Да никому нахуй не сдалась эта бабка с флагом. Кроме нескольких человек, которые решили, что это хороший символ.

Channel
Русское будущее
@russianfuture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
10,544subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001080591998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @russianfuture |
| Description | Сингулярность, бессмертие, русский национализм. пишите на russianfuture@protonmail.com |
| Created | 29 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/russianfuture |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 10,544 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 10,546 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 10,548 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 10,552 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 10,555 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 10,567 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 10,571 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 10,571 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.9%
- avg views ÷ 10,544 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,940
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (10 February 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,210
- Videos
- ≈140
- Links
- ≈3,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Хорошо, конечно, ебут хохлов, но мало. Мало. Надо сильно больше.
Телеведущий и мастер бесконтактного боя Владимир Соловьев официально признан пидорасом.
В Новосибирске записали видео, где местные жители благодарят власти за убой скота. Говорят, что на видео присутствуют люди, у которых и скота-то не было. Это не просто медийное дно. Это показатель того, что жертв насилия заставляют благодарить своего насильника. Ситуация ухудшается с каждым днем. Каждый шаг неправильный и выглядит как издевка над народом. Скоро заставят нас снимать видео: С благодарностью за блок…
Долбоеб ты проголосовал ЗА КАЖДЫЙ закон по которым эти ограничения происходят БУКВАЛЬНО ЗА КАЖДЫЙ https://t.me/delyagin/38966
Все ради вашей же безопасности, граждане. Приятного аппетита. Осенью еще выборы, кстати, не забудьте сходить.
Неудобно получилось.
Конец Дурова в устах Маркова (иноагента). А раньше во рту Маркова был конец Ильхама Алиева. Эк все перевернулось.
Вопросы действительно слишком обывательские. Слово, данное гражданам, силы не имеет. Пиздуйте в национальный мессенджер и не выебывайтесь.
Обывательские вопросы по поводу кампании против Telegram - Если Telegram могут читать посторонние (в том числе, возможно, и иностранные спецслужбы), как этот риск влияет на возможности его использования в качестве социальной сети и источника открытого распространения информации? - Почему Мария Бутина, которая во время процесса против неё в США убедилась в возможности взлома мессенджера, по возвращении в Россию заве…
Шел пятый год СВО. Лучше позже, чем никогда
А у телеграма были утечки к противнику? Есть нормальные доказательства? Не считая темников, спущенных админу канала wargonzo?
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @russianfuture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 260,274 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@allto_all · 111 postСыч Z
@genshtabsich · 1,4821 postКартофельные войны
@KartofelnyeVojny · 261 postчто-то в этом роде
@rrooddyyaa · 411 postСиги Лаврова
@sigilavrova · 271 postНовости спецоперации
@specoperaciya_war · 91 postХохлюшки
@ukroshki · 161 postВигиланты на марше
@vigilant_on · 61 postЗверуша и Котятка. О политике для всех
@zverusha_and_kotyatka · 91 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@akashevarova · 247,5661 postAlex Parker Returns
@apwagner · 312,6461 postЕвгений Минченко. Персонально по делу
@enminchenko · 21,1921 postSimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 155,4341 postKekenavts Analytics 🇺🇸🇷🇺🇮🇱🇰🇿🇨🇳🇰🇷🇺🇿🇹🇼
@kekanalytics · 25,3891 postМенделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 22,9721 postСОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,099,0991 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@docpro · 143,43015 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,972,5423 postsЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 130,3972 postsКолезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,8572 postsTelegram - врачам!
@telegadoctor · 762 postsMr.Cromwell
@cromwelll · 91 postThe ЦРРП
@crrpru · 521 postЦТ в ЛС
@ctvls · 821 postСыч Z
@genshtabsich · 1,4821 post#RADIO_GRAM
@radiogram_ru · 2,7811 postReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,011,9661 postTelegram Info
@tginfo · 82,1961 post9 утра | Новости и анонсы
@v9utra · 74,7541 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AlexCarrier · 147,5751 postБаррель черной икры
@banki_oil · 554,2121 postБанкста
@banksta · 437,5561 postDELYAGIN's special
@delyagin · 127,2131 postИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 110,8181 postКАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,5671 postЛогика Маркова
@logikamarkova · 54,0301 postРБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 901,5691 postТРОЙКА 🏴☠️
@rustroyka1945 · 190,9071 postСОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,099,0991 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@russianfuture named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…Идов|lang=ru|website=m24.ru|access-date=2025-10-09}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/russianfuture/8755|title=Русское будущее|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-10-09}}…”
read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русское будущее” (@russianfuture), 10,544 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianfuture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.