Авторский телеграм-канал от Смирнова Сергея. Купить рекламу https://clck.ru/3Ficg6 Основной канал Смирнова Сергея https://t.me/s/ogo_nedviga Заявление № № 4780008338
Created
23 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,188–31,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 14:53
31,245
+3
14 Aug 2026, 00:26
31,242
-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:02
31,243
+19
11 Aug 2026, 21:23
31,224
+29
10 Aug 2026, 19:16
31,195
-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
31,201
-11
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
31,212
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:21
31,213
-13
6 Aug 2026, 15:14
31,226
-7
6 Aug 2026, 09:48
31,233
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 31,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,300
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
36 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
443,200
Reactions total
21,756
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
930
Videos
217
Links
643
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,756 reactions across 36 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
21,756
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,756reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.78%
1 of 36 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12,300
over 35 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJtJ2Qq
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Господа собственники! Как застройщиков, так и частные! Вы откуда решили, что сегодня вы короли рынка? Вы голову то вытащите из 2022 года, когда все мели, что не поставь рынок. Всё! Привет! Все закончилось! Перезастрой вас сделает нищими. А банки крепко вас натянут на кукан! За эту неделю посмотро насмотрелся на понторезов и королей рынка недвижимости. Ни подготовки объекта к продаже, не внятной цели сделки, ни финанс…
Я писал этот тектст два с половиной года назад. И вот европейцы и американцы неожиданно начали трезветь и искать на складах оружие )) Им казалось, что воевать 5 лет с нами руками Украинцев - нет никаких проблем. Тут еще США отгрузили ракет Израилю и сами постреляли по Ирану. И упс.... Оказывается никто не готовился к окопной войне с линией фронта на 1000+км. Никто не понимал из современных политиков, что последние ра…
Есть миллионы идиотов, которые думают, что Яндекс.Такси поднимает цену в плохую погоду из-за высокого спроса. Дебилы вы! Не знающие психологию водителей. Ответственно вам объясняю, так как знаю эту информацию из первых рук основателей таких сервисов. Цена повышается для удержания водителей на линии!!! Водители снимаются в дождь и снег с линии и не выходят в рейс. Время ожидания такси резко возрастает. Поэтому повышен…
Если честно, собственники, вы меня заебали люто вопросом «есть ли у вас покупатели?». Блядь! У нас в рекламе стоит постоянно 240-300 лотов! Есть ли у нас звонки покупателей? Если в квартал мы продаем 150 лотов, если ли у нас покупатели?! Сука!!! Мы вам список сделок выкатить можем! Если мы в квартал покупаем 100 лотов на договорах подбора, где за подбор платит покупатель! Есть ли у нас покупатели?! Что ебень у вас в …
Что ни день, то очередное разочарование в так называемых «управленцах» на стройках. Какое же говно они творят!!
И некоторые инвесторы искренне верят в их красивые таблички с доходностью. А потом вникаешь - смета раздута вдвое, подрядчики в запое, юрист разводит руками перед очередным иском, а миллиарды застревают на этапе котлована.
Почему каждый второй, кто побегал пару лет в каске и научился орать на каменщиков, …
Вы заметили, что Патриках исчезли все эти бляди и пиздаболы про миллиарды, которые они якобы зарабатывают? А знаете в какие ниши ушли эти идиоты и идиотки с камерами? Флиппинг, ремонт квартир и агенты по подбору новостроек в рассрочку.
ЕСТЬ ТАКОЕ ПОНЯТИЕ «КАНАЛИЗАЦИЯ ПРОТЕСТА»
В Российском общество растет раздражение. И раздражение имеет свойство аккумулироваться. В таком случае нужно куда-то его выплескивать.
Одним из таких направлений стал поощряемый молчаливым согласием государства «потребительский экстремизм».
Теперь гражданам дали возможность выплескивать агрессию на бизнес во всех его проявлениях.
Елена Летучая врывается с бездоказательно…
После 20 лет работы в недвижимости я сам могу написать книгу «Извращения в семейных отношениях и «ценностях»». Такого насмотрелся, что никакой психолог не видел.
Шлепки и тапки Hermes настолько «нишевый» продукт на ногах русских дам, что уже перебил все гучи и баленсиаги. С «Нишевостью» тапок от Hermes может конкурировать в России этим летом только «гвоздь браслет от Картье» и Ваня Клиф ))
А я правильно понимаю, что горящие по миру нефтебазы, танкеры, заводы, бензоколонки. Это часть единого замысла в борьбе за экологию и чистый воздух на планете. Борьба с парниковым эффектом ))))
👍858
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @smirnov_neformat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,275 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
На пенсию в 35 лет @pensiya35 · 123,553 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 107,980 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
ГЕОСТРАТЕГ @geostrategrus · 125,360 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
«Свой Гектар» @svoygectar · 173,053 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Юлия Толстихина | земля, недвижимость, заработок @tolstihina_invest · 104,953 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НеФормат | Сергей Смирнов” (@smirnov_neformat), 31,245 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smirnov_neformat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
