Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SCAMSHOT

Channel

SCAMSHOT

@skamshot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,570subscribers

+920 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322388696
TypeChannel
Username@skamshot
DescriptionВыносим мусор. Бесплатно. Ежедневно. Предложка: @skamshot_bot Никогда не пишем первыми.
Created27 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/skamshot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

37,64038,77238,2066 August 2026 — 37,650 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,650 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,647 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,651 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,644 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,671 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,688 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,731 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,768 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,159 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,215 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,236 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,243 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,244 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,254 subscribers23 August 2026 — 38,272 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,291 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,389 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,462 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,560 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,636 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,685 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,737 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,772 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,766 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,751 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,728 subscribers8 September 2026 — 38,653 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,624 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,603 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,594 subscribers16 September 2026 — 38,691 subscribers19 September 2026 — 38,703 subscribers25 September 2026 — 38,570 subscribers38,5706 August 202625 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net +920. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,470–38,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:4038,570-133
19 Sept 2026, 00:3738,703+12
16 Sept 2026, 17:5538,691+97
14 Sept 2026, 22:1838,594-9
13 Sept 2026, 09:5838,603-21
11 Sept 2026, 13:1938,624-29
8 Sept 2026, 18:1838,653-75
5 Sept 2026, 11:0038,728-23
3 Sept 2026, 15:5738,751-15
2 Sept 2026, 11:2338,766-6
1 Sept 2026, 08:1538,772+35
31 Aug 2026, 10:3538,737+52
30 Aug 2026, 09:2538,685+49
29 Aug 2026, 07:4738,636+76
28 Aug 2026, 06:5438,560+98
27 Aug 2026, 04:2838,462+73
26 Aug 2026, 01:4438,389+98
25 Aug 2026, 00:1338,291+19
23 Aug 2026, 13:0738,272+18
22 Aug 2026, 00:3838,254first reading

Engagement

293 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 38,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,540
147 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
147
of 293 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held293 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total960,940
Reactions total16,449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,800
Videos
≈6,600
Links
≈6,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
56m 56s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,786 reactions across 282 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538879899273582623912,24242.5%
😁5,09917.7%
🤣4,70616.3%
custom 53887136860953946432,1127.34%
❤7902.74%
👍7672.66%
💯5311.84%
🔥4291.49%
😱3861.34%
🤡3271.14%
🤬2830.983%
🐳1530.532%
🤔1520.528%
👏1410.49%
👀1060.368%
😢960.333%
😡690.24%
✍370.129%
🙈360.125%
💊340.118%
25 further kinds2901.01%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 293 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,898 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 293 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 293 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skamshot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 293 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC≈2,060 views111 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Кичиться бабками на камеру — ошибка. А кичиться бабками на камеру в Индии — фатальная ошибка. Индийская блогерша Мадхумитха так активно флексила в соцсетях ювелиркой и пачками налички, что добилась чего хотела и вскоре за бабками пришли. Итог: минус 944 грамма золота и весь кэш на сумму 100К баксов. Этим в целом заниматься не стоит, а в странах, где большинство населения живет за чертой бедности, уж подавно. Там и з…

custom 538879899273582623979🤣21😁7❤2🔥2

26 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC≈4,960 views173 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Теперь, чтобы стать инфоцыганом, даже не нужно тратиться на аренду лакшери-жизни. @skamshot

custom 538879899273582623998😁50custom 538871368609539464319❤5☃1

26 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈6,030 views89 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @warn_scamVideo

В Варшаве заметили супер-злодея — человека-дрейнера. Челик в синем костюме носит огромный куб на голове с надписью «FREE 100 USDC» и QR-кодом, ведущим на сайт с дрейнером — если подключить к нему кошелек, то весь бабосик улетит хуй пойми куда. SCAM LIST - подписаться

🤣74😁6🤡5❤2🐳2

25 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈6,270 views109 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

ГОИ, оказывается, неблагодарные... Никогда такого не было, и вот опять. @skamshot

custom 538879899273582623967custom 538871368609539464320😁18🤣3😱1

25 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC≈3,730 views93 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @mendeleevshina

Наконец-то разрабы допёрли как реализовать в Биткоине приватные транзакции уровня Zcash без форка и без изменений правил консенсуса 24 сентября исследователи Клара Шикельман, Миша Комаров и Алексей Москвин представили Shielded Bitcoin – метапротокол, который позволяет скрывать отправителя, получателя и сумму перевода, используя существующую инфраструктуру Биткоина Логика работы протокола следующая: Вместо публикац…

custom 538879899273582623974custom 538871368609539464311👍5❤2🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC≈7,340 views64 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Найди 5 отличий и получи приз 💸 Лоховозка «Поток Кеш» выкатила свою новую биржу Winance (отдельно под свой мусорный еРАБль). Правда, есть один нюанс: отличий от их старой платформы ноль. Но тут их можно понять, дизайн изначально был близок к идеалу И после этого вы ещё подозреваете, что пирамидка присвоила чьи-то деньги? Да у них, судя по результату, даже на школьника-фрилансера не нашлось, чтобы им сайты за 5 рубл…

🤣45🤪9🤡5😁3❤2

25 Sept 2026, 10:27 UTC≈6,270 views63 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Вот это рекламная кампания у BingX. Правда, новых пользователей вряд ли добавит 🤨 История со скамом через копитрейдинг уже разлетается по крупным ресурсам, которые обычно вообще про крипту не пишут. И опять это: «Хочу пожелать вам тщательно проверять, кому вы переводите свои средства». Во-первых, человек не отправлял деньги какому-то трейдеру в личку. Он подключился к копитрейдингу внутри самой биржи, выбрав доступ…

custom 538871368609539464345❤8😁4💯3🤡3

25 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC≈6,460 views41 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

На отслеживаемых кошельках Bitget около $6,27 млрд. Это вместе с клиентскими активами и защитным фондом. Украденные $351 млн составляют примерно 5,6% всей этой суммы. Причём значительная часть оставшихся миллиардов уже принадлежит клиентам. И даже если всё покроют, как обещают, на этом история не закончится. Фонд потом надо набивать заново. Переложить деньги из резерва можно, вернуть этим действием украденные сотни …

🤡24😢9👍4🐳2💯2

25 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC≈7,030 views138 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

В итоге у Bitget украли $351 млн. Кто-то залез в серверную часть, подправил данные о переводах и нажал обычную кнопку подписания. Дальше система сама, добровольно, по всем регламентам подписала чужие транзакции и отправила деньги. Приватные ключи, утверждает биржа, не утекли. Причём заметили они это в 18:31. А в 19:01 у них ушли ещё 19 млн USDT0. Что именно команда делала эти полчаса, пока неизвестно. Зато хацкер …

custom 538879899273582623992custom 538871368609539464328😁10❤5👍3

24 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈7,070 views136 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Отец знакомого работает в Битгет. Сегодня срочно вызвали на совещание. Вернулся поздно и ничего не объяснил. Сказал лишь собирать вещи и бежать в магазин за продуктами на две недели. Сейчас едем куда-то далеко за город. Не знаю что происходит, но мне кажется началось... @skamshot

🤣69custom 538871368609539464340😁15🤡7👀5

24 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC≈8,840 views127 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Биржу Bitget, скорее всего, взломали на $100,000,000. Некоторые аналитики пишут, что украдено уже более $170m. @skamshot

custom 538879899273582623993custom 538871368609539464321😁8🤬3🤔2

24 Sept 2026, 19:39 UTC≈7,130 views66 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

У вас и у соседа может стоять один и тот же MAX. Только дополнительный сбор данных могут включить именно вам. Даже обновлять приложение для этого не понадобится. Исследователи InterSecLab и RKS Global разобрали Android-версию 26.12.0 и нашли настройки, которые приходят с сервера и могут отличаться для разных аккаунтов. Через них включается отправка IP, информации об операторе, наличии VPN и доступности сервисов. Отк…

😁35🤬17🤡9😱3👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 293 posts we hold for @skamshot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 57 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Чё по репортам?
@whyreport · 63
10 posts
Trader Income - СКАМ!
@Study_trader_income · 100
8 posts
Trader Income - SCAM!
@Trader_income · 19
8 posts
Арсен и что-то еще
@arseninvestor · 59
5 posts
Чистый плюс/Академия Трейдинга
@chistiyplus · 1
5 posts
P2Pro SCAM!
@P2PRO_Official · 79
4 posts
EVOSIM INFO
@coinfarmp2e · 88
4 posts
FIVELIVE - СКАМИНА ДАМИРА!
@fivelive_channel · 1
4 posts
FIVELIVE
@fivelive_forum1 · 1
4 posts
🍊 Один из сотен Crypto-каналов в твоей ленте
@ton2kyc · 976
4 posts
Кафедра криптовалют ❌SCAM❌
@BTC_Konstantin · 5
3 posts
Анти Трейдинг
@antitrading24 · 761
3 posts
Криптач
@kripota4 · 694,128
3 posts
likwel -scam
@likwel_scam · 2
3 posts
Hodl & Hedge
@Just_Hedge_it · 249
2 posts
Black Swan ⬛
@black62swan · 548
2 posts
Крипто скуфы
@cryptoscufff · 3
2 posts
FIVE LIVE SKAM!
@evgeniy_fivelive · 1
2 posts
FiveLive - СКАМ! ПИРАМИДА!
@fivelive_chat · 5
2 posts
#golosoff
@golosoffcrypto · 64
2 posts
IVfun | Дневник памяти
@ivfuna · 22
2 posts
Дмитрий Мазанов соучастие
@mazanov_souchastie · 13
2 posts
ПОЛУНИН
@polunintrade7 · 519,867
2 posts
Скам! Поток Cash | Erub |BlackBit | Cash Flow | Меркурий
@sincerescam · 787
2 posts
Слезы Криптана
@slezi_cryptana · 26
2 posts
Чё по мемам?
@whymemes · 103
2 posts
КитHasher
@Battlefield5_WATCH_GAME · 5
1 post
Ботоводы кидалы
@Blacklist_20_23 · 266
1 post
Деньги Верните !
@DengiVernite · 1,904
1 post
Вас Наебали 8===э 💦
@ForexConsulting · 106
1 post
Царство Jeralda
@JeraldRekaChannel · 26
1 post
Cartesius channel
@LexagencyLawStream · 29,770
1 post
Профессор Альтов Соколов SCAM
@altcoin_prof · 1
1 post
🌚 Курилка юриста
@antiblok115 · 90
1 post
Богдан Галицкий
@bogdangalitskii · 15
1 post
Work by M
@c_c_cc_c_c · 292
1 post
CA-Alpha
@caalpha · 4
1 post
Cryptonews Mr.₿ 🎩
@crypto_chatgpt · 101
1 post
CRYPTOLUCH
@cryptoluch1 · 370
1 post
Фразы хотера
@hotersmart · 31
1 post
🖌Инсайдер Ника🖌 Доход в легкости💵💳💰🚀🚎💸💎
@invest_insider_nika · 30
1 post
Лудка Смайла 🙂
@ludka_smile · 652
1 post
Менделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 23,888
1 post
Хочу всё знать про криптомир!
@mirscruptoy · 106
1 post
Mister Biznes Scam
@misterbizneschat · 29
1 post
Vaneev
@mr_vaneev · 52
1 post
Сетевой Дозор
@negativshik · 332
1 post
Kредитный Юрист РФ
@netdolgovRF · 565
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мысли Вайкоффа
@wyckoffcompany · 68,173
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SCAMSHOT” (@skamshot), 38,570 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skamshot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.