Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SCAMSHOT

@skamshot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37,731subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322388696
TypeChannel
Username@skamshot
Created27 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skamshot

Growth

37,64037,73137,685.56 August 2026 — 37,650 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,650 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,647 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,651 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,644 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,671 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,688 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,731 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,626–37,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:1337,731+43
11 Aug 2026, 23:2737,688+17
10 Aug 2026, 22:3137,671+27
9 Aug 2026, 21:3137,644+4
8 Aug 2026, 20:5237,640-11
7 Aug 2026, 23:4237,651+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:2137,647-3
6 Aug 2026, 01:4937,650no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3637,650first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 37,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,760
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held48 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total228,260
Reactions total3,960
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 39s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,848 reactions across 37 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁77927.4%
🤣60421.2%
custom 538871368609539464336212.7%
👍30710.8%
1314.60%
🔥1224.28%
custom 5388798992735826239983.44%
😱863.02%
🤬622.18%
💯471.65%
👏431.51%
311.09%
🤔311.09%
👨‍💻250.878%
🤡210.737%
😡160.562%
🍌110.386%
🐳110.386%
🥰110.386%
👀100.351%
8 further kinds401.40%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,960reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 48 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skamshot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,140 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ondreigoichev

Парень, который одновременно продвигает реферальные ссылки на четыре биржи, платный торговый чат, бесплатный торговый чат, платного торгового бота, бесплатного торгового бота, массу сторонних продуктов и курсы, говорит, что всё это пустяки, и на своей торговле он зарабатывает кратно больше, а это для него просто хобби и альтруизм.

custom 538871368609539464349😁16👍2🔥2👏1

12 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈3,180 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

То есть никого не смущает, что сейчас почти все свежие истории про скам начинаются именно через домовые чаты в Максе? Их ещё и обязательными сделали.Либо это полный идиотизм, либо кто-то уже официально помогает скамерам работать. @skamshot

💯43🥰4🍾3👏3

12 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,660 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мясорубка 2.0: как Bitget посмотрела на Gate и вырезала шортистов на $20 миллионов В этот раз под раздачу попал токен TUT. Сценарий отработал как под копирку. На реальном споте спекулянты качнули монету, но она тормознула на адекватных 30 центах. Зато фьючерсный стакан Bitget сошел с ума и улетел в космос, пробив отметку в $1. И это не была пара случайных покупок в вакууме — биржа провернула полноценную бойню с обор

🔥15😁8😱5🥰4🤩2

12 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈3,740 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Telegram-каналы уже разгоняют панику: неизвестный хакер якобы слил всю базу госуслуг Казахстана и продаёт её в даркнете за полбитка. Продавец абсолютный новорег с нулевой репутацией. Архив 2,7 ГБ, в который якобы влезли миллионы сканов документов. Цифра 15 млн идеально совпадает с официальной статистикой. Летом прошлого года уже гуляла почти такая же база на 16 миллионов. Тогда выяснилось, что это Франкенштейн из ст

👏204👍3😱3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈4,020 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Толпа Спанч-Бобов устроила жёсткий рейд на мошеннический колл-центр в Индии @skamshot

🤣69👏5👍2🔥1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈4,330 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ГОСДОЛГ США — $40 ТРЛН. ВСЁ. ЗАВТРА АМЕРИКА ТОЧНО СКАМ. Спойлер: завтра не рухнет. Именно поэтому всё намного хуже. Механика выглядит знакомо: старые долги гасят за счёт новых займов. Запусти такую модель в Telegram, то тебя назовут пирамидой. Запусти её в масштабе государства, получишь крупнейший рынок облигаций в мире. Но у США есть чит-код, о котором мечтает любой мошенник: они сами печатают валюту, в которой в

🔥36🤔156👍4😁3

12 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈3,980 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

*Продолжение поста 😅

😁30🤣6

12 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈4,180 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Так где в итоге правда?) 🌟 @scamershunters

😁24custom 53887989927358262394

11 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈5,100 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Владельца российского X‑Family старательно прячут. Зато у лоховозки, в которую клуб поставляет новых участников, хозяин вполне публичный. Знакомьтесь, Йони Ашуров. Сама MWR Life называет его основателем, президентом и CEO. Во флоридских документах Jonatan Ashurov указан участником MWR LIFE, LLC, а в британской MWR LIFE LIMITED до её ликвидации контролировал более 75% акций и голосов. Доказательств, что Ашуров лично

👍5323👀10🤔2🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈4,180 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @scamershuntersPhoto

Насколько всё хуёво у крипто-скамеров, что спустя год они снова пишут старой базе и пытаются её доразвести. Новые уже не ведутся. Остаётся только доить тех, кто когда-то подписался и до сих пор не отписался. @scamershunters

😁61custom 538871368609539464314custom 538879899273582623971

11 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC≈6,260 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сбер запустил бесплатный сервис «Доверенный контакт». При подозрении на мошенничество банк приостановит операцию и свяжется с заранее выбранным близким клиента. После разговора Сбер решит — провести перевод или заблокировать его. На наш взгляд, это действительно полезная защита: человек под влиянием мошенников часто уже не верит банку, но звонок близкого может привести его в чувство. Главное — подключить сервис зара

🔥54👍168

11 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈5,410 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Скам с женским голосом: как мелкая телефонистка раздела криптанов на миллионы и спалилась на понтах Забудьте про сложные блокчейн-эксплойты и суровых киберпреступников в капюшонах. За кражей миллионов долларов стояла обычная мелкая американская зумерша по имени Tiffany Milanovich, которую он связывает с группировкой, похитившей у владельцев криптовалюты минимум $5 млн. Вся их криминальная схема, это банальный конве

🤣68👏13🍾64🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @skamshot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,804 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Чё по репортам?
@whyreport · 64
10 posts
Trader Income - СКАМ!
@Study_trader_income · 104
8 posts
Trader Income - SCAM!
@Trader_income · 20
8 posts
Арсен и что-то еще
@arseninvestor · 59
5 posts
EVOSIM INFO
@coinfarmp2e · 92
4 posts
P2Pro SCAM!
@P2PRO_Official · 81
4 posts
🍊 Один из сотен Crypto-каналов в твоей ленте
@ton2kyc · 1,004
4 posts
Анти Трейдинг
@antitrading24 · 770
3 posts
Кафедра криптовалют ❌SCAM❌
@BTC_Konstantin · 6
3 posts
Black Swan ⬛
@black62swan · 550
2 posts
FiveLive - СКАМ! ПИРАМИДА!
@fivelive_chat · 5
2 posts
#golosoff
@golosoffcrypto · 67
2 posts
IVfun | Дневник памяти
@ivfuna · 22
2 posts
Hodl & Hedge
@Just_Hedge_it · 257
2 posts
Дмитрий Мазанов соучастие
@mazanov_souchastie · 13
2 posts
Скам! Поток Cash | Erub |BlackBit | Cash Flow | Меркурий
@sincerescam · 748
2 posts
Слезы Криптана
@slezi_cryptana · 26
2 posts
Чё по мемам?
@whymemes · 104
2 posts
🌚 Курилка юриста
@antiblok115 · 155
1 post
КитHasher
@Battlefield5_WATCH_GAME · 5
1 post
Ботоводы кидалы
@Blacklist_20_23 · 270
1 post
Богдан Галицкий
@bogdangalitskii · 16
1 post
Work by M
@c_c_cc_c_c · 297
1 post
Cryptonews Mr.₿ 🎩
@crypto_chatgpt · 100
1 post
CRYPTOLUCH
@cryptoluch1 · 381
1 post
Деньги Верните !
@DengiVernite · 1,909
1 post
Вас Наебали
@ForexConsulting · 3,037
1 post
Фразы хотера
@hotersmart · 34
1 post
🖌Инсайдер Ника🖌 Доход в легкости💵💳💰🚀🚎💸💎
@invest_insider_nika · 30
1 post
Царство Jeralda
@JeraldRekaChannel · 24
1 post
Криптач
@kripota4 · 748,311
1 post
Лудка Смайла 🙂
@ludka_smile · 805
1 post
Хочу всё знать про криптомир!
@mirscruptoy · 106
1 post
Mister Biznes Scam
@misterbizneschat · 36
1 post
Vaneev
@mr_vaneev · 52
1 post
Сетевой Дозор
@negativshik · 328
1 post
Kредитный Юрист РФ
@netdolgovRF · 577
1 post
OCG (КриптоКонсультант)
@olympcapitalgroup · 376
1 post
ПОЛУНИН
@polunintrade7 · 549,651
1 post
Хата Спрута @rudbet_bot
@sproo · 316
1 post
ВЭД. Мошенники. Черный список участников ВЭД рынка
@ved_black_list · 748
1 post
Че по профитам
@why_profit · 21
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SCAMSHOT” (@skamshot), 37,731 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skamshot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.