Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BitLenta 🌲🪙⚡️ Вечный Восходл Души! サトし なカモと

Channel

BitLenta 🌲🪙⚡️ Вечный Восходл Души! サトし なカモと

@BitLenta

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,083subscribers

-199 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063552156
TypeChannel
Username@BitLenta
Created24 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitLenta

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “BitLenta 🎮🌲” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

13,08313,28213,182.55 August 2026 — 13,282 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,282 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,277 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,271 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,264 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,252 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,247 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,242 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,230 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,208 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,202 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,197 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,191 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,189 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,183 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,184 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,173 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,169 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,170 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,168 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,165 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,155 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,150 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,141 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,135 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,130 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,124 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,119 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,083 subscribers5 August 202626 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net -199. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,053–13,312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 04:0213,083-36
19 Sept 2026, 06:1813,119-5
16 Sept 2026, 20:5813,124-6
14 Sept 2026, 21:0013,130-5
13 Sept 2026, 08:1513,135-6
11 Sept 2026, 07:5513,141-9
8 Sept 2026, 15:2213,150-5
5 Sept 2026, 07:3913,155-10
3 Sept 2026, 14:1913,165-3
2 Sept 2026, 09:1313,168-2
1 Sept 2026, 12:2713,170+1
30 Aug 2026, 11:2413,169-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:0813,173-9
28 Aug 2026, 08:3313,182-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:4513,184+1
26 Aug 2026, 04:4313,183-6
25 Aug 2026, 02:5413,189-2
23 Aug 2026, 15:0313,191-6
22 Aug 2026, 03:0513,197-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:2213,202first reading

Engagement

358 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.53%
avg views ÷ 13,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
64
of 358 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held358 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total71,384
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 03:03 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 2 September 2026

Как минимум не кинет как кое-кто швырнул всех не раз на этом.

Signed OFF

2 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

👀 Сбер запустил международные расчёты в крипте. Новая реальность. Когда есть спрос и невозможно его упустить.

Signed OFF

1 Sept 2026, 23:48 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 2 September 2026

Скоро будет коллапс на границе https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JtCL7g9t7g

Signed ES

1 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Какой смысл в самом щедром родительском пособии, если мы потеряем свободу и мир в Европе окажется под угрозой?, — Мерц, рассуждая о перераспределении бюджетных расходов в пользу военных нужд.

Signed OFF

1 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Связанные с Lazarus кошельки провели через Hyperliquid более $30 млн По данным аналитика Arkham Эмметта Галлика, средства заводили в BTC через HyperUnit, конвертировали в ETH и SOL, а затем переводили между сетями и выводили на биржи. История всплыла на фоне переговоров Hyperliquid о возможном выходе на регулируемый рынок США.

Signed ES

1 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 2 September 2026

Можно брать кредиты под залог крипты на биржах без всяких сборов.

Signed ES

1 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Сбер планирует выдавать кредиты под залог #BTC, #ETH и #USDT. Запуск состоится после вступления в силу всех положений нового регулирования и допуска этих активов к публичному обращению со стороны ЦБ РФ. ++ Банк до конца 2026 года запустит международные расчеты в цифровых валютах для бизнеса прямо в мобильном приложении.

Signed ES

1 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 2 September 2026

Господи, какое же это говно! Сам этот CBDC, и логотип и цвет. Всё говно.

Signed ES

Showing the 12 most recent of 358 posts we hold for @BitLenta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Bit Ads 🌲🌃🖥
@bit_ads · 37
19 posts
Bitcoin Accepted
@bitcoin_accepted · 4
10 posts
Крипто N | мысли, новости, инсайты
@cryptomans · 22
10 posts
DimaBitcoiner [Premium] TradingView
@DimaBitcoiner · 2
9 posts
Обменники криптовалюты
@criptoex · 2
6 posts
♟GPolitique
@GPolitique · 17
3 posts
ProCryptoInvestor
@ProCryptoInvestor · 52
3 posts
Crypto is freedom
@cryptoisfreedom · 34
3 posts
Криптоинтеллект
@kriptosegan · 38
3 posts
Обновления 🎮🌲 BitcoinXBot
@BXBup · 62
2 posts
Блокчейн Академия
@BlockchainAcademy · 154
2 posts
️Успешные инвестиции (Disrupt Finance System)
@CryptoGoodWIN · 138
2 posts
Doge-1 mission to the moon
@bit04ek · 19
2 posts
RTFM-cryptotrading
@cryptoRTFM · 6
2 posts
SMART TAKE | Индикаторы
@smart_take · 29
2 posts
AeroDrop 🌲 Bounties & AirDrops
@AeroDrop · 188
1 post
AI by A&I (Analytics & Investments)
@AnalyticInvest · 27
1 post
Tons of Crypto News
@Criptobtc · 15
1 post
DDLinksBlockchain
@DDlinksblockchain · 451
1 post
DLTcrypto
@DLTcrypto · 9
1 post
Стипендии & Grants
@GrantsOpportunities · 2,396
1 post
INFLOW + Minter
@Minflow · 37
1 post
Печкин
@PechkinForeva · 682
1 post
Крипто-дневник от новичка до Профи
@arty_crypto · 78
1 post
Bitflyx Analytics
@bitflyxTA · 102
1 post
Национальный БК
@coronahood · 4
1 post
Cripota
@cripotabinance · 2
1 post
Генератор Денег
@generator72 · 816
1 post
Министерство Счастья РФ (Official)
@happymin_RF · 4
1 post
HYIP BEAST – хайпы, инвестиции, криптовалюта, ICO, биткоин, блокчейн
@hyip_beast · 66
1 post
ICO Eye
@icorank · 14
1 post
БОРОДАТЫЕ ИНВЕСТИЦИИ
@investboroda · 2
1 post
Для Своих ☀️
@lifehack2024 · 22
1 post
Group Of интеллектуал’Ь
@mmarketboy · 75
1 post
Кончик иглы
@needletip · 34
1 post
Payments Bridge
@paymentsbridge · 6
1 post
Real AI-IT World
@reallmit · 7
1 post
Сливки с DeFi фарминга и хайпов
@slivki_haipov · 17
1 post
Мой дневник
@tobolovtrading · 84
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SatoshiBitkoinov channel
@satoshibitkoinov · 58,761
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Менделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 23,888
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
ForkLog
@forklog · 92,233
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Bitpapa Media
@bitpapa_io · 106,971
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
ФинТех|Обмен валют
@FinTechExchange1 · 23,952
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 17 September 2026
Крипто сливы
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,736
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
BlackAudit
@BlackAudit · 52,188
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Cartesius channel
@LexagencyLawStream · 29,770
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,308
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
DAO KONDR VC - Биткоин / криптовалюта / блокчейн
@daokondrvcru · 26,058
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
CRYPTO SEKTA | Биткоин и криптовалюта
@crypto_sekta · 144,816
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Gennady M
@gen_m · 67,020
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋
@kitinvest · 28,637
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Мир без границ с Кондрашовым
@kondrworld · 54,211
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
QuantPro⚡️Trading
@QPROtrading · 24,266
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Криптопатолог | Новости | Инвестиции
@criptopatolog · 79,922
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
10 долларов Баффетта
@buff_10 · 60,042
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov
@dtiAlgo · 37,289
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BitLenta 🌲🪙⚡️ Вечный Восходл Души! サトし なカモと” (@BitLenta), 13,083 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitLenta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.