ломать камеры, значит можно грабить; если можно грабить, значит можно и убивать; а значит можно снести и власть. @m

🤓45

13 Apr 2026, 13:14 UTC≈7,100 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Иными словами, казиношники за гроши коррумпировали 5–7 SMM-щиков из уважаемых Telegram-каналов, а всем остальным идея показалась «креативной» и так получилось, что SMM-щики развелись, как дети на конфеты…И теперь еще удивляемся: мол, как же так вышло? Как найти первую костяшку домино меня не спрашивайте, я в SMM ничего не понимаю. @mathbotan 🤓

🤓28

10 Apr 2026, 15:28 UTC≈9,010 views20 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

Про ИИ. Возвращаемся к разговору. Команда реализовала продукт, в итоге получился ИИ сервис, позволяющий решать задачи любого типа. Строить агентов. Создать продакшн студии. Вайб кодить. Приглашаю первых пользователей к закрытому тестированию. Чтобы получить доступ, напишите @heymathbotan 🤓

🤓20

10 Apr 2026, 12:16 UTC≈9,620 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍👍👍👍но как рекламное место пропустили авторы этого креатива?

🤓23

10 Apr 2026, 12:14 UTC≈9,370 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

😁😆😁 автора этого креатива мы можем понять, почему не добавил в смайлы свою рекламу.

🤓21

18 Mar 2026, 19:13 UTC≈13,800 views126 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

🤓 Завтра Владимир Владимирович подъезжает к Кремлю на белом коне, грозно стукает кулаком по столу и командует «Разблокировать!» — и вновь сообщения за секунды достигают адресата.

🤓126

18 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC≈17,000 views55 reactions10 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Удивительное наблюдение! Ретроградам на заметку. Telegram запущен 14 августа 2013 года. Почти все, кто мне написал на тему AI в ЛС, все они зарегистрировали свои TG аккаунты в 2014 году, некоторые в 2015. И эти же люди сейчас крайне активны и успешны в AI технологиях. @mathbotan 🤓

🤓55

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mathbotan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,031,365 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Математик в Лондоне” (@mathbotan), 27,102 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mathbotan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.